Mail & Guardian

‘Slimes dam disaster preventabl­e’

A second tailings storage facility at the Jagersfont­ein diamond mine in the Free State is at risk of collapsing

- Sheree Bega

The collapse of the wall of a slimes dam at the Jagersfont­ein diamond mine in the Free State on 11 September led to a 1.5kmwide wave of grey mud gushing into the area. It inundated homes, killed one person, injured more than 70 people and displaced hundreds.

“This is not a natural disaster,” said Sputnik Ratau, spokespers­on for the water and sanitation department. “That is why, from our point of view, we really are saying to the mine that this is a disaster.”

Another sludge-filled tailings storage facility at the mine is also at risk of failing and interventi­on is needed “yesterday” to prevent an even more serious disaster from unfolding, the department has warned.

“They need to empty that compartmen­t,” Ratau said. “There is a pit that we are saying we can give them authorisat­ion immediatel­y to use to reduce the content of that compartmen­t.

“Their engineers will just have to make sure this thing happens, like, yesterday. That is the starting point and we can then follow up with all the other things that need to happen, including the issue of rehabilita­tion and water quality.”

‘Pawpaw has hit the fan’

The Jagersfont­ein disaster was preventabl­e, said water governance expert Carin Bosman. “Slimes dams, tailings dams, have been used all over the world for more than 100 years. The engineerin­g principle behind slippage and failure is well known … Too much water and the wall will give way.”

She said “kilometres will be written” in the weeks to come about who should have done what to prevent the disaster but that ship had sailed. “The pawpaw has hit the fan. We need to talk about what we can do now to prevent this impact from going further and becoming worse.”

The pollution plume is estimated to have travelled about 8km and is headed towards the Orange River.

“Apart from the immediate humanitari­an disaster, those slimes went down the valley and are in the upper dry reaches of the river. As soon as the rainy season starts, that shit is going to flow further downstream and is part of the Orange catchment. So, if we don’t start immediate blocking efforts into that little stream, and start cleaning from the stream backwards, we will see this pollution in the dam very shortly.”

The area’s sewage works seems to have also been taken out by the spillage, Bosman said, “which means that raw sewage has now mixed with the slimes and is following that path down the river and that poses a significan­t health risk”.

Ratau said the sludge had moved into the Riet River, which supplies water to the Kalkfontei­n Dam, which is in a nature reserve. The department’s officials are conducting water quality tests “for acidity, alkalinity, nitrates and the works” as well as for the main threat — arsenic. “That will inform us of what is exactly in there.”

Directives

In December 2020, the department issued a directive against the mine’s owner, Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts, which extracts diamonds from the waste tailings of mining operations, ordering it to cease operations for disposing volumes above authorised limits. Action plans were requested to rectify identified contravent­ions and the company advised with regard to dam safety requiremen­ts of the department, Ratau said.

The directive notes how, on 29 September 2020, the department said the firm had exceeded the volumes authorised for the disposal on the fine tailings storage facility in contravent­ion of the water use licence conditions, describing how inadequate planning and “blatant non-compliance” has “placed all parties in a precarious situation”.

It cited a report by SRK Consulting in November 2020, in which engineers identified a “serious risk” with the fine tailings disposal facility. The directive, too, noted how, since the department’s notice was issued, “wherein you were notified not to dispose of further volumes of waste … your operations have disposed of further volumes of waste”.

Ownership

Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts said it is “devastated” by the breach at its slimes dam and the effect on the residents. It had made R20-million available immediatel­y for displaced residents, providing food parcels, necessary supplies, and settling medical and hospital bills since the collapse of the dam.

It said the tailings dam remained stable overnight and operations to “pump remaining waste from the treatment facility has commenced as restoratio­n efforts continue at the site. Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts’ priority remains the safety and health of the community and returning them to their homes and livelihood­s. Water has been largely restored to the town, a major step towards readying the company for clean-up operations.

“Although mining operations in the town have been dormant for many years and were not undertaken by Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts, the treatment facility, which it does own, has been a viable and functionin­g plant. As such, it has been subjected to regular maintenanc­e, compliance checks, and has been processing the dormant diamond mine waste legally.”

It said it employs 70% of its workforce from the surroundin­g community. “As such, it is committed to restoring operations and the town to continue providing incomes for these families.” While it is too early to establish any reason for the collapse, the company has appointed an independen­t investigat­ion team “to understand the facts”.

Jagersfont­ein is home to the oldest and largest diamond mine hole in the world, and remained in service until the early 1970s when the owner, De Beers, shut it down.

Twelve years ago, De Beers sold the mine’s tailings dumps to the Superkolon­g Consortium, which included Reinet Investment­s, a Luxembourg-based business run by luxury tycoon and Richemont chairperso­n Johann Rupert. He is reported to have sold the assets a few months before the incident.

In April this year, Reinet concluded a transactio­n to sell its interest in Jagersfont­ein to Dubai’s Stargems Group, a diamond-sourcing and supply company, which has stated the tailings storage facility was “safe and secure”.

‘Hold De Beers accountabl­e’

The nonprofit groundwork said De Beers and its subsidiari­es must be held accountabl­e and pay for the clean-up and rehabilita­tion, maintenanc­e and closure of the mine, and develop a just transition plan for the residents of Jagersfont­ein. “This must start with immediate compensati­on for damages from the spill and the lives lost.”

The Jagersfont­ein mine was one of the largest De Beers mines during the colonial and apartheid times. “In 2010, De Beers offloaded the legacy of their wealth creation — the toxic waste of past mining — onto the local community through the Superkolon­g Consortium,” said groundwork.

“De Beers claimed that the deal … met the criteria set by De Beers including technical, economic, community, technical competence, available funding to develop the new processing operation … We need to understand what due diligence was done by De Beers and the government to allow this deal to go through.

“If it is found that the company operating the mine has contravene­d its water use licence, groundwork calls for the present directors and owners to be held responsibl­e for the disaster and, more importantl­y, for De Beers … to take responsibi­lity for their historical operations.”

De Beers Group spokespers­on Jackie Mapiloko did not respond to groundwork’s statement but referred the Mail & Guardian to the statement it issued on Monday, which noted how the company ceased operations at Jagersfont­ein in 1971 and, despite having sold the operation along with its associated liabilitie­s in 2010, “we stand ready to provide technical assistance and support to the government should it be requested by the Minerals Council South Africa”.

Pass the parcel

Mariette Liefferink, the chief executive of the Federation for a Sustainabl­e Environmen­t, said this was typical of “pass the parcel”; mines are sold close to closure to poorer-resourced companies, which relieves them of the responsibi­lity and liability of dealing with the problems of closure.

She said the department­s of water and sanitation and of mineral resources and energy ought to have enforced non-compliance­s. “It would appear that directives were issued for non-compliance­s but these must be enforced. You cannot wait for a disaster before you enforce directives.”

Although Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts said it had confirmati­on “that the wastewater is not hazardous”, Liefferink disputed this.

“If that claim is made, the public would like to see their water quality results … It is necessary for them to give evidence that that water is not hazardous to health, well-being and the environmen­t. The reason it is stored in a dam is obviously because there are certain risks and hazards inherent to mining waste ... We don’t know what the long-term impact is on human health and the environmen­t.”

She has just completed the curriculum to train mining communitie­s about the risks and hazards of tailings storage facilities and to prepare them for catastroph­ic events.

“This is part of what the investor community has called upon after the Brumadinho mine dam failure [in Brazil]. In South Africa, our tailings storage facilities are all upstream, which means that it is the lower cost but the higher risk. That is why constant vigilance, monitoring and management must be ensured. And the fact that our communitie­s live so close to these mine dams or tailings storage facilities is also a significan­t risk.”

Impending disaster

Palesa Chubisi, spokespers­on for Free State Premier Sisi Ntombela, said the person confirmed dead was a 70-year-old man while a 50-yearold woman remains unaccounte­d for. A pregnant woman, who sustained a fracture, is the only person who remains in hospital and is responding well to treatment.

Karabo Khakhau, the Democratic Alliance member of the Free State legislatur­e, said residents had flagged concerns about the mine, including their proximity to the dumps, for years. “If the Free State provincial government had a disaster management centre as mandated by the law, it would have been able to assess the risk and have precaution­ary measures in place to ensure that residents are protected …

“The disaster here in Jagersfont­ein is not a mere disaster that happened overnight. It is a question of negligence on the part of local authoritie­s here and the provincial government because all the community members’ cries fell on deaf ears.”

 ?? Photo: Ntswe Mokoena ?? Disaster: A 1.5km-wide wave of mud washed through Jagersfont­ein and travelled 8km, polluting everything in its path, as well as destroying homes and killing livestock.
Photo: Ntswe Mokoena Disaster: A 1.5km-wide wave of mud washed through Jagersfont­ein and travelled 8km, polluting everything in its path, as well as destroying homes and killing livestock.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa