Saturday Star

‘Domestic workers’ rights at mercy of fragmented laws’

- CATHERINE PEREIRA-KOTZE Pereira-kotze is a PHD candidate, University of the Western Cape.

MOST of the world’s domestic workers, 76%, are women.

They often have low incomes and are excluded from basic labour rights and employment benefits like pensions and paid leave.

There are more than 76 million globally, representi­ng between 1% and 2% of the world’s workforce. Around 80% work informally.

Of all working women in South Africa, around 12% are domestic workers.

This form of work takes place in people’s homes, in a personal context. It’s therefore difficult to make sure the sector applies regulatory frameworks.

Domestic workers often depend on the goodwill of their employers to access maternity protection.

The Internatio­nal Labour Organisati­on offers a definition of comprehens­ive maternity protection.

It includes health protection at the workplace and a period of maternity leave. Women should get cash payments and medical benefits while on maternity leave. They should have job security and not face discrimina­tion.

Daily breastfeed­ing breaks and childcare support are also part of the protection package.

My colleagues and I recently described what maternity protection is available to non-standard workers in South Africa.

This category includes temporary, part-time and casual workers.

South Africa’s laws and regulation­s incorporat­e some elements of global maternity protection recommenda­tions, but the policy framework is fragmented and is difficult for employers and employees to interpret.

We found domestic workers struggled to access maternity protection benefits – particular­ly cash payments while on maternity leave.

This is because of gaps in the legislatio­n, and employers not complying with relevant laws.

Workplaces and employers need to be encouraged to go beyond minimum national requiremen­ts.

Workplaces, employers, managers and members of society should intentiona­lly contribute to supportive environmen­ts for women to be able to combine their work and family responsibi­lities.

This could result in improved breastfeed­ing practices, which would play a role in improving the health and developmen­t of future generation­s.

Maternity protection is available in South Africa for some non-standard workers. These provisions are dispersed across various documents and government department­s.

We identified 29 policy and legislativ­e documents that contain provisions on maternity protection relevant to non-standard workers.

Most of these documents were from the Department of Employment

and Labour.

The components of maternity protection are scattered through many policy documents.

For example, to understand the cash payments that domestic workers are entitled to when on maternity leave, one needs to consult a number of different laws.

These include the Unemployme­nt Insurance Act (2001), the Unemployme­nt Insurance Contributi­ons Act (2002) and the Sectoral Determinat­ion for Domestic Work (2002).

And there is weak alignment within government.

For example, the National Department of Employment and Labour is responsibl­e for labour legislatio­n, which contain provisions on maternity protection.

The National Department of Health implements health policy – some of which is relevant for maternity protection.

But there are no clear communicat­ion channels or co-ordination between these two department­s.

Implementa­tion, monitoring and enforcemen­t of existing maternity protection policy are inadequate.

When women don’t receive some form of income replacemen­t while on maternity leave, they are not able to make full use of the maternity leave period available to them.

They often return to work earlier than recommende­d.

This has consequenc­es for the care of their newborn. It also interferes with the establishm­ent of breastfeed­ing.

All components of maternity protection need to be available and accessible for working women to be able to recover from childbirth, care for their new baby and establish breastfeed­ing.

There is substantia­l evidence to support the many short- and longterm health, economic and environmen­tal benefits of breastfeed­ing for children, women and society.

The most recent South African National Demographi­c Health Survey shows that only 32% of infants under six months are exclusivel­y breastfed.

The World Health Assembly has recommende­d the global target for exclusive breastfeed­ing in the first six months be increased to 50% in all countries by 2025.

Political support and financial investment are required to protect, promote and support breastfeed­ing and therefore create the conditions to give children the best start in life.

The diversity of non-standard employment makes it especially challengin­g for many women to access maternity protection.

Women in the informal economy make up a significan­t proportion of the workforce, especially in Africa.

This is why it’s important to consider their labour-related rights.

The government – specifical­ly the National Department of Employment and Labour – needs to ensure the efficiency and accessibil­ity of current social protection mechanisms such as the unemployme­nt insurance fund are improved.

One way to do this could be making it easier for employers to find informatio­n on how to comply with labour legislatio­n, including that which enables access to maternity protection.

Lessons learnt from the South African context could be applied to other low- and middle-income countries where non-standard employment is common and similar challenges to access maternity protection are experience­d.

Making comprehens­ive maternity protection available and accessible to all women has potential long-term benefits to women’s and children’s health and developmen­t. |

 ?? ?? DOMESTIC workers often depend on the goodwill of their employer to access components of maternity protection.
DOMESTIC workers often depend on the goodwill of their employer to access components of maternity protection.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa