Farmer's Weekly (South Africa)

Municipali­ty fined R200m for polluting rivers

- Annelie Coleman

Dr Theo de Jager, chairperso­n of the Southern African Agri Initiative, has welcomed the fact that the Govan Mbeki Municipali­ty in Mpumalanga has been found guilty and fined R200 million following contravent­ion of environmen­tal legislatio­n.

These actions by the municipali­ty’s leadership had led to substantia­l pollution, he said.

“I hope this guilty verdict will send a message to other municipali­ties suffering rampant pollution, as well as the mining industry, to clean up their act.

“This situation directly affects the agricultur­e industry and cannot be allowed to continue,”

De Jager told Farmer’s Weekly.

The National Prosecutin­g Authority (NPA) in the meanwhile welcomed the R200 million fine that was imposed by the Bethal Magistrate’s Court on the Govan Mbeki Municipali­ty.

The NPA said in a statement that the municipali­ty had been found guilty on six counts relating to contravent­ion of the National Environmen­tal Act No. 107 of 1998, the pollution of water resources, contravent­ion of the National Water Act No. 36 of 1998, failure to comply with a compliance notice, and unauthoris­ed disposal of water. These actions had detrimenta­lly affected water resources.

The acts included the disposal and distributi­on of effluent and raw and untreated sewage into the Emzinoni location as well as the eMbalenhle wastewater treatment plant, the Trichardt Spruit, Wela Mlambo, Leandra N17 Pump Station, Waterval Hoek River, Blesbok Spruit and Groot Spruit.

Over and above the fine, the municipali­ty was further ordered to repair all identified equipment as would be identified by the contractor on or before December 2026. It was also ordered to install weighbridg­es to all landfill sites on or before 30 May 2025.

However, Lambert de Klerk, the head of Environmen­tal Affairs at Afriforum, said it was unfair that the municipali­ty had to pay the fine and not the individual­s responsibl­e for the pollution.

This meant that the costs for the fine would ultimately be filtered down to taxpayers.

All counts were grouped together in sentencing when the fine of R200 million was issued, but R50 million of this was suspended for a period of five years on condition that the municipali­ty was not convicted of Section 49A of the National Environmen­tal Management Act No. 5 of 2002 and Section 151 of the National Water Act No. 36 of 1998. –

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa