Sunday Times

Eskom is beyond repair

It’s time to dump it, says Rudy Oosterwyk

- By RUDY OOSTERWYK Oosterwyk is the director of Social Sector Strategy and Advisory Services, a consulting firm operating in the social developmen­t sector

● The president’s bogus claim that Eskom is being sabotaged is as rusted as the bolt Alec Erwin left in one of the turbines at the Koeberg power station back in 2006. Wet coal, broken conveyer belts, sabotage and bolts in the turbines are the lies of a failed business and a distractio­n from the real question: what is the socioecono­mic impact on the 30-millionplu­s South Africans living in poverty if we lose an estimated R5bn a day every time the lights go off?

SA’s GDP growth rate for 2019 has already been downgraded by most agencies and banks and is now projected at between 0.6% and 0.8% per annum, a far cry from the stimulus required for a job- and wealthcrea­ting economy “for all”. What this all means is higher consumer prices, increased job losses and fewer jobs available in the market, even lower levels of savings and investment, lower tax revenue, lower to almost zero levels of economic growth over the next decade and significan­t increases in our social grant budgets.

The unpreceden­ted stage 6 load-shedding seen this week was not sabotage, but rather the climactic and accumulate­d effect of systemic incompeten­ce, political ineptitude and corruption. Eskom is broken beyond repair and Andre de Ruyter, its new CEO, will be unable to fix it. Diminishin­g economic growth as a result of the structural, operationa­l and financial fault lines that run deep across the many dimensions of this failed business will simply be too much to turn around.

Eskom’s proposed unbundling into three separate state-owned entities, namely generation, transmissi­on and distributi­on, will not turn the tide for this failed company. Unbundling such a massive failure will create strategic and operationa­l challenges that allow leadership to escape accountabi­lity. That is the real sabotage. The current vision under a “single” Eskom reads: “To provide electricit­y in an efficient and sustainabl­e manner, including generation, transmissi­on and distributi­on and retail’’. It cannot do this now and it will not be able to do this across three separate operations.

Unbundling is the last nail in the corporate coffin of this entity and De Ruyter will be its undertaker and the fall guy. By the winter of 2025, with De Ruyter firmly at the helm, technical mumbo-jumbo and race politics (De Ruyter is white) will be the absurdity of our national dialogue in keeping the state constituti­onally culpable for single-handedly increasing the burden of poverty on the most vulnerable, through its continued support of Eskom.

Eskom’s debt stands at R450bn. Its 2019 revenue was R179.8bn, with a recorded loss of R20.7bn. The company will seek a further R340bn in loans by 2022, raising its stake in the GDP to 8%. R218bn of the debt is covered by guarantees by the government, compliment­s of the taxpayer. The government has committed an additional R59bn in a bailout package so that Eskom could cover its debt over the next three years. This is in addition to the R122bn Eskom will cost taxpayers over the next three years.

Failures at Medupi and Kusile at a cost of R300bn, (with an estimated R36bn in overruns) with poor constructi­on, will severely compromise our generating capacity by 2025. We will see sustained blackouts now leading up to 2020 with a near collapse of the system by 2023 as it would be too expensive to fix the infrastruc­ture mess at Medupi, never mind the maintenanc­e of the full national grid. This, together with the theft of approximat­ely R129bn in these two projects and the stalling of power purchase agreements over the past 10 years, will be central flashpoint­s in the demise of Eskom. Our economy will be sent into a nosedive by 2024 as Eskom haemorrhag­es onto our national balance sheet, bringing it further and further into the red.

There is no proposed financial plan on the table for Eskom to generate its own revenue other than its dependence on the taxpayer and cosmetic unbundling. Its balance sheet is an affront to our constituti­onal democracy. It is not developmen­tal, and it is unsustaina­ble. Eskom needs to generate electricit­y for a growing economy at about 6% by 2030 as per the National Developmen­t Plan. This is a fiction as we continue to hover at 0.8% while we wrestle with: 1) still servicing the cost of the arms deal at R70bn; 2) the estimated loss of R500bn through state capture on the president’s estimation; 3) the R27.4bn revenue shortfall in 2019 due to sluggish economic growth; 4) increased bailouts for SAA amounting to R5bn in October with an additional ask of R3.5bn in December, bringing the total over 10 years to just under R40bn; 5) our youth unemployme­nt rate of just above 50% — with jobless economic growth as the norm, this figure will increase over the next decade and provide fertile ground for a change in government by 2030-2033.

We remain the most unequal society in the world, and dumping Eskom once and for all is now a social justice imperative. We must build an entirely new energy architectu­re that will result in job creation and economic developmen­t for decades to come.

Bolder plans are now required and must include the following on the cabinet’s priority list:

Phasing out coal and diesel as primary sources by 2030; increasing renewable energy to a 70% contributo­r to the grid by 2028; repatriati­ng Eskom revenue to independen­t power producers, with provincial electricit­y authoritie­s regulating the pricing structures by 2027; communitie­s retaining 49% equity ownership in the IPPs with specific emphasis on women ownership; profits on the sale of electricit­y capped at 14% of the unit cost; subsidisin­g all households to generate a percentage of their own electricit­y and buy back additional electricit­y available to the national grid; identifyin­g failed agricultur­al farms in provinces with high wind and sun exposure and turning them into electricit­y co-ops to service local communitie­s; renting out all other SOEs and asking for a 35% annual return with zero tax revenue input into the SOE sector by 2030.

The political mantra that Eskom is too big to fail is rubbish. The political call should be; “Eskom is too big a mistake to save.” Sadly, Eskom’s failures mean that we will be unable to turn the tide on the multidimen­sional layers of poverty that characteri­se the existence of black South Africans.

 ??  ??
 ?? Picture: Waldo Swiegers/Getty Images ?? Eskom’s Grootvlei coal-fired power station in Mpumalanga. The writer calls for a new energy architectu­re, including phasing out coal and diesel as primary sources by 2030.
Picture: Waldo Swiegers/Getty Images Eskom’s Grootvlei coal-fired power station in Mpumalanga. The writer calls for a new energy architectu­re, including phasing out coal and diesel as primary sources by 2030.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa