Sunday Times

Shifting sands eat up Oyster Bay

Residents say authoritie­s won’t let them save their properties

- BOBBY JORDAN jordanb@sundaytime­s.co.za

FIRST the doormat disappeare­d, then the garden wall.

Then, when the right side of their retirement house vanished beneath a sand dune, Gill and Konrad Brandstett­er bought a front-end loader.

It was too little, too late. The street in front of their house disappeare­d, along with the electricit­y meter, swallowed by a moving mountain of sand. A neighbour’s kitchen ceiling collapsed — too much sand had blown in through the roof tiles.

And the Eastern Cape provincial government has banned residents of Oyster Bay from interferin­g with its sand dunes.

The small holiday town, built on a shifting 30km dune belt, is fighting a losing battle against nature as beachfront houses are being buried. Residents claim their pleas for help are ignored.

Four years ago, the town lost four houses after the government refused to allow residents to bulldoze away a sand dune blocking the local river. The houses collapsed into the river after it burst its banks.

Now a second dune has started swallowing houses east of the river mouth, raising an outcry and sparking legal squabbles.

Residents have spent almost R300 000 on a dune management plan and environmen­tal impact assessment and say the government has abandoned them.

“The sand will definitely swallow my house if we don’t keep moving it — it is very sad to think about that happening,” said Gill, who can now only enter her home via a neighbouri­ng property. “Our neigh- bour has threatened to fence his plot off because we are accessing our house over his land, which he is trying to sell.”

She said they had spent more than R250 000 to keep the sand at bay. But the dune was relentless: “As we open the door to our house, after shovelling away the sand at the back door before entering the house, we have to clean all counter tops, shake out covers over all furniture . . . And sweep floors.”

Desperate, the Brandstett­ers bought a three-ton loader to fight the sand, but were stopped in December by provincial environmen­tal affairs authoritie­s. “They said they’d move the sand themselves in January,” Gill said. “We are still waiting.”

A private company offered to move the sand free of charge to use at a nearby wind farm, but was prevented due to red tape, the Sunday Times has learnt.

Resident Keith Mutch said he had tried to keep the sand out by building sand breaks. “Power meters and water meters to homes have been covered in over 2m of sand, so the local municipali­ty just ran pipes and cables to meters over the sand to the houses so they could still charge utility fees,” he said.

The province’s environmen­tal affairs spokesman, Sixolile Makaula, confirmed that the department had left the dunes untouched but said it was hoping to solve the problem.

“This is poor planning inher- ited,” he said. “The coastal town of Oyster Bay is in the path of the migrating dune field. Sand dunes migrate and natural processes can to a degree be controlled, but never stopped.”

Kouga municipali­ty spokeswoma­n Laura-Leigh Randall said the town had done a basic assessment to obtain permission to remove the sand and submitted it to the Department of Environmen­tal Affairs in November for approval.

“We expect to receive a response from them within the next few weeks.”

 ?? Picture: ESA ALEXANDER ?? DROPPING IN: Oyster Bay resident Ronnie Swemma sandboards towards the Brandstett­ers’ house
Picture: ESA ALEXANDER DROPPING IN: Oyster Bay resident Ronnie Swemma sandboards towards the Brandstett­ers’ house
 ?? Picture: GILL BRANDSTETT­ER ?? SHIFTY BEHAVIOUR: Gill and Konrad Brandstett­er tried to keep the sand away from the their home with a front-end loader, but the authoritie­s stopped them
Picture: GILL BRANDSTETT­ER SHIFTY BEHAVIOUR: Gill and Konrad Brandstett­er tried to keep the sand away from the their home with a front-end loader, but the authoritie­s stopped them

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa