Mail & Guardian

GDED boasts unqualifie­d audits

- Charles Molele

Led by Honourable Chairperso­n: Errol Magerman, the Portfolio Committee on Economic Developmen­t, Environmen­t, Agricultur­e and Rural Developmen­t, received the Department’s 2015/16 Annual Report at a public meeting on Tuesday, 1 November in Rabie Ridge.

The Gauteng Department of Economic Developmen­t (GDED) and its public agencies have received unqualifie­d audits from the auditorgen­eral (AG) during the 2015/2016 financial year.

The Department’s agencies include among others the Gauteng Enterprise Propeller (GEP), Dinokeng, Cradle of Human Kind World heritage site, IDZ Developmen­t Company, Constituti­onal Hill Precinct, Gauteng Gambling Board (CGB), Gauteng Tourism Authority (GTA), and the Greater Newtown Developmen­t Company (GNDC).

In this period under review, the majority of department­al agencies received reduced allocation­s, namely: Gauteng Growth and Developmen­t Agency (GGDA), GEP, GTA, and Gauteng Liquor Board (GLB). The only agencies with increased allocation­s are Cradle of Humankind and Dinokeng, which received increases of R21.2-million and R28-million respective­ly. The GDED is headed up by MEC Lebogang Maile, and plays a very strategic role in the economic developmen­t of the province.

It’s strategic objectives are aligned with the National and Provincial priorities as well as working towards the realisatio­n of Millennium Developmen­t Goals (MDGs) such as MDG 1 on eradicatin­g extreme poverty and MDG 8 on developing global partnershi­ps for economic developmen­t.

Out of the budgeted amount of R1 305 610 000, the GDED has spent R1 270 844 000, translatin­g to 97.34%.

In the AG’s opinion, the financial statements of the GDED present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position of the department as at March 31 2016 and are in line with treasury regulation­s and the Public Finance Management Act.

The Committee added that there were no material findings or matters of emphasis raised by the AG and that it was important to mention that the GDED and most of its agencies and entities have received unqualifie­d audits with no findings. Only the GEP, GNDC and GLB received unqualifie­d audits with findings.

The Committee noted that the agencies have delivered on most of their projects, but said they still required close monitoring. It said there were shortcomin­gs in terms of realising strategic economic infrastruc­ture projects such as the Special Economic Zone (SEZ). Furthermor­e, having noted the number of jobs facilitate­d, the department is encouraged to report consistent­ly on jobs facilitate­d for each programme.

This analysis is aimed at assisting the Committee in considerin­g the 2015/16 annual report, and to help provide a meaningful engagement with the department on matters of concern raised.

It will further contribute substantia­lly in the nature of the oversight report to be produced by the Committee, and in turn be tabled to the House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa