Post

Durban businessma­n in R235 million SARS tax probe

- LOGAN GOVENDER

THE payment of a staggering R235 million to a Durban businessma­n in VAT returns by SARS has raised eyebrows and prompted a judge to call for a high-level probe.

In an exclusive, POST has establishe­d that the businessma­n and a bookkeeper are being prosecuted in connection with the matter.

But questions have been asked about why others who might have had a hand in the alleged scam, possibly SARS employees, have not yet been identified.

According to papers filed in the Durban Magistrate’s Court, Judge Essa Moosa of the complaints division of the Directorat­e for Priority Crime Investigat­ions (DPCI) has requested a thorough probe into the alleged scam.

Vikash Mohan, a bookkeeper who runs VM Business Services, and Saravan Devaraj Govender, owner of Kairos Holdings (Pty) Ltd, are facing tax fraud charges in that court.

POST can also reveal that the criminal case against Govender has been postponed to an unconfirme­d date because he has launched an applicatio­n in the Durban High Court challengin­g the constituti­onal validity of his prosecutio­n.

Mohan, represente­d by attorney Azgar Ally Khan, is also an accused in two unrelated tax fraud matters in the Durban Magistrate’s Court. He is due back in court next month.

His co-accused in the other two cases are Mohamed Majam and Raventhran Naidoo.

The State claims SARS was defrauded of R7.6m in the matter involving Majam and of R6.4m in the case involving Naidoo.

Regarding the R235m which was allegedly deposited into Govender’s Standard Bank account, the State claims that SARS was defrauded between October 2011 and April 2012.

It alleges that four separate payments, including one for R210.9m, had been made after invoices were submitted for consulting services regarding bottling water, content testing and analysis.

The State claims this was a ruse to defraud SARS.

Selective

Judge Moosa’s interventi­on came about after Mohan complained to his office that he was apparently unfairly targeted by the Hawks and that while a syndicate was behind the alleged tax scams, the syndicate members were not arrested.

The judge has said that the allegation­s made by Mohan, including that the Hawks investigat­ions were ‘selective’, were viewed as very serious.

“The burden of proof is on the complainan­t (Mohan) to provide the necessary evidence of the serious and unlawful infringeme­nt of his rights arising from an investigat­ion done by a member of the DPCI.

Judge Moosa said he had directed Mohan’s complaint to the national head of the DPCI but that the matter was referred to SARS for investigat­ion in terms of the protocol which existed between the two entities.

“After SARS completes its investigat­ions the matter will be referred back to the DPCI to take further steps, if necessary.

“The DPCI has requested that the complainan­t (Mohan) approach the prosecutin­g authority to postpone the case pending the outcome of the investigat­ions,” he said.

“A copy of the report of the findings will be sent to the minister of finance for his informatio­n, action and record. Mohan will also be informed of the findings.”

Helen Templeton, a specialist in the SARS litigation unit, said in an opposing affidavit in the Durban High Court (concerning the constituti­onal challenge applicatio­n) that the tax authority had been alerted in May 2012 that R210 952 386.96 had been deposited into Govender’s bank account.

“After Standard Bank sought authorisat­ion from SARS, SARS’ criminal investigat­ive unit in Durban conducted investigat­ions.

“There appeared to be additional fraudulent refunds and collective­ly SARS was prejudiced of R235 009 664.62,” she said.

Govender’s applicatio­n is being opposed by SARS, the minister of finance and the Directorat­e of Public Prosecutio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa