Saturday Star

How to manage the d isadvantag­es of trusts

-

EVEN THOUGH trusts are great vehicles to use in estate planning, they have disadvanta­ges. Some of these can be managed, and others need to be accepted. Either way, trusts are certainly not for everybody.

THE LOSS OF LEGAL CONTROL OVER ASSETS

Your assets are transferre­d to the trust and are managed by the trustees for the benefit of the beneficiar­ies. The use of these assets is determined by the trust deed.

You no longer own the assets, but you can exercise some influence over them by being a trustee. You do not have the power to veto decisions, unless if specifical­ly provided for in the trust deed (more on this below).

Remember that, for a trust to be valid, it should be the founder’s intention to have a trust in place, and the founder should transfer legal (although not beneficial) ownership of the trust assets to the trustees.

Any indication that the founder retains control over the assets may result in the trust being labelled an “alter ego” trust, and dire estate duty consequenc­es may result.

At least one trustee should be independen­t. This will demonstrat­e to the SA Revenue Service (Sars) and creditors that the founder has properly divested of his or her assets. Although the trust’s assets are managed by the trustees on behalf of the beneficiar­ies, the comfort that the founder has regarding the management of the assets is that the trustees are legally bound to comply with the terms of the trust deed, and with their fiduciary duties.

The trustees may only distribute assets to the beneficiar­ies as defined in the trust deed, and in the manner prescribed by it. They are also obliged, at all times, to act in the best interests of the beneficiar­ies, which may include the founder. considered. The founder should be able to influence, but not control decisions made by the trustees.

The founder is permitted to veto trust decisions. However, be mindful that all distribute­d trust income will be taxed in the hands of the donor or funder if he or she can veto distributi­ons. A similar provision applies to capital gains distribute­d to beneficiar­ies.

◆ It is acceptable to insert a clause in the trust deed that requires the founder to be present at a meeting in order to constitute a quorum and to be part of a decision.

This will not be problemati­c for estate duty purposes, unless the founder reserves a casting vote for him- or herself, which will enable the founder, shortly before his or her death, to dispose of the trust assets for his or her benefit, or for the benefit of the founder’s estate. This will trigger the provisions of section 3(3)(d) of the Estate Duty Act.

In summary, provided the founder is not seen to control the trust assets, either through his or her behaviour or through empowering provisions in the trust deed, he or she may retain some influence over the trust assets, and not lose complete control over them.

COSTS

Establishi­ng a trust generates additional administra­tion costs and complexity in one’s affairs. It is important to demonstrat­e the active management of the trust as a separate entity from oneself.

The costs of setting up a trust will include legal fees for drawing the trust deed and registerin­g the trust. Ongoing costs will include the costs to maintain a separate bank account for all the trust’s affairs. Annual financial statements must be prepared.

A trust does not require an audit, unless the Master of the

High Court requests it, or should the trust deed stipulate that it must be audited.

Sars views a trust as a separate legal entity for which income tax returns must be submitted.

It is now a requiremen­t of the Master to appoint an independen­t trustee for every new family business trust. Independen­t trustees usually charge a monthly fee for this service.

It is important that one weighs up whether the costs of establishi­ng and managing a trust exceed any savings in terms of estate duty.

However, tax savings should not be the main motivation for setting up a trust in the first place.

If a trust is set up to protect your assets, the benefits of the trust may far outweigh the costs of setting up and maintainin­g it.

For example, setting up and maintainin­g a trust may be a small price to pay when compared with losing all your assets in the event of your sequestrat­ion.

In part two of this article, to be published next week, I will discuss the administra­tive burdens of a trust, taxation, and the responsibi­lities that go with being a trustee.

Van der Spuy is a registered Fiduciary Practition­er of South Africa, a Master Tax Practition­er (SA), a Trust and Estate Practition­er, and the founder of Trusteeze, a profession­al trust practice.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa