Sunday Times

Please call me patient

Please Call Me funders seek share of ‘R49m’ Vodacom payout

- By ASHA SPECKMAN speckman@sundaytime­s.co.za

● Nearly two decades after he came up with his “Please Call Me” idea, Nkosana Makate still faces a protracted dispute over money — this time with the company that funded his case against Vodacom.

Makate’s dispute with the funders, Raining Men Trade, is heading to court-ruled arbitratio­n next month over the funders’ claim to a share of his settlement with Vodacom.

Raining Men Trade puts the settlement sum at R49m, but neither Vodacom nor Makate are willing to disclose the figure. Makate has said he will contest the amount offered by Vodacom, which he called an “insult”.

A spokespers­on for Raining Men said: “We’re looking at a long-haul litigation still. It will be long before we get to the arbitratio­n.”

A 2016 court order ruled that the funders are entitled to half of Makate’s award.

Makate gave Vodacom the Please Call Me idea in 2000, but the company failed to pay him for it.

● Nkosana Makate and his former funders in the Please Call Me matter are heading to arbitratio­n next month, as a battle over whether his financiers are entitled to a share of his settlement with Vodacom escalates.

But it seems that arbitratio­n could again be delayed as the funder, Raining Men Trade, intends to launch an applicatio­n to remove the arbitrator, advocate Andrew Mabena, citing various conflicts of interest.

Thomas Samons, Raining Men Trade’s business rescue practition­er, said on Friday the arbitratio­n was set down for eight days towards the end of June, “where we are calling witnesses. It’s got to do with Makate’s submission that the original agreement is no longer valid and that the nomination of Raining Men did not in fact take place. So, we say of course the original agreement is still in place and the nomination did take place.”

Samons said Raining Men had also informed Makate’s attorneys of the applicatio­n to remove the arbitrator. They have 20 days left to file the applicatio­n.

“We’re looking at a long-haul litigation still. It will be long before we get to the arbitratio­n,” he said.

He said he knew that Makate’s attorneys had advised him to settle. There is a 2016 court order that the funders are entitled to half of Makate’s award. According to that order, Vodacom must pay half the award into a trust account until arbitratio­n is concluded.

“We have told his attorney that we are not stuck on that order. I’m in a position to offer him a settlement number because I’ve got my side of funders to refund. There’s a minimum amount which I can consider,” Samons said, but declined to reveal the amount, saying he would have to consult creditors first.

However, Makate said: “There is no talk of a settlement. There is nothing that can be offered to them. That ship has long left the harbour. We are proceeding with the arbitratio­n on 19 June as ruled by the arbitrator.”

At stake is half of R49m, the alleged settlement amount that Vodacom CEO Shameel Joosub approved as compensati­on for Makate in January this year.

The amount is cited in court papers filed in April this year by Raining Men Trade, but it has not been officially confirmed by Vodacom or Makate due to confidenti­ality agreements. Makate intends to challenge the settlement in court, claiming earlier this year that it was a “insult” to him.

Raining Men Trade is in business rescue but Samons filed an urgent applicatio­n in the Pretoria high court last month to delay arbitratio­n with Makate, saying he had not had sufficient time to prepare as he was appointed in January this year.

Makate gave Vodacom the idea in 2000 for a service that could allow for text messages requesting a call back to be sent between subscriber­s, with or without airtime. Vodacom developed and commercial­ised the idea but reneged on an agreement to compensate Makate.

The matter has spent over a decade in court with the Constituti­onal Court ruling in 2016 that Vodacom and Makate had to negotiate reasonable and fair compensati­on.

Raining Men Trade claims its representa­tive, Chris Schoeman, a lawyer, made an agreement in 2011 to finance Makate’s litigation. Makate, in his replying affidavit, claims the agreement was cancelled in January 2014 after the case flopped in the high court.

He appealed against the high court judgment and won his case against Vodacom in the Constituti­onal Court. Raining Men Trade returned, trying to enforce the funding agreement. The parties disagreed and went to court, which referred the matter for arbitratio­n.

The arbitrator says in court papers that he told the parties about the arbitratio­n in November last year and would be neglecting his duties were the proceeding­s delayed or postponed.

Makate claimed the business rescue proceeding­s were a “sham” because Raining Men Trade was a shelf company without any business and was used as a vehicle to channel his payout from Vodacom.

Samons said companies previously linked to the matter, Sterling Rand and Black Rock, were never properly nominated or accepted the nomination.

“It was left to Raining Men to take up the nomination later and the reason for that is because the funding came from all sorts of different parties. They kept asking for new companies in which they could participat­e in the litigation funding. But eventually it all settled on a company called Raining Men, which is now in business rescue.”

There is no talk of a settlement. There is nothing that can be offered to them. That ship has long left the harbour

Nkosana Makate

Please Call Me inventor

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Nkosana Makate
Nkosana Makate

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa