Now bank has Hitachi in crosshairs
The company has already coughed up R268m following US securities commission charges
then chair of Eskom, had presided over the Medupi tender award and its subsequent doubling up to Kusile power station while also serving on the ANC’s national executive and its finance committee.
Lawrence Mushwana, then the public protector, confirmed Moosa’s conflict of interests, but reported he could find no improper influence in the tender process. This insistence was undermined by Monday’s SEC charges, which Hitachi agreed to settle by paying a $19-million fine.
Although Hitachi did not admit guilt when it instantly settled the SEC charge by paying a $19-million (R263-million) fine, the evidence is damning.
Apart from $5-million in dividend payments, the SEC showed Hitachi paid Chancellor House disguised “success fees” of $1.1-million in 2008 for helping land the Medupi and Kusile contracts.
The SEC said its investigation was done with the AfDB, which loaned Eskom $2.6-billion to fund contracts, such as Hitachi’s at Medupi.
An AfDB official, who asked not to be named, told amaBhungane that the bank was “pursuing proceedings separate from the SEC” against Hitachi, but did not say when an outcome may be expected.
The bank is contractually empowered to investigate and sanction contractors in the projects it finances. It can impose fines and bar offenders from further tenders it finances. It also has a “cross-debarment” agreement with the World Bank and other development financiers, which may lead them to bar Hitachi too.
The official said the joint investigation with the SEC signalled “hopefully a growing trend of co-operation” between national enforcement agencies and development financiers, because it increased chances of success. With Hitachi, the SEC did not have jurisdiction to investigate in South Africa, but the AfDB did.
The SEC fine and AfDB’s potential sanctions against Hitachi are likely to send a strong signal to international contractors that giving stakes to party funding vehicles when they seek state tenders will be regarded as corrupt under increasingly tough international anti-bribery laws.
Last month, amaBhungane unveiled Chancellor House’s stake in Colenso Power, a private power pro- ducer mounting an $18-billion bid to supply electricity to Eskom.
The SEC said Hitachi was aware that Chancellor House was a funding vehicle for the ANC during the bidding process. “Hitachi nevertheless continued to partner with Chancellor and encourage Chancellor’s use of its political influence to help obtain the government contracts.”
The SEC alleged Chancellor House “networked to help schedule meetings with government officials and lobbied on behalf of” Hitachi during the bid. A Hitachi memorandum weeks before Eskom awarded the Medupi boiler contract to it in October 2007 was optimistic because the “balance of political power” in the Eskom board was “ANC driven” and “currently in our favour”.
ANC treasurer general Zweli Mkhize said in a statement this week that the ANC was “not involved in the transaction between Hitachi and Chancellor House, nor do we have any information on any impropriety relating to the award of the Medupi or Kusile contracts to Hitachi”.
This week Moosa said he’d “left no stone unturned” to ensure fair tenders for the power stations by commissioning Deloitte to review procurement processes. “At that time I was chairman of Eskom but at the same time in the leadership of the ANC and I had to be absolutely certain there was no political influence.”
Deloitte’s remit included whether Eskom officials were conflicted. Although its reports have never been made public, it appears the consulting firm failed to see the elephant in the room — that Moosa did not recuse himself despite his conflict.
Moosa said the “real question” was lack of transparency in political funding — “an unfinished part … of our otherwise great Constitution”.