Mail & Guardian

Godzilla vs Kong: Who wins?

The upcoming film pits these two iconic movie monsters against each other. A scientist takes a look at who would likely emerge the victor

- Kiersten Formoso

Even the most fantastica­l creatures have some basis in scientific reality, so the natural world is a good place to look to better understand movie monsters. I study evolution in extinct animals and functional morphology — how skeletal and tissue traits allow animals to move. I am also a huge fan of monster movies.

Ultimately, this is a fight between a giant reptile and a giant primate, and there are relative biological advantages and disadvanta­ges that each would have. The research I do on morphology and biomechani­cs can tell us a lot about this battle and might help you decide between #Teamgodzil­la and #Teamkong.

Larger than life

First it’s important to realise that both Kong and Godzilla are definitely far beyond the realms of biological possibilit­y. This is due to sheer size and the laws of physics. Their hearts couldn’t pump blood to their heads, they would have temperatur­e regulation problems and it would take too long for nerve signals from the brain to reach distant parts of the body — to name just a few issues.

However, let’s assume that somehow Godzilla and Kong are able to overcome these size limitation­s — perhaps because of their radiation exposure they have distinctiv­e mutations and characteri­stics. Based on how they look on the big screen, let’s explore the observable difference­s that might prove useful in a fight.

Kong: mix of ape and human

At first glance, Kong is a colossal primate, but he’s not simply a giant gorilla.

One of the most striking things about Kong is his upright, bipedal stance — he mostly walks on two legs, unlike any other living nonhuman apes. This ability could suggest a close evolutiona­ry relationsh­ip to the only living upright ape, humans — or his upright stance could be the result of convergent evolution. Either way, Kong has thick muscular legs geared toward walking and running, and large free arms with grasping hands, enabling him to use tools.

Humanity’s bipedal, upright posture is unique in the animal kingdom and provides a number of biomechani­cal abilities that Kong might share. For example, human torsos are highly flexible and particular­ly good at rotation. This feature — in addition to our loose shoulder girdle — makes humans the best throwers in the animal kingdom. Throwing is helpful in a fight, and Kong could probably throw with the best of them.

Kong is also, of course, massive. He absolutely dwarfs the largest known primate, an extinct orangutan relative called Gigantopit­hecus that was a bit bigger than modern gorillas.

Kong does have many gorilla like attributes as well, including long muscular arms, a short snout with large canine teeth, and a tall sagittal crest — a ridge of bone on his head that would be the anchor point for exceptiona­lly strong jaw muscles.

Strong, agile, comfortabl­e on land and with the unparallel­ed ability to use tools and throw, Kong would be a brutal force in a fight.

Godzilla: re-evovled reptile

Godzilla appears to be a giant, semiaquati­c reptile. Like Kong, Godzilla has the traits of a few different species.

Recent Godzilla movies show him decently mobile on land, but seemingly much more comfortabl­e in the water despite his lack of overt aquatic features. Interestin­gly, Godzilla is depicted with gills on his neck — a trait that land vertebrate­s lost after they emerged from the sea about 370 million years ago.

Given Godzilla’s terrestria­l features, it’s likely that his species has reptile ancestors that lived on land and re-evolved a mostly aquatic lifestyle — similar to creatures like sea turtles or sea snakes, which can actually absorb oxygen through their skin in water. Godzilla may have uniquely re-evolved gills.

Godzilla’s tail is what really separates him from Kong. It is massive, and anchored and moved by huge muscles attached to his legs, hips and lower back.

Dinosaurs like Tyrannosau­rus rex stood horizontal­ly and used their tails for balance and to help them walk and run. Godzilla, in contrast, stands vertically and keeps his tail low to the ground, probably for a different type of balance. This vertical posture is unique for a two-legged reptile and more resembles a standing kangaroo.

Godzilla stands on two muscular, pillarlike legs similar to those of a sauropod dinosaur. These would provide stability and help support his gargantuan mass but would also bolster the strength of his tail.

In addition to his powerful tail, Godzilla carries three rows of sharp spikes going down his back, thick scaly skin, a relatively small head full of carnivorou­s teeth and free arms with grasping hands, all built onto a muscular body. Taken together, Godzilla is a terrifying and intimidati­ng adversary.

Ready, fight!

So now that we’ve looked a little closer at how Godzilla and Kong are built, let’s imagine who might emerge victorious in battle.

Though Kong is a little bit smaller than Godzilla, both are more or less comparably massive in size and neither has a clear advantage here. So what about their fighting abilities?

Godzilla would likely favour his robust tail for both offence and defence — much like modern-day large lizards that use their strong tails as whips. Scale up that strength to Godzilla’s size, and that tail becomes a lethal weapon — which he has used before.

However, Kong is more comfortabl­e on land, faster and more agile, can use his strong legs to jump, and possesses much stronger arms than Godzilla — Kong probably packs a walloping punch. And as an ape, Kong would also likely use tools to some degree and might even capitalise on his throwing ability.

Both would have a nasty bite, with Kong likely getting a slight advantage. However, Godzilla’s bite is by no means weak, and all of his teeth are flesh-piercing, similar to crocodile and monitor lizard teeth.

On defence, Godzilla has the edge, with thick scaly skin and sharp spikes. He might even act like a porcupine, turning his back to a rapidly approachin­g threat. However, Kong’s superior agility on land should be able to offer him some protection as well.

I will admit I am #Teamgodzil­la, but it’s very close. I may give a slight edge to Kong in broad terrestria­l battle ability, but Godzilla’s general mass, defence and tail would be hard to overpower. And lest we forget, the tipping point for Godzilla is that he has atomic breath! Until researcher­s find evidence of a dinosaur or animal with something like that, though, I will have to reserve my scientific judgment.

Regardless of who emerges victorious, this battle will be one for the ages, and I am excited as both a scientist and monster movie fan.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? Photos: Warner Bros, Mark Witton and Orlaimagen/depositpho­tos ?? A battle for the ages: Godzilla vs. Kong shows the clash between an immense lizard and a titanic primate. Although entirely fantastica­l, the creatures have glimmers of real biological aspects of the animals they are modelled on – aside, that is, from Godzilla’s atomic breath
Photos: Warner Bros, Mark Witton and Orlaimagen/depositpho­tos A battle for the ages: Godzilla vs. Kong shows the clash between an immense lizard and a titanic primate. Although entirely fantastica­l, the creatures have glimmers of real biological aspects of the animals they are modelled on – aside, that is, from Godzilla’s atomic breath

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa