This is not the end of fashion – we will dance with a new desire
VANESSA FRIEDMAN
IT IS A truth that may be hard to imagine in a world devastated by illness and economic insecurity, riven by racism and unrest, but we will get dressed again.
Dressed not for the anonymity of the hospital or the essential workforce, the heat and heartbreak of the protest, the anomie of the supermarket or the park, but for the next stage catharsis. Capital D Dressed. It is both history and human nature.
“We will come out of this, like we come out of a war,” said Li Edelkoort, a trend forecaster. “The buildings are still there, but everything is in ruins. We will want two things: security and to dance.
“We will be aching for something new, to refresh our personalities,” she said. “Eccentric clothes, romantic clothes.”
And that is why, after months in which the death of fashion was proclaimed loudly and regularly, a week when it was once again forced to confront its own role in preserving inequality, the motor of the industry has begun to shift into gear once more, in Europe and Asia.
Thus far, there has been a lot of focus on the “system”. A lot of anguish about the need for change and angst over shopping. Will anyone ever want to do it again?
It’s the wrong question.
What we should be asking is: When we re-engage with a world pockmarked by pain, and see one another – from more than just the shoulders up – what will we want to wear?
It sounds ridiculous: Who cares what we will wear when there has been so much tragedy and economic destruction, when old wounds left to fester have been gashed open once again? But the root of that question is as cyclical as history: What will our post-crisis identities look like?
The question of clothes
What will we want our clothes to telegraph about who we have become, and what these complicated experiences have meant? It is the answers to those questions that will pull us into stores again. It is the answers to those questions that will get factories humming again – much more so than interim safety precautions or the changes in fashion shows and clothing deliveries currently being mooted by industry insiders.
Not that there’s anything wrong with those changes; many are laudable, if still in draft form.
The fashion circus is a creaky circus and in need of an update
– not to mention even more meaningful grappling with race and representation in hiring and supply chains. Shows will be entirely digital at least until September, if they happen at all this year.
The British Fashion Council and the Council of Fashion
Designers of America together published a statement effectively urging an end to the travelling precollection extravaganzas.
“Open letters” to the industry have been issued, signed by a variety of retailers and mostly independent designers, pledging allegiance to a “right-seasoning” of store deliveries so that coats are sold when it is cold, bathing suits when it is warm.
Still, the retail bankruptcies keep coming, the numbers get worse and worse.
It’s not going to be a need for more leggings that solves that problem; those we can get online. It’s going to be the irrational, emotional pull of a… something. The gut punch of recognition that comes from seeing a new way to cast your self. One that signals: “Yes, I have changed. Yes, things are different. Now we emerge in a new world.”
It’s on fashion to define that something, because that something is going to be how history remembers whatever happens next. It will do what clothes always do, which is symbolise a moment, and give it visual shape. What that shape will be is the existential question facing designers right now.
The end of (fashion) history Right now, the news is full of intensity, just as previously it was full of Crocs, of speculation that after months of living with elastic waists and stretchy fabrics, we will never go back. That just as white-collar workers will never return to old office life or old office schedules, they will never return to old office dress and the social order that signified.
That may be true, and though it’s possible that this really is the end of fashion as it has been defined and disseminated by the aesthetic empires of the West; that Newton’s third law of motion no longer applies; that the Marxian thesisantithesis-synthesis cycle that has powered our clothing choices for decades is over; it probably is not.
It is even more likely that we will develop some sort of Pavlovian association with the clothes that became the uniforms of our isolation and our impotence; that to see them will send us subconsciously down a wormhole to the pandemic; that what we will need is exactly the opposite.
That’s what the past teaches us anyway.
Times of great trauma also produce moments of great creativity as we attempt to process what we have been through. The functional side of that is fashion. After periods of extremes – war, pandemic, recession – dress is a way to signal the dawning of a new age.
We “will want beautiful things”, Alessandro Michele, the creative director of Gucci, said in a recent Zoom news conference. “The bamboo handle bag was created after World War II. It was a time of the rebirth of beauty.”
That also raises the stakes for an industry that has increasingly treated itself and what it makes as disposable. People may buy clothing that celebrates frivolity. But that is not the same thing as buying frivolously.
Redefining value
Pierpaolo Piccioli of Valentino said via Zoom: “We need something that delivers an idea, a culture. Something that communicates a sense of the hands that have touched a garment, the imagination that has created it, the effort that has gone into it.”
There will be, said Lucie Greene, a consumer insights strategist, a certain amount of shame associated with having the extra income that allows for buying new clothes.
“The continual desire for newness for the sake of newness will feel very inappropriate,” she said.
For years, fashion has fretted about the meaninglessness of its seasons, partly because global warming and globalisation rendered them null and void and partly because there were so many collections.
Now it is actually in everyone’s interests to jettison them entirely. Timeless fashion is fashion that holds its value and can be worn and reworn. It can be sold and resold. It does not become passé in a matter of days. This may mean fewer garments are made and bought and shown. It may mean a contraction of volume that will affect manufacturers.
In the short-term this could be painful, though the short-term is already full of pain. In the longterm it will help solve problems, including that of sustainability. (Eco-materials are good, but fewer materials staying in our closets longer is better.)
As Greene said, “Disaster often accelerates, exponentially, the macro trends that predate its arrival.”