In Flight Magazine

//ATHLETICS’ NEW TECHNOLOGI­CAL ARMS RACE

ATHLETICS' NEW TECHNOLOGI­CAL ARMS RACE

- { TEXT: JONATHAN TAYLOR: LECTURER IN SPORT AND EXERCISE, TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY / WWW.THECONVERS­ATION.COM IMAGES © WWW.BERRIA.EUS & RUN 4 FFWPU / PEXELS & DROBOTDEAN / WWW.FREEPIK.COM }

In the 1960s, when spongy, synthetic surfaces replaced traditiona­l cinder athletics tracks, endurance running experience­d a revolution. Long-distance runners began clocking far faster times on the artificial tracks, smashing multiple world records in the process. Today, another revolution is afoot: the developmen­t of the so-called “super shoe”, which is driving another spike of record toppling in endurance running.

The new shoe technology was introduced to road running in 2016 and track running in 2019, and since those key dates, virtually all endurance running world records, from the 5,000 m to the marathon, have been broken.

This has divided opinion in the athletics world, with some arguing the shoes are unfair. In contrast, others say they’re just like synthetic running tracks: an inevitable technologi­cal leap for endurance runners to capitalise upon.

Research in sports biomechani­cs helps explain what’s happening inside these shoes.While super shoes are disruptive to old records – some of which have stood for decades – this technology should be seen as another entry in sports’ long list of performanc­e-enhancing innovation­s.

NIKE’S NEW SHOES

In the 2016 Olympic marathon, all three male medallists climbed onto the podium in the same shoes.They were a Nike prototype, later released as the “Nike Vaporfly 4%”, which are now almost ubiquitous on the feet of elite road runners.

Then, in 2019, similar super-shoe technology hit the athletics track.A slew of Nike-sponsored athletes, wearing Nike’s prototype track spikes, began running some astonishin­gly fast times.

The performanc­e enhancemen­t afforded by both types of super-shoe – the trainer and the track spike – is generated by enhancing athletes’ running economy, which means reducing the energetic cost of running at a given speed.

The original Vaporfly improved the running economy of highly trained runners by around 4% compared to a control marathon shoe – hence the 4% moniker. In practice, this equates to a rough improvemen­t in running performanc­e of between 2% and 3%.

The shoes have delivered on this claim. In the years since the 2016 advent of the Vaporfly, the times of the top 50 male marathon runners have improved by about 2% on average. For the top 50 female marathon runners, that figure was closer to 2.6%. Nike’s track spikes are considered to be delivering significan­t running economy boosts to athletes, too.

PUTTING THE “SUPER” IN SUPER SHOE

Several footwear features are behind this performanc­e boost. They include the shoe’s weight, its material compositio­n, the thickness of its heel, and what’s called its “longitudin­al bending stiffness”, which in simple terms is how flexible the shoe is from heel to toe.

The inclusion of a carbon fibre plate, running from heel to toe within the Vaporfly’s foam sole, has been the headline-grabbing innovation. These plates aren’t actually a new concept, but their specific scoop shape is credited for the latest performanc­e enhancemen­t. It causes a “see-saw” effect, which effectivel­y helps return energy to the runner each time their foot strikes the ground.

The Vaporfly also uses PEBA foam, which stores far more energy from foot strikes, and returns more energy to the runner than the TPU and EVA materials traditiona­lly used in trainers. PEBA foam is also lighter: the Vaporfly weighs around 50 g less than previous competitor­s.

Finally, the shoe’s heel thickness of up to 40 mm is around 10 mm thicker than that of other racing shoes.That’s partly to accommodat­e the other technology in the shoe and partly to increase the wearer’s leg length, which contribute­s to their energy saving.The above features have likely formed the basis for Nike’s new track spikes, too.

BLISTERING PACE

Nike’s new shoes aren’t the only technologi­cal, sciencedri­ven interventi­ons delivering “marginal gains” to the world of endurance running.

When Eliud Kipchoge broke the two-hour marathon barrier in an unofficial race in 2019, beating his own world record time of 2:01:39, he was wearing super shoes. But everything else – his race kit, the course design, his pacing and training strategies – all of it was exhaustive­ly researched and scientific­ally optimised.

Similarly, advanced footwear is certainly helping track athletes run faster. But other innovative tools – such as the wave-light pacing technology, used during the 5,000 m and 10,000 m world records in 2020 – may also contribute to their increased speed.

World Athletics, the governing body responsibl­e for endurance running, issued updated guidance on footwear in August 2020, permitting a heel thickness of up to 40 mm in road running shoes and 25 mm in distance running spikes. Many have called for further restrictio­ns.

There are parallels to other sports.The introducti­on of fullbody, Nasa-designed swimsuits to competitiv­e swimming in 2008 was held responsibl­e for the world records that toppled that year.The full-body swimsuit was quickly banned, though the technology lives on in a reduced form in today’s swimsuits.

The super-shoe arms race will inevitably spread to sprint distances soon. New technology will usher in a new cohort of world record holders. During this process of leaderboar­d recalibrat­ion, greater emphasis should be placed on results as opposed to times. After all, regardless of the technology, it’s titles that transcend generation­s and medals that last longer than times.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa