Post

Surgeon challenged over ‘coolie’ mentality slur

Sexual innuendos, blasphemy claims also probed

- JOLENE MARRIAH-MAHARAJ

ADURBAN surgeon has been hauled before the Health Profession­s Council of South Africa (HPCSA) after he allegedly said Indians had a “coolie” mentality and had not evolved from the cane-fields.

Professor Anunathan Reddi is also accused of using the k-word, speaking with sexual innuendos, blasphemy and telling a colleague he had bad body odour.

Reddi, who headed the cardio-thoracic surgery department at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, allegedly said the only developmen­t among his Indian colleagues was that their sickles had been replaced by stethoscop­es.

The start of Reddi’s inquiry comes in the month that celebrates the 158th anniversar­y of the arrival of Indians to South Africa.

He appeared before HPCSA chairperso­n Smangaliso Ngubane, last week. He pleaded not guilty.

Reddi has been charged with unprofessi­onal conduct towards his colleagues and making derogatory comments about staff at the hospital between 2011 and 2012.

The complaint against him was lodged by five specialist cardio-thoracic surgeons – Direndra Rajaruthna­m, Kaven Naicker, Gerard Roderick Alexander, Surendra Naidoo and Julian Buckles in 2012.

The surgeons stated in their affidavits that Reddi often used the k-word to describe black Africans, which included a professor.

They said Reddi had commented that all black people would require 500 years to evolve and were not ready to take up senior positions before this period.

He was also accused of using his position of strength to get rid of individual­s.

“This worrying trend created uncertaint­y regarding our tenure as employees,” the affidavit stated.

The surgeons said, during a management meeting with gastroente­rologists and general surgeons to discuss an endoscopic ultrasound on a patient, Reddi allegedly told them “they should pass the scope up their wives’ introitus”.

They alleged he had called another colleague a “moffie” and a “useless doctor”, and continued that he needed to return to high school and start all over again.

Reddi allegedly described the surgeons as zoo animals and rats and that he was the zoo-keeper.

He allegedly told another surgeon that he stank and wondered how his wife tolerated him.

The surgeons said in their affidavits that Reddi ran the department with complete disregard for the policies, procedures or code of conduct of the Department of Health and the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

They said the work environmen­t had become “hostile and intolerabl­e”.

They claimed Reddy believed he was untouchabl­e and that he hid behind the pretext he was a patient advocate.

This was his trump card, the surgeons said.

The surgeons said it was not uncommon to hear Reddi’s alleged blasphemy by swearing Jesus Christ and God.

They believe this was indicative of his inability to respect and value diversity of culture, belief and opinion in the workplace.

They alleged the same sadistic statements were also made by him about the Islamic faith.

The surgeons said while they were cognisant that their grievance could result in them being victimised or hamper their careers, they could no longer allow the alleged attack to continue.

In June 2013, UKZN terminated Reddi’s employment.

The terminatio­n letter stated that his behaviour had been disruptive, discourteo­us and disrespect­ful towards his fellow colleagues.

UKZN Professor MW Makgoba said in the terminatio­n letter that Reddi had abused the disciplina­ry hearing processes by not finishing in the allocated time frame.

He said the incomplete hearing had cost almost a R1 million.

During the two-day HPCSA hearing, Reddi’s counsel argued the charges against his client were unclear in that the details in the affidavits did not supply dates and times.

The matter was postponed to next year.

‘Indians have not evolved from the cane-fields. Their only developmen­t is that their sickles have been replaced by stethoscop­es…’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa