Sunday Times

Schools urged to tighten policies after deaths

- By PREGA GOVENDER and GRAEME HOSKEN

● There was obvious negligence in the events leading to the drowning this month of two 13-year-old pupils in separate incidents, but a lack of clear guidelines on water safety measures for pupils on school trips means proving liability may not be clear-cut.

The body of grade 7 Bekker Primary School pupil Keamohetsw­e Shaun Seboko was discovered at the bottom of the school’s pool in Magaliesbu­rg, Gauteng, last Wednesday. On the same day, grade 8 Parktown Boys’ High pupil Enoch Mpianzi drowned at the Nyati Bush and Riverbreak lodge in North West during an orientatio­n camp.

Parktown Boys’ headmaster Malcolm Williams was suspended this week amid an investigat­ion by the education department. The principal of Bekker Primary, Willy Potgieter, has not been suspended, according to the school’s governing body.

National regulation­s on safety measures for schools, adopted by the department in 2001, put the responsibi­lity for ensuring the water safety of pupils on school trips and at school primarily on the principal.

Gauteng regulation­s on school tours do not specifical­ly mention water-safety measures.

While schools across SA insist that parents sign an indemnity form, the national regulation­s are clear that schools may only ask that parents give written consent that their child will be going on an excursion.

An indemnity form purports to indemnify a school against legal action that may arise as a result of a school activity.

Basic education department spokespers­on Elijah Mhlanga said: “The national department provides regulation­s that provinces should apply and adhere to and [they] are not expected to deviate from these regulation­s.”

He said the use of indemnity forms was a general practice but these forms were not a substitute for a reasonable expectatio­n of due care and responsibi­lity.

“As a department, we do not recognise indemnity forms. Instead, we expect schools to ask parents to give consent for their children to participat­e in excursions.

“A large majority of public schools do not insist on indemnity forms. Instead, they assume responsibi­lity for the safety, care and protection of the learners, even when they are undertakin­g school excursions.”

Gauteng’s regulation­s state that government schools must take reasonable measures to ensure the safety of pupils on tours. Education MEC Panyaza Lesufi said this week water-related trips and activities must be approved by the provincial head office.

According to the Western Cape’s guidelines, a teacher with some qualificat­ion or training in cardio-pulmonary resuscitat­ion and emergency care has to accompany pupils on trips that involve swimming and water-based activities.

This accident has been a very tragic wake-up call Anthea Cereseto

Governing Body Foundation CEO

Ultimately, a school’s principal and teachers are responsibl­e for the safety of pupils.

The Federation of Governing Bodies of South African Schools is developing a check list for schools to ensure they comply with safety regulation­s.

The Governing Body Foundation, which represents 650 school governing bodies, said it will be asking its members to review their excursion policy.

CEO Anthea Cereseto said: “This accident has been a very tragic wake-up call for every school and the opportunit­y must be taken to learn from it.”

The Parktown Boys’ governing body is a member of the foundation.

Matakanye Matakanye, general secretary of the National Associatio­n of School Governing Bodies, said it will be asking members to tighten up their schools’ safety policy, as not all have one.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa