Mail & Guardian

Oakbay ticks AGM box in 12 minutes

- Phillip de Wet

It took just 12 minutes last Friday for Oakbay Resources, the listed Gupta family corporate vehicle, to check the last compliance box for the financial year — after coming perilously close to forceful delisting just months ago.

It did so by literally getting back on script.

“I’m sensing there are no questions coming,” said company chairperso­n Terry Rensen, before closing off the annual general meeting, brief even by the rubber-stamping standards of such meetings.

For almost all of the meeting Rensen read from his copy of a printed text, with prominent indication­s in red where he was to pause after asking rote questions and notes for other directors on what motions they were to second.

As a result the documents that were to be considered at the meeting, notably its annual financial statements, were taken as read and the ordinary and special resolution­s of the meeting were quickly “passed by the requisite number of votes”, Rensen announced.

Though it had every appearance of a drama enacted purely for the sake of the written record, the meeting put Oakbay in compliance with the requiremen­t for listed companies to hold AGMs where shareholde­rs can interrogat­e directors.

Shareholde­rs voted almost unanimousl­y to give directors powers to issue shares for cash, buy back shares, and extend loans and other financial assistance to related companies. These powers could come in handy as the Gupta family seeks to exit all their South African holdings, as they have vowed to do “by the end of the year”. Yet the same powers had been voted for by the board at its 2015 AGM, as part of standard provisions most companies make.

In late August Gupta family spokespers­on Gary Naidoo said the family wanted to exit all investment­s for the sake of employees and the country.

At the time Oakbay Resources, on paper a vast part of the family’s wealth, was in bad shape. With the AGM out of the way, however, all impediment­s to a continued listing on the JSE now appear to have been removed.

On the last day of August Oakbay delivered what appeared to be a hastily assembled annual integrated report for the year ending February 2016 just seven hours before a JSEimposed deadline to do so expired.

Two major sections of the report, on the market environmen­t for uranium (which it plans to mine in future) and coal (a big part of its current business), were lifted verbatim from competing companies. After the Mail & Guardian pointed this out, the company issued a correction notice acknowledg­ing those competitor­s as sources.

A day later the company announced it had appointed River Group as its JSE sponsor.

Oakbay’s previous sponsor, Sasfin Bank, had resigned with effect from the beginning of June. It would ultimately take a search of nearly six months to find a willing replacemen­t sponsor.

By contrast it took Oakbay less than a month to replace as audi- tors KMPG, which resigned at the end of March citing “associatio­n risk”. The position was filled by SizweNtsal­ubaGobodo before the end of April.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa