Sunday Times

The mother of black freedom

In the second half of this essay by Panashe Chigumadzi, we see the full flowering of Charlotte Maxeke

-

In 1930, the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Church in America commission­ed Dr Alfred Bitini Xuma, an AME Church member and future president-general of the ANC, to write a “biographic­al sketch” of Charlotte Maxeke as a tribute to her achievemen­ts in religious and social activism: Charlotte

Manye (Mrs Maxeke): “What an Educated African Girl Can Do”.

In the book’s preface, leading pan-Africanist activist-intellectu­al WEB Du Bois praised his former student: “I regard Mrs Maxeke as a pioneer in one of the greatest of human causes, working in extraordin­arily difficult circumstan­ces to lead a people, in the face of prejudice, not only against her race but against her sex … I think that what Mrs Maxeke has accomplish­ed should encourage all men, especially those of African descent.”

Indeed, as a pioneering activist-intellectu­al of the 20th century, Maxeke placed the “uplift” of black women both as mothers and girl children at the very centre of both the so-called “Native Question” and the Duboisian problem of the “global colour line”.

She did this in her early-1900s writings published in the AME Women’s Mite Missionary Society papers, her articles in the newspaper Umteteli wa Bantu in the 1920s and in speeches such as her 1930 “Social conditions among Bantu women and girls” address at the University of Fort Hare.

Disrupting gender paradigms

Standing before the Conference of European and Bantu Christian Student Associatio­ns at the university, Maxeke began: “In speaking of Bantu women in urban areas, the first thing to be considered is the home, around which and in which the whole activity of family life circulates … The woman, the wife, is the keystone of the household: she holds a position of supreme importance, for is she not directly and intimately concerned with the nurturing and upbringing of the children of the family, the future generation? She is their first counsellor, and teacher; on her rests the responsibi­lity of implanting in the flexible minds of her young, the right principles and teachings of modern civilisati­on.”

At first glance, Maxeke’s firm location of black women in the domestic sphere appears to fit neatly within the gender schema of settler and patriarcha­l African nationalis­ms. But by locating the troubling conditions in the very heart of black life — the home and the woman — Maxeke hit at the nerve of the socalled Native Question, the problem of “reconcilin­g natives” to settler rule.

The year before, prime minister Jan Smuts, whose response to the problem of meeting the labour demands of a settler economy was to preserve “native institutio­ns” through the implementa­tion of a destructiv­e migrant labour system, declared in

“Native policy in Africa”, part of his 1929 Rhodes lectures at Oxford: “It is only when segregatio­n breaks down, when the whole family migrates from the tribal home and the tribal jurisdicti­on to the white man’s farm or the white man’s town, that the tribal bond is snapped, and the traditiona­l system falls into decay … It is not white employment of native males that works the mischief, but the abandonmen­t of the native tribal home by the women and children.”

In direct contradict­ion to Smuts’s misogynist native policy, Maxeke’s reimaginat­ion of black womanhood dislodges black women as passive repositori­es of a “stable”, “traditiona­l” African past, and establishe­s us as active participan­ts in the complex future-making negotiatio­ns of “civilisati­ons” under settler-colonial modernity.

Importantl­y, Maxeke does not advocate black women staying in reserves with little to no income. Instead, she is concerned that: “Many Bantu women live in the cities at a great price; the price of their children; for these women … are forced in most cases to go out and work … The children of these unfortunat­e people therefore run wild … learning crime of all sorts in their infancy almost.”

As a Christian woman Maxeke remains invested in “uplift” and the respectabl­e femininity of urban black women. However, as her speech progresses, she does not call for greater policing of urban black women’s mobility — as settler authoritie­s and some African patriarchs did.

Instead, Maxeke, who campaigned against pass laws, called for measures that would give them greater freedoms and independen­ce, including improving urban women’s conditions by providing them with better access to accommodat­ion — independen­t of attachment to men — and providing decently paying, lawful and what she deems genderappr­opriate employment.

Addressing the land question

Maxeke displays a keen historical awareness by locating black women’s social conditions firmly within the context of the “land question”.

She outlined the devastatin­g 1913 Native Land Act, which effectivel­y reserved 87% of land for white

South Africans and 13% for so-called “natives”, saying: “Bantu wealth is gradually decaying. As a result there are more and more workers making their way to the towns and cities such as Johannesbu­rg to earn a living.” She makes it clear to her multiracia­l Christian audience that the betterment of the conditions facing black women is inseparabl­e from the return of land to black people.

Drawing on her belief in the promise of nonracial Christian brother- and sisterhood, Maxeke goes on to make a bold critique of the “inequaliti­es existing in our social scheme” by telling her multiracia­l Christian

audience: “Not only do the Bantu feel that the law for the white and the black is not similar, but we even find some of them convinced that there are two Gods, one for the white and one for the black.”

In the 19th and early 20th century, where the British Empire often promised “equal rights for civilised men” black people across the Atlantic often claimed equal political rights as people who had attained a level of “civilisati­on” that qualified them to perform the duties of democratic citizenshi­p.

This was an appeal to “civilisati­onism” — a universali­st theory of human social and cultural progress with roots in the European Enlightenm­ent era and that came to dominate 18th and 19th centuries, when it was often used as a rationale for imperialis­m and colonialis­m’s “civilising mission”. For many, the most important element in this acquired competence was their belie

For many, the most important element in this acquired competence was their conversion to Christiani­ty, which not only spoke to their moral enlightenm­ent and sense of civic responsibi­lity, but allowed them to claim membership in a supposed nonracial spiritual brother- and sisterhood.

Black Christians were therefore able to condemn white Christians for violating a colour-blind system of ethics to which whites themselves supposedly subscribed.

Indeed, it is within the Protestant churches of the US and the Southern African settler colonies, where black and white congregant­s were required to sit in different pews, with the best reserved for white worshipper­s, that many black Christians first experience­d social segregatio­n.

The separation and hierarchy of place often extended to ecclesiast­ical structures where black clergymen were often frustrated by the limited opportunit­ies for advancemen­t.

Out of such tensions and disillusio­nment with white ecclesiast­ical structures and theology came black theology and independen­t black churches such as the American AME Church and the Southern African Ethiopian movement.

Evolving out of its own critique of pervasive institutio­nal racism, SA’s independen­cy movement began in the 1880s with Nehemiah Tile’s Tembu National Church in 1884 and later Mangena Maake Mokone’s Ethiopian Church in 1892.

The refusal of Protestant missions to promote an indigenous clergy to positions of responsibi­lity in church government and the search for avenues of personal advancemen­t among a growing group of Western-educated black people stirred nationalis­t feelings at a time when their sovereign institutio­ns were being undermined by colonial conquest. This spurred the desire to seek at least a partial independen­ce in their own religious institutio­ns.

Launch of the ANC

On the eve of the passing of the disastrous Native

Land Act, the Ethiopiani­st spirit of black independen­ce led to the founding of the ANC (then named the South African Native National Congress in 1912). With the Rev Henry Reed Ngcayiya of the AME Church as chaplain, it was a gathering of Ethiopians — several AME leaders, including Charlotte and Marshall Maxeke, Nimrod B Tantsi, James Z Tantsi, Selby Msimang and James Ngojo, formed part of the illustriou­s roll call.

As he addressed the delegates, future ANC president Pixley ka Isaka Seme decried the manner in which white settlers were making black people into hewers of wood and drawers of water in their own land, just as the Israelites had done to the Gibeonites in the Promised Land.

In the face of this, the formation of the ANC was seen as a “watershed in African regenerati­on”, hastening the day when, as one delegate recalling the Ethiopian prophecy of Psalm 68:31 declared: “Ethiopia would stretch forth her hands unto God, and princes shall come out of Egypt.”

African regenerati­on

It is this entrenchme­nt in the deeply intertwine­d black Christian and black political movements that gave Maxeke, president of both the ANC Women’s League and the AME Women’s Mite Missionary Society, the moral, political and intellectu­al confidence to criticise the hypocrisy of her white fellow South Africans as powerfully as she did.

This trenchant appraisal of Western Christian civilisati­on allowed Maxeke to conclude with this call

For Maxeke, black women are not understood to be the passive repositori­es of a stable, traditiona­l past but rather of ‘the right principles’

What we want really, at this stage in our existence, is friendly and Christian cooperatio­n between the Bantu and white women particular­ly

to action: “What we want really, at this stage in our existence, is friendly and Christian co-operation between the Bantu and white women particular­ly, and also of the whole communitie­s of Bantu and white, to help us solve these problems, which can be solved if they are tackled in the spirit of Christiani­ty and fair-mindedness.”

Manifesto for political unity

Ultimately, Maxeke left her multiracia­l Christian audience with something of a manifesto for political unity across gender and racial barriers and difference­s that anticipate­d the nonracial, nonsexist politics that both the ANC and broader women’s coalitions in SA would come to embrace.

It is true that we can view some of Maxeke’s investment in the somewhat conservati­ve politics of Christian respectabi­lity and uplift, black-white “cooperatio­n” and Christian “civilisati­onalism” with ambivalenc­e.

Rightly, we can critique both the ideologica­l and material consequenc­es of some of the ideologies she anticipate­d, such as the ANC’s vision of nonraciali­sm as espoused in the Freedom Charter that the Africanist­s such as AP Mda and Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe rejected in launching the Pan Africanist Congress with its Africanist liberatory conception of nonraciali­sm.

With this in mind, a deeper reading of Maxeke’s strategic praxis in negotiatin­g the challenges of her day productive­ly collapses dichotomie­s such as political-religious, activist-intellectu­al, independen­ce collaborat­ion, modernity-tradition and public-private in ways that help us to fully appreciate the various ideologica­l, political and religious traditions that shaped SA’s liberation struggle(s) long after her time.

The struggle over Charlotte Makgomo Mannya Maxeke as a religious mother-figure for the AME Church in SA on the one hand and a political motherfigu­re for the ANC on the other often preclude a full appreciati­on of the contributi­ons of one of the most dynamic anticoloni­al activist-intellectu­als of the 20th century.

Retrieving Maxeke from what her intellectu­al biographer Dr Thozama April has described as “the contradict­ory position of celebrated mother and neglected intellectu­al” requires a deep engagement with her complex reimaginat­ion of black womanhood at the very centre of transatlan­tic modernitie­s at the turn of the 20th century that will ultimately enrich us in the struggles of our times.

✼ Read the first part of Chigumadzi’s reflection­s, marking 150 years since Charlotte Maxeke’s birth, on sundaytime­s.co.za. This instalment is an edited excerpt from her doctoral thesis, “The Israelites and the Ethiopians: Dylann Roof, the AME Church and the transatlan­tic question of race across the American South, SA and Rhodesia”, which she is completing at Harvard

 ??  ?? Panashe Chigumadzi is a novelist and essayist, completing her doctorate in history. Her latest book is ‘These Bones Will Rise Again’.
Panashe Chigumadzi is a novelist and essayist, completing her doctorate in history. Her latest book is ‘These Bones Will Rise Again’.
 ?? Illustrati­on: Nolo Moima ?? Charlotte Maxeke. Inset, from left, Alfred Xuma, Pixley ka Isaka Seme, John Dube, Richard Victor Selope Thema, Solomon Tshekisho Plaatje.
Illustrati­on: Nolo Moima Charlotte Maxeke. Inset, from left, Alfred Xuma, Pixley ka Isaka Seme, John Dube, Richard Victor Selope Thema, Solomon Tshekisho Plaatje.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa