Lessons from transformation at universities
Though strides have been made in bringing about change, a number of issues are still to be included
In the past three years, university students in South Africa led countrywide protests demanding transformation, an end to outsourcing of contract workers and free quality education. In the mainstream media and literature, these protests have been branded as the Fallist Movement based on their various themes: #Rhodesmustfall, #Outsourcingmustfall, #Sexualharassmentmust Fall and #Feesmustfall.
This demonstrated the potent role and agency of youth and students on a scale that was seen in the 1970s and 1980s at the height of the antiapartheid struggle. Many universities and academics had long lost the appetite or intensity for transformation and quest for social justice and they had to respond or react to these demands.
Many universities have embraced transformation as an imperative that seeks to eradicate colonial, apartheid and imperial legacies while also repositioning the higher education sector for global competitiveness and relevance. Society has generally shifted its focus away from transformation programmes and this is largely a result of our obsession with ever-changing headlines of dramatic stories such as protests, corruption and scandals.
As a consequence, little, if any effort is being made to assess progress, regression or stagnation of transformation at universities. Furthermore, some informative literature analysing student-led protests for social justice is emerging away from the mainstream media headlines. These include The Struggle for #Feesmustfall: We Are No Longer at Ease edited by Wandile and Busani Ngcaweni, and Fees Must Fall: Student Revolt, Decolonisation and Governance in South Africa by Susan Booysen, Gillian Godsell and Rekgotsofetse Chikane and Sizwe Mpofu-walsh.
But most of this literature is an analysis of the nature of protests rather than an account of what is emerging out of efforts to transform.
This article is an overview that highlights some lessons from transformation efforts at Unisa and the South African university sector. I am mindful of the fact that complexities and variations of transformation programmes cannot be adequately expressed in the confines of this short article.
Gender eclipsed
Various articulations of transformation have foregrounded racial issues as a whole, often overlooking gender and other social strata of reproduction of social injustice in society. Most of the discourse and literature on decolonisation and Africanisation has mainly focused on the racial dimension, with the gender agenda receiving marginal attention.
This is a weakness that needs intervention at its early stages because it has been demonstrated in our history of post-colonial Africa that African nationalism does not automatically resolve gender problems.
Social vs hardcore sciences
The conceptual, theoretical and philosophical foundation of university transformation discourse is often led by social sciences and presented as a template for other fields such as pure science and engineering as well as other professional fields such as accounting, health, economics and management sciences.
This has caused tension and perception of imposition instead of cocreation and co-determination of the terms of transformation.
Social sciences are more advanced in critical theory and have dedicated more time and effort to develop tools for analysing the weaknesses in our education systems. There is an urgent need to affirm the principle of cocreation and a reciprocal dialogue among these disciplines to advance the transformation of content and pedagogy.
Multilingual dilemma
Although there is general agreement about the principle of promoting multilingualism at universities, there is no consensus on how to operationalise this in practical terms.
Resentment of Afrikaans as a symbol of apartheid control and exclusion has led to a call for the removal of a official bilingual language policy, which translated into an immediate endorsement of a monolingual English domination by default because development of other African languages is a long-term process.
Rising monolingualism is a reality of unintended consequences with the hope that, over time, other African languages will be developed to be offered or used as an academic and research languages in the mainstream.
Local vs global
Part of the resistance to transformation of the curriculum is based on a misplaced notion that contextually based and locally focused or grounded studies will not be rigorous enough to be globally competitive.
Indigenous technologies
Most of the mainstream literature tends to focus almost exclusively on the political history of precolonial Africa, with little or no attention given to science and technology achievements. Cumulatively, this has created an impression that Africa made no contribution to human civilisations in the area of science and technology.
In this literature there is no comparative work that also factors in the role of Asian and indigenous American civilisations, which also contributed immensely to human and societal advancement.
Contested dimensions
The primary focus in the transformation of curriculum, pedagogy, symbols and names has not extended to a clear grasp of dominant institutional cultures in universities on other dimensions of transformation such as procurement trends as well as the staff composition of those producing knowledge or leading research.
There is a lot of work to be done to give full attention to all these dimensions.
The transformation programme at our universities is beginning to yield results, despite facing subtle resistance disguised in all forms such as the ones conflating high standards with the preservation of the status quo.
The transformation of our universities is a national imperative given the legacy they inherited, but it will also give them contextual relevance and competitive edge if successfully implemented.
Professor Mandla Makhanya is the principal and vice-chancellor of Unisa