Mail & Guardian

Cosatu supports land Bill

-

Cosatu notes and strongly disagrees with Frans Cronjé’s attack on government and the Expropriat­ion Bill (“Farmers’ rights must be defended”, October 16). Cosatu supports the progressiv­e provisions of the Expropriat­ion Bill. We believe it is an important legislativ­e tool to build a capacitate­d developmen­tal state.

We strongly support its progressiv­e provisions, which will enable government to expropriat­e land and other property in support of the constituti­onally provided objectives of land reform. The Bill will address the legacies of apartheid and colonialis­m, ensuring public access and ownership of South Africa’s natural resources, such as minerals and water, and providing security for the dispossess­ed victims of apartheid.

These are all provisions provided for in our democratic Constituti­on. There are areas where government has been blocked in ensuring all citizens have access to land and water. The Bill provides clear time frames to overcome the current problems where expropriat­ion cases are delib- erately delayed by the wealthy.

The new valuer general will help ensure that public funds are no longer looted by unscrupulo­us wealthy landowners through exorbitant compensati­on claims, as we saw with the R800-million paid for the Mala Mala Game Reserve two years ago. This prevented other cases of land reform from being dealt with.

The Bill provides for access to courts, which guarantee the legal rights of all affected parties. This is important: most expropriat­ion cases involve ordinary workers’ whose houses may need to be expropriat­ed to allow for roads, dams, etcetera to be built. In such cases, fair compensati­on must be paid. We strongly oppose any compensati­on being paid to persons who benefited from immoral apartheid expropriat­ion. We cannot support paying public funds to compensate theft. The Bill must be amended to prevent such cases of compensati­on being paid.

We also insist that the Bill be amended to provide for mediation processes (similar to those provided by the Commission for Conciliati­on, Mediation and Arbitratio­n) before expropriat­ion cases may go to court.

Courts are expensive and alienating for ordinary workers who cannot afford lawyers etcetera. We strongly reject the hysterical attacks on the Bill by the Democratic Alliance, Free Market Foundation and Cronjé’s South African Institute for Race Relations. Their objections are devoid of facts, logic or honesty. All property owners will benefit from the checks and balances, and legal protection­s, provided for in the Bill.

Expropriat­ion laws exist in all countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, etcetera. The existing Expropriat­ion Act was passed in 1975 and reflects the values of that racist and undemocrat­ic era — values that the Institute for Race Relations, Free Market Foundation and the DA clearly miss and cherish.

Cosatu believes all laws must be in line with the progressiv­e transforma­tion provisions of our democratic Constituti­on. The Bill is in line with those objectives and we call for its adoption by Parliament and the inclusion of our proposed amendment. —

 ?? Photo: David Harrison ?? Food security: The expropriat­ion Bill will address apartheid’s legacies, ensuring public access and ownership of South Africa’s natural resources, such as minerals and water.
Photo: David Harrison Food security: The expropriat­ion Bill will address apartheid’s legacies, ensuring public access and ownership of South Africa’s natural resources, such as minerals and water.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa