Mail & Guardian

Kenyan voting comes of age

Two locals who have voted in every election since 1992 can recall the bad old days

- Njeri Kimani

It is easy to forget — amid the fears of post-election violence, amid the candidates crying foul, amid scary newspaper headlines and even scarier political rhetoric — just how far Kenya’s democracy has come in the past 25 years.

William Kingori Kihara has not forgotten. He was there in 1992, then aged 27, when Kenyans voted in the first multiparty election since independen­ce. Daniel Arap Moi was in charge and he would go on to win that election, becoming the first Kenyan president to be chosen directly by the people.

Kingori wasn’t too sure whether he would bother to vote but his friends put pressure on him and, eventually, he got swept up in the general excitement that accompanie­d the vote.

It was a very different type of election compared with today’s relatively high-tech approach.

Instead of filling in and casting ballots in secret, voters had to queue behind a photo of the candidate they were backing. Poll agents would then count the number of voters in each queue, and that’s how many votes each candidate would receive.

“We would wait in line, for hours, until everyone was cleared from the register, after which the head count would start,” Kingori said.

The system, popularly known as mlolongo, or queue, was easily abused. Voters in the “wrong” queue were targeted for intimidati­on and even physical harassment, and there was no way to verify the final tallies for each polling station. Flaws in the voter registrati­on process meant that voters could easily queue at more than one polling station, and thus were counted more than once.

But Kingori says that he doesn’t remember witnessing any ballot rigging.

“I’m not sure whether it was fear or total honesty that prevented people from literally cheating their way into the leader they wanted. There wasn’t much keenness in the accreditat­ion process as witnessed in the subsequent elections,” he said.

Nonetheles­s, the system encouraged patronage and poor governance, and landed Kenyans with a particular­ly poor crop of leaders.

“We were often slapped with illiterate, tribal and abusive leaders, all because they were in the reigning president’s good books. Hence, we were derailed in terms of developmen­t and economic status as a country,” he said.

Kingori has voted in every election since. In this week’s election, he cast his ballot in Bahati, an area about 300km from Nairobi, which is renowned for growing avocados. He’s a security guard at a school there.

He marvels at how sophistica­ted voting has become.

“It was perfect. There was proper organisati­on and ample security to guard both the votes and the voters. There was proper management of the tallying centres, which is a unique phenomenon. The introducti­on of queuing clerks to guide you through the casting of votes was unheard of before,” he said.

Kenya’s Independen­t Electoral and Boundaries Commission went to great lengths to ensure the 2017 vote was efficient and tamper-free. The new integrated election management system was supposed to achieve this by using biometric identifica­tion of voters and introducin­g electronic voting. It didn’t work everywhere, however, with some polling stations reporting long delays when the biometric recognitio­n software failed.

And the electronic system opened up the electoral commission to new claims of cheating: on the morning after Tuesday’s vote, opposition leader Raila Odinga claimed that the electoral database had been hacked and that the provisiona­l results, which pointed to a substantia­l win for incumbent President Uhuru Kenyatta, were therefore fraudulent.

Jane Wanjiku Karanja, 55, has seen all this before. She is another veteran voter, having first cast her vote at a polling station in Webuye in western Kenya, also in 1992.

“It was when I discovered the sweetness of the vote. The feeling of being able to make decisions as to who would govern me for the next five years was exhilarati­ng,” she said.

But the act of voting itself was confusing and a little scary. “It was chaotic and intimidati­ng, especially if your friend spotted you in a different queue while he was an aspirant.

“Candidates would campaign openly even as the voting process was going on. Often times, there was chaos in the evening and, in the process, ballot papers would disappear before the final tallying while en route to the overall tallying centre,” she said.

In subsequent elections, Wanjiku said a large police presence at polling stations would scare voters into supporting the ruling party.

Unlike Kingori, she’s not entirely sure that things have improved for the better. She said there were too many candidates on the ballot paper, and voters were asked to vote on too many different positions. Voting had become cumbersome.

“It is an unnecessar­y burden to the taxpayer, especially since we have to fund the elections. It has also turned out to be a very slow process, even with the introducti­on of the machines. For instance, I queued for four hours whereas I used to spend one hour waiting to cast my vote,” she said.

Despite her grumbles, she will still be voting in the next election, and the one after that. So will Kingori.

They know that Kenya’s democracy, flawed as it may be, is better than what came before.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Witness to change: William Kingori Kihara and Jane Wanjiku Karanja have both voted in every election since 1992, but they disagree about some of the changes that have taken place. Photos: Njeri Kimani
Witness to change: William Kingori Kihara and Jane Wanjiku Karanja have both voted in every election since 1992, but they disagree about some of the changes that have taken place. Photos: Njeri Kimani

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa