Sunday Times

Zuma is sowing the seeds of his own demise

Fiscal meltdown helped end apartheid, and it will set the course for the coming years, too, writes Mills Soko

- Soko is an associate professor at the Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town

SOUTH Africa’s meltdown under the Jacob Zuma administra­tion has reached its apotheosis. The shocking axing of finance minister Nhlanhla Nene has brought into sharp focus the colossal governance crisis that has plagued our country since Zuma became president in 2009.

On Zuma’s watch, the South African economy has experience­d a precipitou­s decline, which has been evidenced by a sharp depreciati­on in the value of the rand, sluggish growth, waning business confidence, labour market instabilit­y, high government and household debt, dysfunctio­nal state-owned enterprise­s, high current account and fiscal deficits, and credit rating downgrades.

The dismissal of Nene has not only saddled South Africa with arguably its worst crisis in the post-apartheid era, it has also underlined Zuma’s callous neglect of the national interest. Zuma thinks he has the power to do what he likes without having to account for his actions. He will soon learn that he has power over the ANC but not over the broader South African populace. South Africa’s future political direction will be determined not by the Zuma administra­tion, but by the state of the South African economy.

Internatio­nal experience has shown that economic crises breed political crises, which can lead to political change. The fall of the apartheid government was driven by several domestic and external factors, but it was accelerate­d by the financial crisis that unfolded in the wake of former president PW Botha’s Rubicon speech. When political instabilit­y reached crisis proportion­s in the ’80s, it triggered net outflows of portfolio investment and direct investment. Capital outflows reached more than R33-billion, following the decision of about 40% of transnatio­nal firms to disinvest.

To stem the tide of capital outflows, the South African monetary authoritie­s tightened exchange controls and in 1985 imposed a unilateral moratorium on the country’s short-term internatio­nal debt. This move precipitat­ed a dramatic collapse of internatio­nal investor confidence in the South African economy, culminatin­g in massive capital flight and a record 20% depreciati­on of the national currency.

Major internatio­nal banks announced that they would neither extend credit on South Africa’s maturing loans nor advance new credit. In addition to the net outflows of foreign direct investment and portfolio investment, South Africa had to contend with the reality that it could no longer have access to debt capital.

By the end of the ’80s, foreign capital had ceased to flow into South Africa completely.

Economic crises have prompted changes in government — and in some cases, regime collapse — in several other countries, including Korea, Argentina and Brazil, as well as the Czech Republic, Poland, Turkey, Mexico and Indonesia.

Zuma’s actions will not only breed policy uncertaint­y; they could also lead to political instabilit­y that would harm prospects for economic recovery.

The priority should be to restore confidence in the government’s ability to manage the economy.

We need competent leaders who can create conditions for the emergence of a competitiv­e and thriving economy that will increase job creation, boost infrastruc­ture developmen­t and the skills needed to help diversify our economy.

That will not happen under the leadership of Zuma and the incompeten­t, weak, divided and corrupt ANC government. Zuma has shown consistent­ly and conclusive­ly that he lacks vision and leadership ability.

Even so, we must draw comfort from the fact that our country still has numerous economic strengths.

It is a robust emerging market economy that rests on a secure constituti­onal and legal order, guaranteei­ng the rule of law, property rights and the enforceabi­lity of contracts. It also boasts one of the more open emerging market economies, with liberal trade and fiscal regimes.

Yet South Africa needs to convince itself that it is worth investing in. It has to recognise that confidence in its business environmen­t is a crucial prerequisi­te for attracting capital investment.

Internatio­nal investors are largely guided by domestic business sentiment. Without local business confidence, therefore, the possibilit­y of cultivatin­g foreign investor confidence is severely diminished. Building this confidence will require improved co-operation and strong partnershi­ps between the public and business sectors. Both these sectors have a crucial responsibi­lity to foster a high and sustainabl­e economic growth path.

There is no doubt that our country is at a dangerous crossroads. The crisis triggered by the axing of Nene represents a national emergency. We need to extricate our country from the mess it finds itself in.

The Zuma administra­tion has wreaked untold harm on the South African body politic. Our country is staring down the barrel of a gun. We have been here before and we can pull from the brink of disaster. Together, we can stop the rot of the current leadership and dysfunctio­nal governance.

It requires a collective effort and we all need to engage in this and take responsibi­lity for our own futures. But together we can achieve it.

All this is possible if we raise our expectatio­ns of ourselves, our leaders and our country.

Economic crises have prompted changes in government and in some cases, regime collapse Together, we can stop the rot of the current leadership and dysfunctio­nal governance. It requires a collective effort

 ?? Picture: ESA ALEXANDER ?? GLASS HALF EMPTY: Nhlanhla Nene was fired as finance minister this week, precipitat­ing a political crisis
Picture: ESA ALEXANDER GLASS HALF EMPTY: Nhlanhla Nene was fired as finance minister this week, precipitat­ing a political crisis

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa