Healers need new formal spaces
Proper facilities, supported by well-researched cultural principles, will go a long way towards improving the image and perception of the practice of traditional medicine in South Africa
African traditional medicine and its practices were prohibited under the pretext of witchcraft in South Africa by the British and, later, the apartheid government.
This led to secrecy in the practice and a lack of infrastructure planning to support it.
As a result, traditional healthcare practices are largely informal and unregulated. This raises questions about accessibility and patient safety, as well as the accountability of healers. Traditional health practices make use of symbolic rituals and natural products, including local plants. They also follow certain cultural rules about privacy. And they require specific spatial qualities in terms of scale, sequencing, light and materials.
In 2007 the South African government gazetted the Traditional Health Practitioners Act to officially recognise the practice of traditional medicine. But little has been done to develop formal spaces for traditional-healing practices — especially in an urban context. Most healers still practise in their houses, where there is little privacy for patients, and their families are exposed to ill people. Others use more private back rooms. But these spaces aren’t designed for the practice of traditional medicine.
The spaces where traditional medicine is practised are important because they assist with the healing process. These spaces play an indispensable role in helping patients to get better. Unlike biomedicine, African traditional healing is holistic: as well as the patient’s symptoms it considers the person as a whole and their social relationships.
During the consultation, landscapes, buildings and their elements, such as materials and plants, gain symbolic meaning to the patient, through their use by the healer. The setting, the herbal component and the dialogue with the healer provide a physical comfort and a sense of cultural belonging to the patient; all of these components, combined, are responsible for the healing.
For this reason, there’s a dire need for architectural design insight into the best qualities for spaces that could house these cultural rituals of healing. Guidelines are needed for the design and construction of landscapes and buildings for traditional health practitioners in South Africa — in the same way as the country has guidelines for clinics and hospitals.
Proper facilities, supported by wellresearched cultural principles for layout and design, will go a long way towards improving the image and perception of the practice of traditional medicine.
Bringing together the perspectives of architectural design and the cultural use of medicinal plants, we are working on research that aims to develop guidelines for the design and construction of landscapes and spaces for traditional health practitioners in South Africa
About 80% of South Africans consult traditional healers and there are more than 200 000 traditional healers in the country. Most of them are based in rural areas. Many South Africans still use traditional medicine for their primary healthcare needs. This is because traditional healthcare practitioners are often more accessible and affordable. They are familiar with the community and their cultural practices and beliefs.
Most rural villages in South Africa continue to have resident traditional healers. Some of these villages even have large traditional markets that remain functional, such as Mona Market in Nongoma, Kwazulu-natal.
But traditional health practice isn’t relegated to rural areas only.
It is widely practised in major cities such as Durban and Johannesburg. Because of demand, some municipalities have donated infrastructure for the healers to practise and sell their traditional medicine. Examples of state-funded infrastructure include the Mai-mai and Faraday markets in Johannesburg and Warwick Junction in ethekwini. In the country’s capital, Pretoria, healers trade and consult freely in informal markets and a few small private businesses such as in Marabastad.
These markets are well established and attract considerable trade. But they are not ideal, because they were initially designed for other purposes, such as horse stables in the case of Mai-mai Market. They lack the basics needed for trade and hygiene, such as water, good lighting and ablutions. In addition, the spaces don’t reflect African cultural identity through their design and material qualities. These qualities, which include elements such as hierarchy, scale, order, use of light, colour and artefacts, are essential design considerations for the healing experience in traditional health practices.
Urban public spaces in South Africa were, and often still are, either Eurocentric in design or designed in a modernist international style. These spaces were not designed for African lifestyles and needs. This can be attributed to the legacy of apartheid ideals and spatial planning: to keep people apart on the basis of race and ethnicity and to discourage the permanent presence of black people in cities.
Through strong commitment to funding and research, the governments of China, India and Japan have developed and institutionalised their respective traditional healthcare systems. In these countries, the practice and trade of traditional medicine and the design of its buildings and spaces are largely regulated.
This is in sharp contrast to South Africa and sub-saharan Africa in general, where there is a lack of funding and research into traditional medicine. Since the adoption of the Traditional Health Practitioners Act in 2007, the South African government has not invested resources for funding and research to develop guidelines for the spaces of traditional healers.
It must be borne in mind that biomedicine used to be traditional medicine. But it developed through continued research and funding. The design guidelines of biomedicine facilities, including clinics and hospitals, have been well supported in South Africa. But traditional health practitioners are poorly regulated and, thus, undermined by the biomedical practitioners.
Properly designed facilities could provide comfortable access to traditional medicine for all members of society. Healers who have been previously marginalised deserve to practise in facilities that embody their world view and identity. To take rightful ownership of the process, it is important for them to be heard and involved in the development of design guidelines.
This is an edited version of an article first published by The Conversation. John Molebatsi is a PHD candidate, Christina Breed is a senior lecturer and Gary Ivan Stafford is a lecturer/researcher, all at the University of Pretoria