Sunday Times

Nkandla: Thuli sticks to her guns

Madonsela resists cabinet pressure to drop probe into Zuma estate

- CHRIS BARRON

MEMBERS of President Jacob Zuma’s cabinet tried to strongarm public protector Thuli Madonsela at two meetings into dropping her investigat­ion into his R208-million upgrade of his private Nkandla estate.

Several ministers and state law adviser Enver Daniels have confirmed there were discussion­s and meetings, but not that Madonsela was asked to back off.

A source with direct knowledge of the discussion­s told the Sunday Times, however, that Madonsela was twice told to stop her investigat­ion but insisted she had a right and a duty to pursue the probe requested by Democratic Alliance parliament­ary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko.

Mazibuko said the interventi­on was an “outrageous” violation of the constituti­onal protection of the independen­ce of the public protector’s office.

“There is no circumstan­ce under which this is OK,” she said yesterday.

Ministers Thulas Nxesi of public works, Nathi Mthethwa of police and Siyabonga Cwele of state security tried at the first meeting, held at police headquarte­rs in Pretoria, to persuade Madonsela the job could better be done by the auditorgen­eral, Terence Nombembe.

After Madonsela rejected a letter from the state attorney’s office purporting to record her agreement to drop the investigat­ion, she met four ministers at the offices of the Department of Public Works, the source said.

Daniels, who is known to have attended at least one of the meetings, confirmed that he was consulted on legal issues surroundin­g the probe into the massive revamp of Zuma’s estate in KwaZulu-Natal.

“I was asked to advise on certain aspects. I may have made some recommenda­tions but the profession­al ethics of my office mean I cannot talk about that,” he said.

Nxesi said ministers in the security cluster had several meetings with Madonsela.

“We won’t comment on the content of our discussion­s. But that we persuaded her not to investigat­e is nonsense. We reject that claim,” he said.

Asked if he had wanted Madonsela to look into the Nkandla spending, Nxesi did not mention the public protector but said only: “Our preliminar­y report, which we released at the beginning of the year, talks to processes being taken by the AG [auditor-general] and the SIU [Special Investigat­ing Unit].”

He said later that ministers had cooperated with Madonsela.

Zuma told parliament in November: “My residence in Nkandla has been paid for by the Zuma family. All the buildings and every room we use . . . was built by ourselves as family and not by government. I have never asked government to build a home for me, and it has not done so. A necessary distinctio­n must therefore be made between work which I have mandated and initiated in my home, as opposed to the security enhancemen­t undertaken by government,” he said.

It has since emerged that so-

Madonsela was told to stop, but insisted she had a right and a duty to pursue the probe

called security upgrades included a new shop for Zuma’s first wife, tunnels, a cattle culvert, a bunker, sports fields, a clinic and other enhancemen­ts.

Nxesi commission­ed the only other investigat­ion into the Nkandla spending — an internal public works probe — but classified the report top secret and refused to discuss it in public. He suggested initially that it had been classified by Cwele, but later admitted he had himself decided to keep it secret.

At the second meeting with Madonsela, Nxesi, Mthethwa, Justice Minister Jeff Radebe and Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula told her that Nombembe had launched an investigat­ion, and they again urged her to leave it to him.

Radebe eventually agreed at that meeting, however, that Madonsela should continue her parallel investigat­ion.

The Sunday Times has establishe­d that neither the auditor-general nor the SIU has implemente­d any inquiry into the Nkandla spending.

“Up to now, we have not received any indication that the auditor-general’s expertise is needed,” said Africa Boso,

Nombembe’s spokesman. “This is an indication that the public protector is fully and capably in control of this process.”

Madonsela confirmed through a spokesman yesterday that she had met several ministers, but declined to say what was discussed.

“Government has already informed the nation that there was a meeting on August 8 2013 preceded by a meeting on July 2. There have been other meetings but . . . the public protector is unable to confirm what was discussed,” her office said.

Madonsela visited Zuma’s estate with Mapisa-Nqakula in August last year. She is expected to complete her investigat­ion within days and will send a draft to Mazibuko and to all the people and agencies involved in the Nkandla upgrade for comment.

Other ministers said in a joint statement issued by justice spokesman Mthunzi Mhaga that they had not tried to pressure Madonsela.

“The ministers of the justice, crime prevention and security cluster confirm that there have been interactio­ns and meetings with the public protector pertaining to the Nkandla investigat­ion. The ministers wish to emphasise that some of these meetings were held at the request of the public protector, in pursuance of her mandate. The insinuatio­ns raised by faceless sources with respect to the purpose of these legitimate interactio­ns are dismissed as devoid of any truth,” they said.

Mazibuko asked the public protector in September last year to investigat­e “whether any undue influence was placed on the Department of Public Works to allocate these funds, whether the funds have been properly budgeted for, whether any funds have been transferre­d from other much- needed projects for this revamp and whether the allocation of funds to what is essentiall­y a private home — which will not remain in the state’s ownership — represents irregular expenditur­e”.

She said yesterday it was particular­ly inappropri­ate for Radebe to have participat­ed in a meeting to discuss Madonsela’s inquiries because his department funds her office, but has no authority over it.

Radebe’s office urged the public to await Madonsela’s report. — Additional reporting by Caiphus Kgosana, Mzilikazi wa Afrika, Sibusiso Ngalwa and Brendan Boyle

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa