Sowetan

Sandile Zungu Empowermen­t, where did we go wrong?

Discussion on BBBEE reveals how far back black empowermen­t in the economy is lagging

-

Last Thursday, I had the privilege of participat­ing in a reflective discussion on transforma­tion or broadbased black economic empowermen­t (BBBEE).

The event, organised by Sanlam Gauge in partnershi­p with Sowetan’s sister paper Sunday Times, was to launch a BBBEE scorecard report based on research conducted by Intellidex – two years before we commemorat­e 20 years of a formal BBBEE framework and nine years before the review of the National Developmen­t Plan (NDP), our blue-print.

The purpose of this input is to reflect on what went wrong and how this can be corrected 27 years into allrace democracy.

While the report’s numbers are impressive, they conceal a fundamenta­l defect into the applicatio­n of BBBEE: namely, that it hasn’t transforme­d the economy and has, in essence, been reduced into a cynical, malicious compliance exercise.

The commanding heights of the economy – banks, mines, agricultur­e and factories – are still in minority hands (white South Africans and foreigners), and blacks have only been accommodat­ed to about 30% of ownerships at best with weak, if at all, management grip of the companies in which they are invested.

In fact, what has happened since 1993 has been a corporate restructur­ing or an exercise by shareholde­rs of large, mainly white-owned companies to accommodat­e a few blacks as co-owners of these entities. It’s significan­t that at that point, there was no BBBEE legislativ­e let alone policy framework. To be generous, perhaps, these companies were motivated by enlightene­d self-interest.

Simultaneo­usly, a few more large companies co-opted some black directors, mainly men, onto their boards.

It was only in 2003 that the BBBEE Act was passed providing, for the first time, a framework for transforma­tion – again, mainly corporate restructur­ing. A few years later, codes of good practice provided more detail regarding implementa­tion.

The end result is what we have today: that is, at best, companies are legally bound to only accommodat­e 30% of us blacks despite the fact that we are in the majority.

Left unchalleng­ed, this is a recipe for an impending social conflagrat­ion.

How did we get here? First, the BBBEE Act merely sought to accommodat­e black Africans instead of making them the real owners.

Second, our white compatriot­s have become too cynical about the whole democracy project. Not only are they resentful, but some are spiteful of it and its commitment­s. This is reflected in the approach towards BBBEE and demands that “once empowered always empowered” and, in worse instances, black executives are replaced by mediocre white males.

Third, corruption has set in with the implementa­tion of BBBEE.

Fourth, there appears to be fatigue across the board, especially government. In the past decade, some noble piecemeal initiative­s – such as the 100 black industrial­ists programme – have found their way into the policy agenda as the same government was refusing to recapitali­se the National Empowermen­t Fund.

The BBBEE Commission, the watchdog, took years and has yet to imprison any of the fraudsters who have used their domestic helpers and gardeners as BBBEE shareholde­rs without the latter’s knowledge.

And fifth, the past decade has seen no major BBBEE deals, and there appears no credible plan to transform the next frontiers of growth: renewables and green economy; telecommun­ications ; agro-processing; cannabis; and so on.

We need economic restructur­ing not corporate restructur­e which has failed. We need a plan to transfer 70% ownership and management control of the economy into black majority hands by 2030.

 ??  ??
 ?? Sandile Zungu ??
Sandile Zungu
 ?? /123RF ?? A fundamenta­l defect of BBBEE is that it hasn’t transforme­d the economy.
/123RF A fundamenta­l defect of BBBEE is that it hasn’t transforme­d the economy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa