SLOW Magazine

Smart TVS and Safety

-

Of all the technologi­cal leaps and bounds we’ve seen over the years, the TV has made quite a large jump. The times when all that our TV sets could do was show us “regular” TV stations are now over. These days, such “old-school” TVS are increasing­ly being replaced with their smart successors, which we can use for streaming video and audio, playing games, browsing the Internet, and downloadin­g and using apps – all of that thanks to their Internet connectivi­ty, says ESET Southern Africa.

This evolution is part of a wider trend that involves connecting consumer electronic­s and everyday objects to the Internet, creating a rapidly growing mass of various Internet of Things (IOT) devices in the process.

However, the Internet connectivi­ty of smart TVS and the perilous state of security in the IOT space in general open the floodgates to a deluge of threats to our privacy and security.

Research has shown that various attacks against smart TVS are possible and practicabl­e, often requiring no physical access to the device or interactio­n from the user. It has also been demonstrat­ed several times that, once compromise­d, an Internet-enabled TV can serve as a springboar­d for attacks at other devices within the same network, ultimately targeting a user’s personal informatio­n stored on even juicier targets such as PCS or laptops.

Now, you probably enjoy watching your smart TV, but chances are that you don’t want it to watch you, too. But watching its watchers is precisely what these TVS can do.

Back in 2013, researcher­s demonstrat­ed that, by exploiting security holes in some models of Samsung’s Internet-capable TVS, it was possible to remotely turn on the built-in camera and microphone. In addition to converting the TVS into all-seeing, allhearing devices, they were able to take control of embedded social-media apps, posting informatio­n on the users’ behalf and accessing files. Another researcher showed off an attack that allowed him to insert fake news stories into the browser of a smart TV.

Malware, too, can find its way into smart TVS and convert them into bugging devices. In this attack vector, which has also been proven practicabl­e, hackers could create a legitimate app before releasing a malicious update that would then be automatica­lly downloaded onto a smart TV fitted with a built-in microphone.

In 2014, a loophole in a widely used interactiv­e TV standard known as HBBTV came to light. It emerged that an attack code could be buried into “rogue” broadcasts and target thousands of smart TVS in one fell swoop, hijacking these as well as other devices in the network, stealing logins, displaying bogus adverts, and even sniffing for unprotecte­d Wi-fi networks. In addition, the attack was found not to require any special hacking smarts.

Issues with HBBTV were in the spotlight again in 2017. A security researcher demonstrat­ed a technique for deploying a rogue over-the-air signal to compromise Internet-enabled television­s. Once taken over by the attacker, the TV could be used for an apparently endless list of malicious actions, including to spy on the user via the TV’S microphone and camera, and to burrow deep into the local network. As many as nine in 10 smart TVS sold in recent years were estimated to be vulnerable to this hack. As with the earlier example, the victim would spot no outward signs of something being amiss.

In February 2018, United States nonprofit organisati­on, Consumer Reports, released the results of hack tests on Internet-connected TVS of five brands, each of which features a different smart TV platform. “Millions of smart TVS can be controlled by hackers exploiting easy-to- find security flaws,” the organisati­on said. The devices were found to be susceptibl­e to rather unsophisti­cated hacks that would enable an attacker to flip through channels, crank up the volume to blaring levels, install new apps, and knock the device off Wi-fi – all remotely, of course.

The review also found that users need to consent to the collection of very detailed data about their viewing habits – unless they’re ready to forgo the smart features of their new smart TV. Over the years, several manufactur­ers have been found to engage in the behind-the-scenes acquisitio­n of – and traffickin­g in – data about the viewing habits of consumers.

Concerns about the implicatio­ns of smart TVS for privacy were also raised in 2015, when Samsung’s voice recognitio­n function – as another layer of convenienc­e that enables you to give voice commands to your smart TV – came to the fore. The company warned its customers who use the voice activation feature on their smart TVS that their private conversati­ons would be among the data captured and shared with third parties. In addition, the voice informatio­n picked up in such “official snooping” was not always encrypted, potentiall­y enabling intruders to listen in on private conversati­ons.

All told, the security conversati­on is here to stay, as a range of private and security concerns persist while more and more consumers are snapping up smart TVS. According to one projection, over 750 million smart TVS will be in use worldwide by the end of 2018.

In this day and age, TVS should no longer be treated as just TVS, but as potential portals into damaging situations.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa