Mail & Guardian

Universiti­es’ inclusion of disabled students is limited

- Oliver Mutanga Oliver Mutanga is a Marie Curie Scientia research fellow at the University of Oslo

It has been a decade since South Africa ratified and signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabiliti­es but not much seems to have changed.

About 2.9-million South Africans — roughly 7.5% of the population — live with some form of disability. But those with disabiliti­es make up less than 1% of the total student population, a group that struggles to enjoy fairness and justice in the way in which they are treated at universiti­es.

As part of a study, I interviewe­d 14 of them from two universiti­es. I wanted to hear about their daily experience­s and to find out how they’re included — or not — in making decisions about their education and opportunit­ies.

It is often assumed that including people with disabiliti­es in public projects is good and excluding them is bad. But this approach fails to question the subtle dynamics of “inclusion”. Proper inclusion implies multidimen­sional support that is financial, social and academic, and must be supported by policies. It is not enough to regard physical access and the presence of students with disabiliti­es as inclusive.

My research showed that very few students with disabiliti­es feel included.

The other problem with the current notion of inclusion in the higher education system is that students with disabiliti­es are lumped together as a homogeneou­s group.

Authoritie­s adopt a one-size-fitsall approach rather than realising that there’s a difference between a wheelchair user and someone who is visually impaired. Students with disabiliti­es are not all the same.

Universiti­es are reluctant to change any of their systems or structures. The approach of university authoritie­s appears to be that students with disabiliti­es must fit into existing structures rather than that the institutio­ns must change to accommodat­e them.

Education authoritie­s seem to think it’s enough to offer financial support. One example of this is the National Student Financial Aid Scheme’s (NSFAS) bursary for students with disabiliti­es.

But money is not enough to guarantee inclusion. The students said that universiti­es’ day-to-day operations and systems perpetuate­d structural and ideologica­l barriers. At the one university, only one of the postgradua­tes residences could accommodat­e students with wheelchair­s.

This made the wheelchair-bound students feel isolated. They reported feeling undervalue­d and somehow “impaired”.

What can be done to ensure such students feel genuinely included?

Universiti­es must move beyond measuring inclusion based only on the number of students with disabiliti­es they have enrolled each year. Instead, they must work to create more equitable, just education for students with disabiliti­es. Every institutio­n needs to undertake a detailed investigat­ion of the barriers these students face.

Without a broader understand­ing of disability, it will be difficult to address the complex ways in which inequaliti­es develop and are sustained. This can be achieved. One of the institutio­ns on which I based my research, the University of the Free State, has put in place several initia- tives to help students with disabiliti­es. Its Centre for Universal Access and Disability Support provides specialise­d support services, including individual tutor sessions and an amanuensis (scribe) service during tests and exams.

Other universiti­es are improving their systems for students with disabiliti­es: the University of Venda does Braille printing and provides students with disabiliti­es with computer training.

Genuinely including students with disabiliti­es will lead to the developmen­t of an appropriat­e approach to diversity and the creation of environmen­ts in which all students will have the opportunit­y to flourish. — theconvers­ation.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa