Sunday Times

The bureaucrat­ic buffer that can save a state

- PETER BRUCE

Lost in the swirl of the demented South African political news cycle last week was an absolutely critical announceme­nt: from now on, directors-general in the government will report to the president. In other words, we may have seen the end of new ministers strolling into ministries or department­s and almost instantly suspending or firing the sitting director-general.

Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma was a serial DG abuser when she was a minister, but almost all of Jacob Zuma’s many cabinet reshuffles meant that some blameless DG would be accused of a breach of the Public Finance Management Act and be suspended on full pay while some toady audit firm carried out a long and expensive “forensic” investigat­ion that never seemed to include an interview with the suspended figure themselves.

One of the central tenets of the National Developmen­t Plan, drawn up by Cyril Ramaphosa and Trevor Manuel, adopted as official ANC policy in Mangaung in 2012 and completely ignored by Zuma, is the notion of a “capable state”. Remember?

But you can’t have a capable state if you keep firing the people running it. What Ramaphosa has done now is the beginning of what we should all hope becomes a much more profession­al, experience­d and focused bureaucrac­y.

Ideally, what Ramaphosa should do is appoint a head of the civil service, a senior bureaucrat who works out of the Presidency and who can report to the cabinet but has the power to keep the rest of the civil service independen­t of political interferen­ce.

Some of you may remember the very funny British TV series Yes Minister, in which deeply experience­d civil servants pretend to obey idiot ministers with strange ideas. Under pressure to save money, the general affairs minister says to his DG: “I think we’ll scrap the Royal Navy.”

“Oh that’s a wonderful idea, Minister,” shoots back the bureaucrat. “Very courageous.” “Is it? Good,” says the preening minister before wilting as he realises that doing anything “courageous” in politics is usually the last thing you do in politics.

The point being that a capable state isn’t run by politician­s. It is run by trained and experience­d bureaucrat­s. It was the exiled ANC’s greatest mistake not to appreciate this. Swapo trained its officials and was ready to run Namibia when the time came. Chilean exiles under General Augusto Pinochet swarmed all over US universiti­es and when Pinochet fell, that country’s bureaucrac­y saved it. At all levels, Chilean bureaucrat­s are astonishin­gly efficient. It’s a matter of pride.

The same can happen in South Africa. A head of the civil service would decide who was to be DG of what department. They would have a string of bureaucrat­s moving through Harvard, Stanford, Oxford and Cambridge university courses all the time. South African universiti­es like Wits, UCT and Stellenbos­ch offer public administra­tion degrees and some are really excellent. The job would require legal protection from political interferen­ce, so Ramaphosa would have to choose carefully. You want a stickler for the rules, a sort of kindly sergeant-major type who will immediatel­y intervene to help out a brother or sister DG under undue ministeria­l pressure to authorise a flight, sneak a gift or skip a promised appearance in parliament.

What you want to achieve with a distinct, if not totally independen­t, civil service is a tradition of excellence in service, of ignoring the politics and keeping the machine of state running. Politician­s are by nature volatile and unpredicta­ble, the two qualities you most badly do not want in a bureaucrat.

There’s a ministeria­l handbook, we always hear. It should be up to DGs to know what’s in it and to enforce it. Until now they haven’t had the power. Led by a quality citizen, the club of DGs, under the watchful embrace of the Presidency, could be a huge force for good in South Africa. Until now, a politician has been able to walk into a department as a new minister and get expensive new cars, travel wherever, hire family. Whatever. That will now end, I think we can presume.

Try, if you can bear it, to imagine what this country would feel like had Dlamini-Zuma won the ANC leadership election last December. Ramaphosa has got rid of Tom Moyane at the South African Revenue Service, survived a Moody’s rating, removed the corrupt boards at Eskom, Denel, SAA and soon, it seems, Transnet. Zuma is on trial. Ramaphosa has fired 10 dreadful ministers, set up a determined drive to attract investment into South Africa and now is strengthen­ing our public administra­tion. Not bad for two-and-a-bit months.

And I reckon we ain’t seen nothing yet.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa