Sunday Times

Corporate fear that hobbles staff

Companies have more to gain than to lose from ‘intraprene­urship’

-

IRECENTLY sat on a panel of entreprene­urs as part of a training programme for high performers at one of the biggest corporatio­ns in South Africa.

This is not common in corporate training programmes, especially since big companies shy away from encouragin­g their teams to listen to entreprene­urs and gain ideas on how they can be more entreprene­urial in their roles or ventures.

Companies are typically scared of losing their best performers to entreprene­urship.

The reality is that, in a constantly changing world, companies have no choice but to develop some form of entreprene­urial culture to survive.

The buzz word normally used to refer to this is “intraprene­urship” — the concept that companies can become more profitable by incorporat­ing elements of an entreprene­urial culture.

They do this by encouragin­g entreprene­urial behaviours such as innovation, risk-taking and ownership.

This is not easy to achieve, especially for big companies where long-standing routines, bureaucrac­y and hierarchie­s can stand in the way of innovators. When companies attempt to be intraprene­urial, they try to do this within the confines of the existing organisati­onal structures and processes. This ends up crippling the employees who actually have a propensity for intraprene­urship.

An alternativ­e way of dealing with this is to first accept that employees have different levels of entreprene­urial acumen.

There are those who perform best when allowed to be entreprene­urial within an organisati­on. There are those who prefer to keep a full-time job while gaining their energy from an entreprene­urial project outside of work. There are those who are best being full-time entreprene­urs.

When a company aspires to be more entreprene­urial, it needs to be prepared to support the different kinds of entreprene­urs that emerge from fostering an entreprene­urial culture.

This is even more critical among high performers, as you want them to be performing at their best, independen­t of the current organisati­onal set-up. Instead of being afraid to lose the top performers who want to become entreprene­urs, companies should be helping them to find ways to develop their entreprene­urial ideas.

Imagine what could happen if a topperform­ing employee was given a chance to become the top-performing entreprene­ur they were destined to become? They could run their pilots within the organisati­on and let the employer be the first client. The company already has an excellent track record on the employee’s abilities and acumen. The employee has the potential to grow into being among the best suppliers for the company.

Both the company and the individual stand to gain when the “employee-turned-entreprene­ur” is best positioned to benefit themselves and the business.

This will change the current mentality of people hiding their afterwork entreprene­urial pursuits out of fear. Instead, they will bring these pursuits forward, in the hopes of creating a win-win solution for everyone.

What happened with Vodacom and the Please Call Me idea is an example of this. This was an innovative idea from an employee that was developed and helped the organisati­on to reap returns. The only mistake was not putting the employee in a position where he could also benefit.

The result was a win-lose situation — hence the lawsuit that followed.

Not everyone with entreprene­urial acumen hungers for the risk and rush that come from being a full-time business owner. Some people gain their energy from having entreprene­urial projects on the side, while maintainin­g a full-time job.

If the employee is more energetic and productive when balancing both work and entreprene­urial hobbies, there is no reason why this should be discourage­d.

We need to move away from the attitude that side projects can make employees lose focus. Some are actually energised by it.

More and more big companies are developing incubation hubs to improve the low levels of entreprene­urship around the country. There is no reason why these hubs should not be made available for use by the company’s employees, too.

I was motivated to see that big corporate I mentioned above being open to allowing its high-performing staff to learn from a range of entreprene­urs. As a result, the employees become more open to discussing how they and the business could benefit from them developing their own entreprene­urial projects, full time or part time.

This company was not operating from a fear of losing top performers. It was encouragin­g everyone to become their best selves — independen­t of the organisati­on’s existing structures and routines.

If someone is an entreprene­ur at heart, we should let them be that.

People perform at their best when they follow their calling. We should encourage everyone to find what that calling is.

For some, it is being on some form of an entreprene­urial path. It is about time companies started supporting this among their teams. Everyone involved stands to benefit.

This cripples employees who actually have a propensity for intraprene­urship

Sikhakhane is an internatio­nal speaker, writer and business adviser with an honours degree in business science from the University of Cape Town and an MBA from Stanford University

 ??  ?? Zipho Sikhakhane
Zipho Sikhakhane

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa