Mail & Guardian

Part 1: Introducti­on

-

Foreword:

The contents of this article cover the findings from an Inter-school Forum held on 15 and 16 June focusing on youth wellbeing. Various schools throughout Johannesbu­rg, both public and private, were brought together to discuss youth wellbeing. In the spirit of Youth Day, it also addressed wellbeing in the context of South Africa’s education system.

St John’s College student organisers Lethokuhle Sikosana and Mlibo Mlonzi explained: “We wanted to formulate tangible and practical solutions that would promote emotional, physical and mental wellbeing in each of our schools. We also felt that there was a lack of student dialogue between schools and that, by bringing students from various background­s together, we could create the foundation for future student-led dialogue. This is by no means a complete roadmap to solving each of the issues identified but simply our reflection­s on the forum, and a departure point for our ideas on how to cultivate wellbeing.

“Typically wellbeing is only looked at either from an individual or community/collective scale, but we chose to integrate the many aspects of wellbeing in this forum. We also felt it was important to publicly broadcast these findings in order to increase the impact beyond the forum.”

Summary

The forum allowed students to explore the inequality in education that many students face in South Africa. The inequality starts with unequal access to basic safe amenities and resources, and this has had a direct and major impact on the quality of education at all stages of learning.

Additional­ly factors such as the impact of discrimina­tion, strain from challengin­g household circumstan­ces and lack of mental health support were explored. Some of the discussed impacts were low self-confidence, compromise­d learning and feelings of “otherness”. The students examined how all of the above affects their personal, relational and communal spaces of wellbeing and discussed how they relate to these spaces from their own departure points and environmen­ts. It was concluded that, to increase the performanc­e of students in schools, general wellness needs to become a primary focus and safe spaces need to be created to ensure adequate support for all students.

Unpacking inequality

The highlighti­ng and prevention of issues arising in schools because of inequality was examined. The discussion centered around how to prevent issues such as racism, religious discrimina­tion and economic inequality from manifestin­g in schools. The question of how we empower individual­s to be aware of and advocate for their health and wellbeing was raised and solutions were discussed. These involved identifyin­g and recognisin­g the problems and then implementi­ng strategies in order to reduce the occurrence of these issues.

Questions such as “Why should POC students (specifical­ly black students) move to previously and predominan­tly still white areas or schools to receive a quality education?” and “Why are there previously only black, and still predominan­tly black schools, in disadvanta­ged areas?” were raised. Despite the rhetoric of the desegregat­ion of schools, many schools still remain segregated and unequal and continue to cater to the designated racial groups they had previously served during apartheid. Discussing an issue like inequality is extremely important, as it severely affects the wellbeing of the youth.

What are the different components of wellbeing

Before the forum could work on/address wellbeing in schools, the students needed to understand where these inequaliti­es are experience­d. Prillelten­sky’s (2005) model of the four Ss of wellbeing, presented in his article Promoting wellbeing: Time for a paradigm shift in health and human services, was used as a method of identifyin­g wellbeing or the lack thereof. The Ss are all divided into the categories of:

Sites: Where is wellbeing located?

Signs: What are the signs of whether wellbeing is being experience­d, or if it is not;

Sources: What are the sources of wellbeing? Strategies: How do you, step-by-step, create a strategy/plan to create solutions to the previous Ss identified?

The three sites of wellbeing exist on the following

levels: personal, relational and communal. Each of these levels deal with an element of how students experience wellbeing, or a lack of it.

Personal level, which deals with:

• financial stability • spiritual wellbeing • mental health • emotional wellbeing.

Relational level, which deals with:

• family • friends • peers • partners.

Community level, which deals with:

• housing • education • healthcare.

Understand­ing and identifyin­g the specific examples help in formulatin­g strategies to approach the question better. These three sites help contextual­ise where wellbeing (or the lack thereof) is being experience­d.

The exploratio­n of the sites of wellbeing and their different components help contribute to the planning of strategies of a school centred around the wellbeing of its students.

Part 2: Different components of wellbeing and what we identified

Personal:

1. Signs

• Psychologi­cal or mental – Confidence/ lack of confidence, being focused, discipline­d.

• Emotional – anxiety attacks, good self-esteem, sadness due to drop in performanc­e, negative self-esteem. • Spiritual – A connection with something outside of oneself and whether that brings fulfilment.

• Physical – Eating habits, hygiene, how one

presents yourself, sleeping patterns.

2 Sources

Stress:

• Does a person have means to relieve stress (sport, friends, therapy, downtime)? If these means are missing or not working, why are they missing, and what can be done to fix this?

Financiall­y:

• Is the financial status of the person

contributi­ng to or detracting from their

wellbeing? For example transport, food/ lunch, school fees, “status”, opportunit­ies and ability to do certain activities with friends and family.

Environmen­t:

• Is the environmen­t in which students are living and working (school/work and home) contributi­ng to wellbeing?

• Are students being recognised for their achievemen­ts and efforts? Are they living in an environmen­t that motivates them to want to achieve certain things?

Socially:

• The need to be “followed and liked” on social platforms can be detrimenta­l to one’s wellbeing. Social media is polarising, shares opposing perception­s and can pressurise someone to conform to certain ideals in order to fulfil a need to be “liked” and fit in. Furthermor­e, the global nature of social media means that one’s actions and presence on social media have universal impacts, which can also have an impact on one’s wellbeing.

• Students have a school life, a social life, a private life and many other spheres of life in which they partake. To manage this and the expectatio­ns in each of these spheres can also have a negative influence on wellbeing.

3. Strategies

There are strategies that we can integrate into our daily lives that can make and impact and have a positive influence. These include things like having a platform for expression, means and safe spaces to relax, a loving support system, celebratio­n and recognitio­n of personal improvemen­ts or achievemen­ts, the ability to selfreflec­t and having some habits or routines that help relieve stress, maintain motivation and allow time for passions. Limiting and regulating social media use is another strategy that can positively impact wellbeing, although this is becoming increasing­ly trickier to do in our technologi­callyrelia­nt society; how does one reduce the constant comparison­s and unrealisti­c expectatio­ns?

Relational

1. Signs

• Relational wellbeing is based on whether or not our social wants and needs are being met. The quality of our relationsh­ips in our day-to-day lives affects how we act, feel and present ourselves to other people.

Signs that relationsh­ips are positively affecting our wellbeing:

• Self-acceptance in a relationsh­ip • Mutual respect

• Solid boundaries

• Transparen­cy and compassion within a

relationsh­ip.

Signs that relationsh­ips are negatively affecting our wellbeing:

• Withdrawal from group activities

• Taking part in dangerous activities such as

crime and drugs

• Isolating oneself from family and friends • Self-consciousn­ess within a relationsh­ip • Change in behaviour (easily irritable,

depressed and anxious).

2. Source

• Family and friends – the pressure, competitio­n or support received from a trusted circle

• Environmen­t – living circumstan­ces, place of work/school and people one surrounds oneself with

• Is a person receiving positive comments from their peers? Is the “ratio” of negative to supportive feedback from their peers a positive ratio?

• Academic environmen­t – the way one

interacts with teachers and peers.

3. Strategies

A key strategy to achieve relational wellbeing is restorativ­e justice between students after an incident. In a mediation setup, students are able to express themselves in a safe, managed and supportive environmen­t in which they are free to learn and grow. Creating environmen­ts in which students can develop relationsh­ips across the grades (such as a buddy system) can resolve issues such as hierarchic­al bullying in schools. Lastly, a strategy to address familial relationsh­ips is family therapy. Having the objective opinion of a third party can be beneficial and liberating for all members of the family.

Community

1. Signs

Community wellbeing is a mixture of all aspects of our daily lives and how they impact our mental health. This includes social, economic, environmen­tal, cultural or even political.

Signs of positive wellbeing in communitie­s: • Positive emotions brought by one’s environmen­t ( social, cultural or even economic)

• A sense of belonging and general comfort

within one’s community.

Signs of negative wellbeing in our communitie­s • Negative emotions – feelings of stress,

anxiety and insecurity

• Unpleasant relationsh­ips

• Basic rights being disregarde­d

• Lack of service delivery.

2. Sources

Sources within the community:

• Media: It surrounds us and is easily accessible. The community we are surrounded by has a large impact on what we are exposed to (such as advertisin­g and propaganda). By questionin­g what content we choose to seek out and what our communitie­s expose us to on social media, we can better manage our wellbeing. • Inequality: The impact of race, gender, ethnicity and economic status on opportunit­ies (such as careers, salaries and promotions). There is this veneer of the “Rainbow Nation”, yet we are still in a fight for equality for all.

• High performanc­e and achievemen­t culture: We live in a society where there is only space to succeed. People feel defined by their marks and achievemen­ts and fear mistakes instead of learning from them. This pressurisi­ng culture affects one relational­ly and personally and often leads to unhealthy competitio­n in which people bring one another down.

• Religion: Within communitie­s, these can have a positive or negative influence. The values that many religions hold can be incredible assets in building a safe and moral environmen­t. However, in a recent workshop, it was interestin­g to hear how religion can also take a toll on those who feel rejected by that community.

• Cancel culture within schools: This refers to a form of ostracism in which an individual is shunned from certain

 ?? ?? Students in discussion about what strategies should be used for wellbeing in schools
Students in discussion about what strategies should be used for wellbeing in schools
 ?? ?? A group photo of the entire delegation, taken on June 16
A group photo of the entire delegation, taken on June 16

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa