Mail & Guardian

Clumsily correcting healthcare inequity

The department has tried to turn the health system around but it’s plagued by inefficien­cy, staff shortages, dismal leadership and governance failures

- Chris Bateman

The ANC’S bid to dismantle racially oriented and disparate access to healthcare continues, with the government having doubled spending on and usage of primary healthcare and having hugely boosted immunisati­on.

However, it has largely failed to lead, govern and manage, both in the rendering of services in the state sector and in giving oversight to the private sector. That’s the consensus of several academic analyses of the past 20 to 30 years of healthcare policy and its often clumsy translatio­n into delivery — and from interviews with top academics, clinicians and researcher­s.

Battling a triple burden of disease plus trauma and homicide, and one of the world’s worst Gini coefficien­ts, the government has gone from the ignominy and lethal cost of Aids denialism to global admiration at the largest-ever roll-out of antiretrov­iral treatment (ART).

Yet South Africa still has nearly nine million people living with HIV, with more than five million on treatment, and carries just under 17% of the global HIV burden. This incurable disease has been largely reduced to chronic, non-infectious status, (depending on drug adherence), but aggravates and drives many other pre- and post- antiretrov­iral co-morbiditie­s, not least tuberculos­is.

TB remains the country’s biggest killer after diabetes, but has seen significan­t progress in detection, treatment and drug adherence, with longacting oral drugs now available and even longer-acting injectable drugs imminent.

South Africa’s world-class researcher­s, academics and clinicians in both the public and private sectors, plus the indomitabl­e NGOS, are disproport­ionately responsibl­e for healthcare delivery and advances in TB and HIV treatment.

But the ANC’S tenure is not without merit.

Anti-tobacco legislatio­n, introduced during the ANC’S debut ministeria­l tenure of Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma is among the most advanced in the world. Legislativ­e bids to reduce the salt content in foods and add a 20% tax surcharge on high sugar content beverages led by then health minister Aaron Motsaoledi, while helpful, fell short of desired targets to have a significan­t effect on health outcomes — and enforcemen­t remains a problem.

The sugar tax surcharge ended up at 10% and the stated intention to put the money into a Health Promotion Fund remains an empty promise.

The 2003 National Health Act, passed during Manto Tshabalams­imang’s tumultuous Aids denialism era, formalised the district health system, the vehicle for primary healthcare service delivery.

Free primary healthcare services and an ambitious clinic-building programme saw a growth in visits to these facilities from 67 million in 1998 to 129 million by the end of March 2013, and the near doubling of primary healthcare expenditur­e per capita.

Other encouragin­g developmen­ts included the expanded immunisati­on programme, with the country declared poliofree in 2019 and narrowly missing the 2023 malariafre­e target date. Primary healthcare is pivotal to the hotly debated National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme, which represents the ultimate realisatio­n of the ANC’S bid to create equal access to quality healthcare, which some argue is a constituti­onal imperative.

Yet the war over a single payer (government) versus a dual payer/ provider system, underpinne­d by the now legislativ­ely threatened medical aid industry — which claims that section 33 of the NHI Bill will ultimately degrade healthcare — is set for a decisive battle in the constituti­onal court.

The private healthcare sector and business wants private funders to continue providing services, giving patients a choice. They say that, unamended, the NHI Bill will cripple healthcare delivery — as unequal and in dire need of reform as it is.

The National Council of Provinces passed the bill without amendment on 6 December.

President Cyril Ramaphosa was expected to sign it into law by middecembe­r. Business Unity SA, incorporat­ing all healthcare profession­al groupings, describe it as “unworkable, unimplemen­table, and unaffordab­le, but also unconstitu­tional, both on substantiv­e and procedural grounds”.

They petitioned Ramaphosa to return the bill to parliament.

Meanwhile, the Council for Medical Schemes, (CMS), has stubbornly resisted its member efforts to introduce low cost and more affordable medical aids. Peter Attard Montalto, the managing director at Intellidex, estimates that a fully implemente­d NHI will cost between R300 billion

Eand R460 billion a year.

Another unpalatabl­e decision was the government’s ordering of a country-wide lockdown in 2020 after Covid-19 hit our shores. The lockdown slashed drug adherence, virtually halted healthcare delivery and delayed recovery among those already sick from non-covid affliction­s.

Laetitia Rispel, the South African Research Chair on the Healthcare Workforce at the University of the Witwatersr­and and a public health expert, singles out three major fault lines in her analysis of the country’s health sector transforma­tion from 1994 to today: tolerance of ineptitude, poor leadership as well as management and governance failure.

Opportunis­tic and endemic corruption that, among other things, led to the resignatio­n of then health minister Zweli Mkhize, and the intrinsic conflict in the tripartite alliance during healthcare labour disputes further disrupts healthcare delivery.

Health MECS, especially in the Eastern Cape, often side with striking unions, putting efficient, long-serving healthcare managers on ice at full salary, especially near election dates.

“Nobody wants to take over the hospital chief executive or clinical manager’s job because it automatica­lly puts a union target on your back,” says Siva Pillay, a former director general of health for the Eastern Cape, who took on what is cynically labelled the “Bisho Mafia” and is back in private practice.

Rispel says the lack of a fully functional district health system and an inability or failure to deal decisively with the health workforce crisis are major impediment­s. “These fault lines have negative consequenc­es for patients, health profession­als and policy implementa­tion. Patients, who are relatively powerless, bear the brunt through negative experience­s and sub-optimal care. Healthcare providers on the front line and at the bottom of the hierarchy also suffer. Faced with an unsupporti­ve management environmen­t, staff shortages and health system deficienci­es, they find it difficult to uphold their profession­al code of ethics and provide quality care,” she says.

The promising 2013 setting up of the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) flattered to deceive with regulation delayed and

1999 – 2008

then watered down.

Its retired inaugural director, Dr Carol Marshal, says its aspiration­s were not properly costed nor were the prerequisi­tes for meeting them taken seriously, making many unattainab­le.

“More importantl­y the consequenc­es for non-compliance were never defined so we had no means to ‘assure’ anything except issuing a report. With the incipient NHI, the possibilit­y of the OHSC stipulatin­g requiremen­ts was off the table — they had their own processes and agendas. It was romantic to think it could be different, given the system as whole,” she reflects.

Rispel observes, “If you can use such outfits as the proverbial stick, you make sure it doesn’t affect you in major ways. These are important lessons for the NHI. The way the NHI legislatio­n is written, the minister also has the power to appoint the CEO and board. We simply haven’t learnt.”

Covid exposed enormous workforce problems with earlycaree­r healthcare profession­als most affected by limited early vaccinatio­n, rampant infection and workplace moral injury. Many went to the private sector or overseas because this came on top of an enduring lack of placement, support, guidance, career opportunit­y and developmen­t, the experts stress.

Rispel cites the World Bank on the huge economic cost of underinves­tment in human capital, not to mention preventabl­e Covid infections in the healthcare workforce. Budgets have been slashed back, with swathes of posts frozen.

According to Phil Matley, chairperso­n of the

South African Private Practition­ers Forum, “they accuse us of selfishly working in the privileged private sector and shunning the overburden­ed public sector — but there are no state posts”. Other healthcare systems experts said the central conundrum was a declining economy, a growing population and fewer resources to provide equal or more services.

The current government overall deficit on balance of payments is R161 billion (or 2.4% of GDP, second quarter 2023). Healthcare spending as a proportion of GDP stands at almost 9%, yet healthcare outcomes are worse than many comparable countries that spend less. Rispel’s “magic wand” would be to boost health department stewardshi­p, appoint experts and technocrat­s to crunch the numbers, vastly improve databased decision-making and force the national leadership to “take responsibi­lity instead of blaming the provinces”.

Recently retired health ombud Malegapuru William Makgoba puts abysmal public healthcare delivery in all but the Western Cape, Limpopo and KZN (“where they have at least found a little direction”) down to dismal provincial and hospital leadership, infrastruc­tural decay, and an almost universal shortage of human resource capacity.

“Because of understaff­ing at every level, you have little institutio­nal knowledge about the discipline­s being practised in those hospitals. Everything has suffered and everyone is overworked and overstretc­hed,” Makgoba adds.

He says Gauteng’s health department is today as dysfunctio­nal as it was when 1 500 Esidimeni Life patients were decanted to cheap, mainly unlicensed, and grossly underresou­rced care centres as a cost-cutting measure in the first half of 2016, resulting in 144 deaths, many of them from starvation and neglect.

Rispel says it’s ironic that the biggest growth in the private healthcare sector occurred after 1994, to the detriment of the public sector, with the 2019 Health Market Inquiry’s scathing findings of perverse incentives and other dubious practices a decade too late.

“Now we’re in the unenviable position of trying to turn the tanker around in rough seas.”

Aaron Motsoaledi

Manto Tshabalala-msimang

2009 – 2019

2019 – 2021

Mmamaloku Kubayi (acting) 9/6/2021 – 5/8/2021

2021 – present

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? Photo: Waldo Swiegers/getty Images ?? Flatline: Public healthcare fails in most provinces because of poor leadership in hospitals and at provincial government, decaying infrastruc­ture and overworked staff.
Photo: Waldo Swiegers/getty Images Flatline: Public healthcare fails in most provinces because of poor leadership in hospitals and at provincial government, decaying infrastruc­ture and overworked staff.
 ?? ?? Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma 1994 – 1999
Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma 1994 – 1999
 ?? ?? Barbara Hogan 2008 – 2009
Barbara Hogan 2008 – 2009
 ?? ?? Zweli Mkhize
Zweli Mkhize
 ?? ?? Joe Phaahla
Joe Phaahla

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa