Mail & Guardian

SIU heeds the ‘more orange overalls’ call

In an interview with the Mail & Guardian Data Desk, the head of the country’s premier forensic investigat­ion division — the Special Investigat­ing Unit — said it is fixing internal problems and is focused on the public’s demand to see more criminals behind

-

After years of backlogs and perceived political interferen­ce, the Special Investigat­ing Unit (SIU) is getting its act together and understand­s that the public wants the “big fish” in “orange overalls”.

The Mail & Guardian this week sat down in a no-holds-barred interview with the head of the unit, Advocate Andy Mothibi — who has been at the helm for three years.

With the corrupt seeming to act with impunity, he admitted that there is pressure on the unit to ensure consequenc­es. “The public are saying that they would like to see people in orange overalls, this is very important. People must be held to account, they must be arrested, prosecuted and sentenced.”

To this end, he promised arrests at Eskom and Transnet in the near future.

There is also the matter of the hundreds of billions of rand that have been looted from state entities. Mothibi added that: “There is the civil part of recovery that is also as important as for the state to get its money back.”

These are things at the core of the unit’s responsibi­lity — investigat­ing looting, corruption and malpractic­e in state entities. The unit has widerangin­g powers. But they can only be applied under very specific conditions, after someone approaches the unit with a concrete case that needs to be investigat­ed (and only if that case is not being investigat­ed by another organ of state).

If a case ticks these boxes, the SIU then asks the president to sign a proclamati­on. This then allows it to exercise its significan­t powers: to issue subpoenas for informatio­n, search and seizures as well as the power to interrogat­e potential witnesses.

The unit reports directly to the department of justice and constituti­onal developmen­t and works closely with the National Prosecutin­g Authority (NPA), the South African Revenue Service (Sars) and the Hawks when arrests need to be made.

To make a dent in the hundreds of billions of rands that have been stolen, the SIU is finalising cases that deal with Eskom and Transnet. It is also working to have contracts worth R3.7-billion set aside. These range from the appointmen­ts of Trillian and Regiments Capital to render services, to the maladminis­tration that occurred in relation to the Medupi and Kusile power station projects. Investigat­ions are also being done into the SABC, water and sanitation department and multi-billion rand fleet contracts that had been awarded by the City of Johannesbu­rg.

Mothibi told the M&G that the unit has been working closely with the NPA to wrap up a number of cases relating to the three parastatal­s.

“We expect some arrests in those sectors as we’ve been working very closely with the investigat­ive directorat­e at the NPA. In fact, we have really assisted one another in making sure that there’s traction in those proclamati­ons that we’ve been investigat­ing at Eskom, Transnet, and Prasa [Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa].”

All of this is part of what seems to be an escalation of activity by the unit.

This is a recent phenomenon. An M&G analysis of the unit’s investigat­ive data, going back five years, shows that it has not been good at meeting its own targets.

In 2014, just 12 proclamati­ons were issued. A proclamati­on is what the unit sends to the president to sign off, which then allows it to formally investigat­e allegation­s. Once these investigat­ions have been completed, the SIU either starts civil litigation or refers the case for disciplina­ry action, or criminal prosecutio­n by the NPA.

Back in 2014, 174 referrals were made to the NPA.

This financial year, 20 proclamati­ons were signed off by President Cyril Ramaphosa. The number of referrals has also almost doubled, with 331 cases referred to the NPA. These range from allegation­s of corruption and maladminis­tration to unlawful conduct at entities such as the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa), the water and sanitation department as well a host of municipali­ties.

It means that these entities — and people in them — can now be prosecuted.

That is if the unit can catch up on its backlog. Three of the cases date all the way back to 2010. One of these deals with allegation­s of unlawful payment of social grants in respect of deceased or fictitious people by Sassa.

There is also a probe into irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditur­e incurred by the department of public works, which made payments that were not owed.

The unit was also still investigat­ing the Tshwane Metropolit­an Municipali­ty where officials were paid allowances and other benefits that were not due to them, as well

as the mismanagem­ent of finances and resources of the municipali­ty. These cases were finalised only last year and the reports sent to the presidency.

Other state entities, such as arms company Denel and Prasa, are also part of cases that have been sent to a newly establishe­d tribunal, which is sitting at the Booysens magistrate’s court. That tribunal was specifical­ly set up — in October — to deal with cases emanating from SIU investigat­ions, because of the backlog facing courts.

According to Mothibi, there are also six Life Esidimeni cases that are before the tribunal to the value of about R5-million that must be reclaimed from the non-government­al institutio­ns. “Though it doesn’t sound like a big amount, this [Life Esidimeni — where 143 people died in psychiatri­c care] created a lot of pain to the public and we would like to make sure that whoever is responsibl­e is held to account,” he said.

In the case of the Nkandla upgrades to the former President Jacob Zuma’s home, the investigat­ion and any consequenc­es have been stuck in a court process since 2013.

And, although the SIU filed papers for damages of over R155-million against Minenhle Makhanya, the architect for the Nkandla upgrades, back in 2014, no money has yet been recovered.

Mothibi said: “We are currently engaging with the high court judges, to assist us in fast-tracking many of these cases. But from now on most of our civil litigation cases that we have full control over will be referred to the tribunal so we can recover funds quicker and return them to the specific entity.”

Responding to M&G questions about the perception that, under the previous president, there had been little in the way of consequenc­es for the corrupt — and political interferen­ce in units such as the SIU —

Mothibi said that there has been no political interferen­ce that they have dealt with.

“There is not one instance where I have seen in my experience that the president has ever turned down or refused to sign a proclamati­on. The SIU has been able to do its work.

“And obviously, the SIU leadership itself is very key to ensure that it executes on its work. So up until today, it’s really just been operationa­l improvemen­ts. But we really have to make sure to avoid all of those instances where cases date back to five, six, and seven years,” he said.

Rather than political interferen­ce, he pointed to bottleneck­s being the reason that fewer cases were handled in the past.

The main ones were the fact that investigat­ors at a provincial and national level all had to report to one centre, and wide-ranging proclamati­ons that stopped the unit narrowing down on a crime that could be prosecuted.

The solution, he said, has been to “run [provinces] as independen­t cost centres. If you have proclamati­ons in the province, they should be focused on that so you don’t have all these lines blurred”.

One of those provincial cases is that of the Amahlathi municipali­ty, where last week the municipal manager Balisa King Socikwa and Kwane Capital’s director, Mcebisi Mlonzi, were arrested for fraud to the tune of R92-million. Charges against them include money laundering and contravent­ion of the Municipal Finance Management Act. This investigat­ion dates back to 2016.

For its work, the SIU is paid by the entities that call it in to conduct an investigat­ion. Some of these entities, however, have not paid, with half a billion rand owed to it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa