Mail & Guardian

Clear vision led SA’S industrial revolution

Lessons from when Jan Smuts drove the industrial­isation of South Africa in the form of electricit­y and steel to benefit an elite community

- Mzukisi Qobo is head of the Wits School of Governance at the University of the Witwatersr­and. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessaril­y reflect the official policy or position of the Mail & Guardian.

The troubles besetting Eskom raise questions about South Africa’s industrial future. A stable energy supply is an essential fuel for growth and prosperity. The prospects for expanding manufactur­ing are dim under the current climate of power cuts. Yet, without growth in the productive sectors of the economy, there can be no new jobs created sustainabl­y.

This year marks 100 years since the promulgati­on of the Electricit­y Act that came into force on 1 September 1922 to establish Eskom for the purpose of stimulatin­g industrial­isation and improving the welfare of the Afrikaner community.

Before Eskom, mining companies had their own generation capacity, and power generation, in general, was decentrali­sed at the local level, used mainly by coal and gold miners and for municipal services and tramways.

Jan Smuts had dreamt of South Africa as an industrial powerhouse that was not just known for its minerals. He was fixated on the idea of reducing dependence on the Englishdom­inated mining sector. In the immediate, he was troubled by the “poor white problem” and sought to find a permanent solution that would confine this problem to the ash heap of history.

In envisionin­g Eskom, his goal was to promote integrated industrial­isation through cheap electricit­y, create full employment among Afrikaners, and ignite entreprene­urial activity among this community to ensure they permanentl­y escaped the clutches of poverty.

It is inconceiva­ble that South Africa would have built any industrial capacity of note without cheap electricit­y.

The skill to create a complex energy utility was outside the country. Smuts turned to Hendrik Johannes van der Bijl to shoulder the task of creating the new utility and overcoming the fragmented generation of electricit­y, to the anxiety of municipali­ties, which would lose their revenue.

Van der Bijl studied in Germany, where he obtained his PHD. At the time Smuts called him, Van der Bijl was plying his trade in America. He accepted the call to return to South Africa and aid its industrial developmen­t.

It is worth noting that this industrial civilisati­on had its dark underbelly — it excluded the majority of Africans from electricit­y. The patterns of electricit­y consumptio­n were skewed in favour of a tiny white community, and the gains of industrial production were distribute­d in favour of white-owned businesses.

In his book, Electricit­y, Industry and Class in South Africa, Renfrew Christie reflected on the inequities of that period: “Power reaches almost every corner of South Africa except the homes of most of the black workers and peasants”.

Yet the creation of the power utility was revolution­ary for its beneficiar­ies at that point in history. So successful was Van der Bijl in powering households and industries that the government asked him to start another state-owned company — a steel manufactur­er.

According to Alice Jacobs, his biographer, Van der Bijl persuaded the government to introduce a Bounties Act, which would effectivel­y inject subsidies into state-owned steel production. In 1923 the Bounties Act was promulgate­d and paved the way for large-scale steel production. The ultimate goal of the government subsidy was to accelerate the developmen­t of local content.

Today there is strong pushback against local content and a belief that South Africa can build new industrial capacity, including in new green industries, by becoming reliant on imports instead of developing a sound plan for local capacity. No doubt, it takes a while to build industrial capacities, but there has to be a burning intent to produce this with a clear, time-bound plan.

Five years after Eskom was formed, a new bill establishi­ng state-owned Iscor was promulgate­d and by 1928 Iscor was in business. Iscor stimulated many other steelworks in the country, especially components and intermedia­te products. These included bolts and nuts, pipes, chains, agricultur­al implements, ferro-alloys and plenty of others.

At the time of the establishm­ent of Iscor, the private sector was sceptical and hesitant to contribute to this endeavour. Business leaders held the view that South Africa would not succeed as a steel producer, that its climatic conditions were unfavourab­le, the country was uncompetit­ive, and it would not be able to weather the deluge of dumped steel, especially from Britain and Belgium.

Dumping did occur, but this galvanised the state to impose tariff measures to protect steel production in South Africa.

Thus import substituti­on industrial­isation became the centrepiec­e of industrial developmen­t protecting infant industries from steel to chemicals, clothing and textiles, and, later, the automotive sector.

It is worth noting that Iscor came to life during inauspicio­us times — the world was going through depression and the poor-white problem in South Africa was intensifyi­ng with worrying signs of more political upheavals, especially against the backdrop of the 1922 labour strike that the Smuts government had quelled violently, and which cost him politicall­y in the elections two years later.

The macro-economic conditions were inclement with high interest rates threatenin­g to put brakes on capital formation. Yet there was no stopping the Afrikaner elite from pursuing its mission.

So determined was the government to build industrial capacity in South Africa, it reached out to the German government to send technical expertise to South Africa.

The idea was that foreign experts would train South African workers so that the country would not be perpetuall­y dependent on foreign skills and technologi­es.

By the time World War II broke out in 1939, South Africa was in an advantageo­us position to be a pivotal actor in supplying goods to the battlefron­t. Van der Bijl assumed the powerful role as director general to coordinate supplies through a new state-owned enterprise, War Supplies, which, at the end of the conflict, helped to drive production for civilian use, producing items from electronic goods to clothing and textiles.

This state institutio­n also paved the way for medical science as the country expanded into the production of vaccines.

Less than a decade after the end of the war, Van der Bijl was again asked by the government to create an industrial financing instrument to support the entreprene­urial activities of Afrikaners so that they would not be wholly dependent on the state. In 1940 the Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n was formed, and it became instrument­al in creating various industry initiative­s, including Sasol.

Some of the important lessons in this industrial trajectory included a commitment to a clearly defined vision. This was to create rival capital to the English businessme­n who were hogging the mining sector, eliminate poverty among whites, restore their dignity and create a new class of entreprene­urs.

The Afrikaner political elite imposed heavy taxes on the English mining industry to support an Afrikaner-led developmen­t path.

Ideas and human capital played a vital role in this project. Afrikaner nationalis­m was hitched to a longterm industrial vision rather than as an idea for its own sake. Ethnic consciousn­ess was mobilised to realise a grand industrial vision.

While history cannot be reconstruc­ted, especially given its highly racialised nature, the state has a major role to play in forging economic inclusion and nurturing conditions for wealth creation among black industrial­ists and small and medium enterprise­s that are supported to integrate meaningful­ly into mainstream economic activities.

For the state to succeed, those who run it must be motivated by a clear vision to overcome economic deprivatio­ns facing the black community and to build a thriving society, rather than be fixated on extracting rents for their personal benefit.

They must also take seriously the importance of building bureaucrat­ic efficienci­es in the state by sourcing and deploying skills that are not defined by narrow party political affiliatio­ns.

Foreign experts would train SA workers so the country would not be perpetuall­y dependent on foreign skills and technologi­es

 ?? ??
 ?? Photo (above) : Dori Moreno ?? Powerful plan: Saldanha Steel was originally formed as a partnershi­p between Iscor and the Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n and was arranged by Jan Smuts, below.
Photo (above) : Dori Moreno Powerful plan: Saldanha Steel was originally formed as a partnershi­p between Iscor and the Industrial Developmen­t Corporatio­n and was arranged by Jan Smuts, below.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa