Mail & Guardian

Total’s climate-change lies since 1971

The oil giant knew the risks long before it became a public issue, spent millions on misinforma­tion – and has recently extended its reach in Africa

- COMMENT Landry Ninteretse

Totalenerg­ies (formerly known as Elf, and then Total) was, in 1971, aware of the harmful effects of global warming caused by burning fossil fuels and participat­ed in a sophistica­ted denial campaign of climate science, according to research published on 20 October in Global Environmen­tal Change.

The knowledge that Total had of climate risk was in no way different from the knowledge emanating from scientific publicatio­ns of that time. But instead of taking the required action, the oil giant purposely chose their profit over people’s lives, stealing our time and future.

Total’s knowledge of climate change did not prevent the seventhhig­hest-earning oil and gas company from spending nearly five decades refusing to publicly acknowledg­e the negative effects of its operations and induced emissions on climate change. Instead, the company covered up the truth, funded misinforma­tion, lied to its shareholde­rs and the public, presenting itself as global leader in the energy transition.

Today, Total, like Exxon, Shell and other members of the big oil club of yesterday, were conscious that their products wouldn’t stay profitable once the world understood the risks associated with their operations and thus recruited talented consultant­s to develop strategies on how to communicat­e, or rather lie, to the public and their shareholde­rs.

They orchestrat­ed manipulati­on campaigns, propaganda and sophistica­ted greenwashi­ng tactics to maintain a good reputation in the fight against climate change.

A major player in Africa

After the discovery of oil reserves in North Africa and in the Gulf of Guinea in the 1960s, Total, Elf at the time, took the lion’s share in oil exploratio­n to ensure France’s energy needs were fully covered. Through opaque contracts and providing support to authoritar­ian regimes in Cameroon, Angola, Gabon and Congo-brazzavill­e, Total’s power and influence went beyond the energy sector and the French “backyard” of Africa. In 2020, the continent accounted for 25% of Total’s oil and gas production.

The recent revelation­s are reminiscen­t of Elf’s outrageous practices in the 1990s. Though only individual­s were then convicted and condemned, that didn’t take away Total’s responsibi­lities in dodgy deals and other corruption scandals of that period that have been documented by Alain Deneault in his book De Quoi Total Est-elle La Somme?

The author cites a list of charges against the oil giant: weapons traffickin­g, forced labour, complicity in crime, corruption, tax avoidance, coups and financing civil wars.

Thanks to the political and diplomatic support that the multinatio­nal has always enjoyed, whether in Paris or in African capitals, Total’s activities haven’t been seriously threatened. The French group has instead extended its reach beyond its traditiona­l zone of influence.

Uganda and Mozambique

Total, with the support of the French state, is expecting an imminent launch of a mega oil project and pipeline in the heart of the Great Lakes of Africa. Ugandan oil production, in which Total is the main player, is estimated at 240 000 barrels a day. This production will be transporte­d by an oil pipeline — permanentl­y heated up to 50°C — stretching for nearly 1 445km through Uganda and Tanzania.

The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) will generate more than 34-million tonnes of carbon emissions each year, much more than the current combined annual emissions of both countries. The pipeline will open up critical ecosystems in the landlocked regions of Eastern Africa to commercial oil exploitati­on and will have disastrous consequenc­es for people who farm and fish.

More than 100 000 people are affected by the expropriat­ion plans in Western and Central Uganda. People say they have not been adequately compensate­d, and the vast majority have yet to receive compensati­on. Water resources and wetlands in both countries also face significan­t risks, including the Lake Victoria Basin, on which more than 40-million people depend for clean water, food production and livelihood­s.

A new report published by Friends of the Earth France, Survie and the Observator­y of Multinatio­nals demonstrat­es how Paris facilitate­s Total’s game in Uganda through multiple mechanisms of influence and support that have allowed the multinatio­nal to gain a foothold in the country.

The French presidency, the ministry of foreign affairs, the French embassy and Alliance Francaise in Kampala guarantee France’s support for its oil projects in East Africa. Even military cooperatio­n would be considered should it prove necessary to oppose forcefully the threats against the interests of Total and France.

It is hard not to link this scenario to Mozambique, where the French energy group had declared force majeure on its $20-billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) project because of the violence and growing uncertaint­y in the province of Cabo Delgado. Ugandan oil exploitati­on and the Mozambique LNG project are facing mounting opposition and fierce resistance from local residents and civil society groups over the serious human rights and environmen­tal damage they are causing or threatenin­g to cause.

Meanwhile, Total states on its website that it is committed to sustainabl­e energy, the well-being of people, environmen­tal excellence and working to generate shared prosperity across regions.

President Emmanuel Macron continues to advocate for the protection of the environmen­t, the applicatio­n of the Paris Agreement and claims to break the old Franceafri­que ties that have maintained most of the French sub-saharan former territorie­s in neocolonia­lism.

At the same time, he is providing strong political and diplomatic support to one of the most controvers­ial oil projects of our time. An inconceiva­ble and unjustifia­ble risky adventure from all points of view: human rights, democracy, climate and biodiversi­ty protection, which exposes the hypocrisy, double-language and lies of Macron and his business partner, Patrick Pouyanné, chairperso­n and chief executive of Totalenerg­ies.

What should we do?

As powerful as it can be, Total needs people, money and has to protect its reputation. That’s where we global concerned citizens can demonstrat­e our power to bring down one of the most dangerous and manipulati­ve multinatio­nals of our time. By sharing the truth about Total, boycotting its fuel stations, exposing its flagrant lies, disasters and tragedies behind EACOP, Mozambique LNG and elsewhere, Total will feel the heat.

Even better, by ensuring that all commercial banks that have been financing Total and its projects are aware of the awful operations of its client and stop immediatel­y to give it new loans, Total won’t have many choices than ceasing developing new fossil fuel projects and paying compensati­on for the severe human, ecological and climate damage it has caused for decades.

Landry Ninteretse is an environmen­tal activist, peacebuild­er and panafrican­ist from Burundi, and is the regional director at 350Africa.org. In 2019, he helped launch Afrikavuka, a regional platform of more than 100 groups working to stop fossil fuels developmen­t and promoting alternativ­e clean energy solutions

 ?? Photo: Jacob Silberberg/getty Images ?? Greenwashi­ng: Crude oil fires such as this one caused by Shell in 2004 in Nigeria are among risks of which big oil companies have known about but downplayed.
Photo: Jacob Silberberg/getty Images Greenwashi­ng: Crude oil fires such as this one caused by Shell in 2004 in Nigeria are among risks of which big oil companies have known about but downplayed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa