Go! Drive & Camp

FAST CHARGE

Should you ditch your lead-acid battery for lithium-ion technology? We look at the pros and cons to help you make an informed decision.

-

While some overland travellers have already migrated away from lead-acid batteries in favour of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4), others are still on the fence as they’re not yet convinced of the economics.

Installing a more expensive LiFePO4 auxiliary battery setup in a vehicle that’s only used a few times a year can be a tough pill to swallow, but the significan­t recharge benefits it offers may just justify the expense. And it’s not just about economics. The real question is: how much better performing is LiFePO4 when compared to lead-acid batteries? And does that performanc­e validate the higher upfront costs? BATTERY TESTS Boasting a range of DC-DC chargers that are all lithium, AGM and wet-cell compatible, National Luna recently tested three battery options that are commonly used within the leisure market. They conducted these tests by dischargin­g each battery type by 70Ah and then recorded the recharge performanc­e using their 25A and 40A DC-DC chargers. As shown in the graphs, the LiFePO4 battery features a longer bulk charging stage in relation to its shorter absorption stage. This is thanks to lithium having a better conversion efficiency, which means the LiFePO4 battery reaches its full capacity in a far shorter period. In contrast, the recharge performanc­e of the wet-cell and AGM batteries is hindered by a disproport­ionately short bulk stage, in comparison to a longer absorption stage. What’s more, the extra 15 amps of the NLDC-40 help the LiFePO4 battery reach a full charge in less than two hours. It goes without saying that a rapid recharge cycle is supremely practical in terms of driving times and how you plan your road trip. OTHER CONSIDERAT­IONS Of course, only you can decide if the above data justifies a migration, but aside from the rate of recharge, there are several other benefits and drawbacks consider: COST VS PERFORMANC­E With the above in mind, it’s clear that the decision to adopt LiFePO4 technology has less to do with economics and more to do with the convenienc­e of having a fastchargi­ng dual-battery system. That said, it’s really a personal question of whether the performanc­e benefits of a LiFePO4 battery are enough to overlook the initial costs of the new-fangled technology. And keep in mind that the integratio­n of a solar panel as well as your camping habits will also greatly influence your decision. For instance, do you typically drive long distances between camps, do you move around a lot or do you tend to stay in one campsite for a few days? What’s more, not all DC-DC chargers support lithium technology, so make sure your DC- DC unit is lithium compatible before you make any changes to your dual-battery setup. Fortunatel­y, no matter which battery technology you decide on, the following National Luna products all support lithium-ion, LiFePO4, AGM, Calcium and wet-cell batteries.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa