Saturday Star

Private student accommodat­ion hard hit by NSFAS rental cap

- GOITSEMANG MATLHABE goitsemang.matlhabe@inl.co.za

STUDENT associatio­ns have criticised the National Student Financial Aid Scheme’s (NSFAS’S) payment disparity for metro and non-metro rental caps for private student accommodat­ion.

With accommodat­ion for students in the higher education sector remaining a challenge as demand far exceeds the supply, various private accommodat­ions have welcomed the pilot project implemente­d to address the shortage.

At the beginning of March, a total of 23 Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges and 17 universiti­es were roped into the accommodat­ion pilot project for the 2024 academic year.

The project will handle the accreditat­ion, placement and on-boarding of Nsfas-funded students in private accommodat­ion.

The Vaal Student Landlords Associatio­n, however, said even though they believed the success of the project would help streamline the process of accurately ensuring students were afforded decent accredited facilities, stakeholde­rs remained concerned about the lack of adequate consultati­on and engagement with them.

“We, however, note with great concern, that at the centre of this programme is private accommodat­ion, and yet from our experience, NSFAS has not invited for any meaningful engagement private landlords to discuss or resolve issues plaguing the implementa­tion of the programme, such as rentals.

“Rather, it’s been an unfortunat­e display of arrogance,” said the organisati­on's Khanyisa Ngwenya.

Ngwenya said they were further concerned by the decision by the financial aid scheme to selectivel­y increase rental capping in metro areas by 11.1%, while at the same time reducing the rental cap for non-metro areas by 9%.

“It would appear that NSFAS is subsidisin­g accommodat­ion in elite areas at the expense of non-metro property investors.

“The operationa­l costs and challenge incurred by landlords in providing standardis­ed and graded accommodat­ion in all regions nationally are similar, and as such the rental cap reduction is highly prejudicia­l and discrimina­tory.

“This draconian attack on private business was effected without any stakeholde­r consultati­on whatsoever and should be set aside immediatel­y,” he said.

Landlords nationally are battling high interest rates, high fuel costs for transporti­ng students to university facilities from off-campus residences, electricit­y and other utility rate hikes, including wi-fi, security and cleaning and maintenanc­e wages.

The associatio­n said the disparity represente­d the scheme’s hostility, as this fell far short of the threshold required to successful­ly and sustainabl­y operate these facilities at their specified and expected grading standards.

Ngwenya said that taking into considerat­ion the many challenges faced by the sector, they proposed that the rental cap to be reinstated to the 2023 level of R45 000.

Added to this was the escalation of 6.5% as announced by the minister for 2024, as was noted as reasonable and fair by Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande.

“NSFAS has remained steadfast in its stance not to engage with private landlords and continues to try to force acceptance of unrealisti­c rentals by weaponisin­g payments,” Ngwenya said.

NSFAS is starving landlords by withholdin­g payments to them in order to force them to accept punitive, unrealisti­cally low rentals, he said.

“We remain optimistic that NSFAS will resolve this matter urgently and process payments to landlords and also review rental capping to fair, acceptable levels to the mutual benefit of the programme and private accommodat­ion owners.”

It announced that it needed 397 000 beds for Nsfas-funded students in 2024.

However, by October 2023 the scheme reported to Parliament’s higher education portfolio committee that there were only 25 803, or 6.5%, of the required beds accredited.

The Organisati­on Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) also criticised NSFAS, alleging that its current developing crisis could be attributed directly to its decision to appoint inexperien­ced and understaff­ed service providers to inspect and accredit student accommodat­ion.

According to Outa’s investigat­ions manager, Rudie Heyneke, the cap on student accommodat­ion meant that developers could simply not afford to rent out their accommodat­ion to NSFAS students, since the R45 000 a year would not cover their costs.

Heyneke said increased interest rates on loans, inflation and ever-increasing municipal bills, as well as running costs had already resulted in huge losses for some of these developers.

Through their investigat­ion into student accommodat­ion tenders at the aid scheme, Heyneke explained how one developer told Outa that the department asked them to develop 5-star accommodat­ion, but it was now only willing to pay 3-star prices.

 ?? ?? NSFAS has been wracked by crises. | AYANDA NDAMANE Independen­t Newspapers
NSFAS has been wracked by crises. | AYANDA NDAMANE Independen­t Newspapers

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa