Sunday Times

‘We need level 2, fast’

Business groups urge government to limit economic disaster by quickly easing rules

- By HILARY JOFFE

● SA’s new private-sector umbrella group formed to fight Covid-19 has been in daily talks with the government over reopening the economy and is urging it to move quickly to lockdown level 2.

Business for SA (B4SA) is proposing that companies, in partnershi­p with labour, can take charge of implementi­ng stringent health and safety controls and monitoring in the workplace to ensure the spread of the virus is controlled.

It has told the government that the current approach is economical­ly impractica­l and hard to regulate, and that this could have dire socioecono­mic and health consequenc­es.

This comes as April data start to show the devastatin­g impact of the first full month of the lockdown, during which many sectors of the economy ground to a halt, a growing number of jobs and businesses teetered on the brink and tax collection­s plummeted.

In a media briefing this week B4SA — which has brought organised business bodies together to work with the government to tackle the crisis — urged the cabinet to accelerate the risk-adjusted easing of the lockdown.

It said this “would enable a successful return to work while saving lives and livelihood­s and reinvigora­ting full economic activity in a co-ordinated and integrated way”.

B4SA’s modelling indicates that the move to level 4 will not materially improve economic outcomes because even in the bestcase scenario the proportion of the workforce returning to work will no more than double from the 27% active under level 5.

And if level 4 continued for a month, with a gradual move to lower levels, the economy would contract 14.5% in 2020.

However, a quick move to level 2 would reduce the contractio­n to 10% and cut the number of formal sector jobs at risk from 2million to below half that number. At level 2, 97% of the workforce would be allowed to work.

The faster trajectory, which B4SA said could be achieved if business and the government worked together to implement workplace safety practices to minimise transmissi­on, would reduce the budget deficit to 10%. The deficit is projected at 16% if level 4 is prolonged.

SA Revenue Service commission­er Edward Kieswetter this week said government revenue could fall R285bn short of budget targets this year. April’s figures showed yearon-year drops of 55% for corporate taxes, nearly 20% for import tax, 5.2% for PAYE and 4.3% for domestic VAT.

B4SA’s modelling, which found that in a worst-case scenario the economy could contract 17% despite the government’s stimulus package, reflects similar figures to those in a Treasury study by UNU-Wider, which found the economy could contract 16% in a “long” shutdown scenario.

Where the government’s approach is essentiall­y to ban all economic activity except that which is specifical­ly exempted, business organisati­ons and others have argued for an approach in which any activity is permitted, with strict safety controls, unless it is too high-risk in terms of disease transmissi­on.

That would still keep sectors such as tourism, sit-down restaurant­s and many personal services closed but would allow much of the economy to reopen.

The frequent and sometimes heated meetings between ministers and business representa­tives have served to clarify interpreta­tion of some of the level 4 regulation­s, with business encouraged by the government’s positive response to suggestion­s such as opening up e-commerce.

In this way 4-million more people would be able to work

Neva Makgetla

Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies economist

But there has been significan­t criticism and concern from many companies across all sectors about the applicatio­n of the regulation­s, which are highly bureaucrat­ic and complex and dislocate supply chains.

As a result some companies that theoretica­lly could restart under level 4 have been unable to do so, while some that should still be closed are open.

At the same time there are growing concerns that the shutdown, which has seen large numbers of workers lose income and jobs, will result in people dying from malnutriti­on and will generally reduce life expectancy for many South Africans. It is seen as potentiall­y hindering the treatment of other diseases, such as HIV and diabetes.

Many businesses are likely to go under, if they haven’t done so already — in one survey, 54% of businesses reported they could not survive even three months without revenue.

Neva Makgetla, an economist at the nonprofit group Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies, said in a briefing hosted by the Centre for Developmen­t & Enterprise on Friday the countries that have successful­ly opened up their economies from lockdown — such as South Korea and New Zealand — have distinguis­hed between industries based on the extent of public interactio­n, whereas in SA they have been categorise­d as they are in official government statistics.

She urged that all nonpublic-facing activities be allowed to reopen if they could observe existing health and safety rules and transport risks could be addressed.

“Being at work should not be such a big risk unless there is contact,” she said. “If the economy were to open up in this way 4-million more people would be able to work — so 75% of the workforce would be back at work, including working from home.”

 ??  ?? Tax commission­er Edward Kieswetter, left, and the minister of trade & industry, Ebrahim Patel.
Tax commission­er Edward Kieswetter, left, and the minister of trade & industry, Ebrahim Patel.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa