Saturday Star

Leisurely retirement further out of reach for most South Africans

- MARTIN HESSE

RETIREMENT. What does the word mean to you? For the enviable few who have built up a decent nest egg, retirement represents a life of leisure as compensati­on for years worked. But that is not the reality for most South Africans.

When 10X Investment­s published its first South African Retirement Reality Report in 2018, it highlighte­d how poorly prepared working South Africans were for retirement. Subsequent reports, including the latest, released recently, have shown that the outlook is worsening by most measures. The 2022 report shows that the warnings of the last four years have had little effect on outcomes, noting that “retirement still holds the prospect of deprivatio­n and disempower­ment for most South Africans”.

The report is based on findings of the 2022 Brand Atlas Survey. Brand Atlas tracks the lifestyles of 15.4 million economical­ly active South Africans (this year defined as people in households with a monthly income of more than R6 000, aged 16 or older, and with internet access) through online surveys. This economical­ly active segment makes up 30% of the population. The data are weighted to reflect the demographi­c profile of this segment.

Some highlights

¡ Retirement plan: almost half of respondent­s (46%) had no retirement plan whatsoever (this has remained relatively constant over four years, as have most other measures). The rest had a plan ranging from “vague” (22%) to “pretty good idea” (23%) to “thought-through” (8%).

¡ Time to save: almost a quarter (24%) of respondent­s believed you could save for a comfortabl­e retirement in under 20 years, indicating that many people mistakenly think it’s okay to start planning for retirement when you’re in your 40s.

¡ Worries about having enough: a majority of respondent­s (62%) agreed partly or strongly with the statement “I worry about whether I will have enough money to live on after I retire”. A small 8% totally disagreed with the statement, down from 12% in 2020. ¡ Intention to work after retirement age: a large majority (71%) agreed partly or strongly with the statement “I expect I will need to keep earning some money after I retire”.

¡ Reasons for not saving: one statistic that has increased quite dramatical­ly over the last two years is the percentage of people who say they can’t afford to save because they have nothing left over at the end of the month – from 56% in 2020 to 70% this year.

Preservati­on problem

So, according to the 10X report, there has been zero progress towards better retirement outcomes. Admittedly, the tough economic times must take much of the blame, as shown in the last statistic above. You can’t encourage people to save if they can’t even afford life’s necessitie­s – there’s a quote by Oscar Wilde, which everyone in the financial education business, myself included, should constantly keep in mind: “To recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less.”

But there is one area where improvemen­t is certainly possible: the preservati­on of existing savings in retirement funds.

National Treasury has tried various strategies to prevent people from cashing in their retirement savings when changing jobs, with little success. It now intends imposing a type of forced savings through its proposed “twopot” system (one third is accessible in emergencie­s, but the other two thirds can be accessed only on turning 55), as covered previously in Personal Finance.

Tobie van Heerden, chief investment officer at 10X Investment­s, is of the view that although the two-pot system will go some way in addressing our retirement crisis, it has not been thought through sufficient­ly.

“Treasury’s original retirement reform proposals aimed to ‘nudge’, rather than force, individual­s into making decisions which serve their long-run interests. That hasn’t worked, as our report confirms, which is why Treasury is now looking at legislatin­g desired behaviour.

“The 'two-pot' proposal, which would oblige the preservati­on of most of their savings while allowing individual­s to access a portion to provide for short-term relief in an emergency, would be a big step forward to resolving South Africa’s crisis, but would not be a golden bullet. It doesn’t apply to the many thousands who are self-employed or in informal work, from street traders to white-collar workers in the gig economy.

“Unfortunat­ely, it seems that the practical implementa­tion has not been comprehens­ively thought through. The complexity of the proposed system will impact member administra­tion heavily, which will have a knock-on effect on costs. By simplifyin­g the proposed legislatio­n, a lot of headaches could have been avoided,” Van Heerden says.

He says that even for those who would fall within the two-pot proposal, other changes would be required to really fix the system, including, but not limited to:

¡ Ensuring compliance with certain standards in all retirement products offered by asset managers and administra­tors, particular­ly around fees, which is such a key factor in determinin­g retirement savings success.

¡ Reviewing contributi­on levels to ensure people are aiming for a goal that would allow them to achieve decent retirement outcomes.

Next week I’ll home in on younger generation­s, who don’t relate to the traditiona­l concept of retirement, but who still need to invest for the long term.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? | Freepik.com
| Freepik.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa