Sunday Times

DURBAN’S DIY BRIDGE

Enterprisi­ng team of volunteers now in demand in other areas

- By NIVASHNI NAIR

● A group of Durban volunteers who repaired a flood-damaged bridge and access road with donated funds and machinery have been inundated with requests for help by other frustrated communitie­s.

The Pompene River bridge team, consisting of 10 community activists, repaired the bridge linking Shallcross and Blundell Road after it was hit by debris and the resulting blockage diverted the floodwater­s to the side, washing away part of the road and a section of the bridge.

The team took on the task with R50,000 and the sponsored use of R12m worth of constructi­on equipment.

Now other Durban residents grounded by the loss of bridges in the deadly floods last month are turning to the group for advice and help.

“We have been asked to repair the Hans Dettman, La Mercy and Yellowwood Park bridges. We’re doing due diligence first,” said Marcus Richards, the team’s spokespers­on.

La Mercy Civic and Ratepayers Associatio­n vice-chair Tashya Giyapersad said the associatio­n had approached the team to get clarity on how they worked with the local authoritie­s.

“At present, we have a temporary solution but we have no help whatsoever,” Giyapersad said. “The bridge in our area is on a provincial road so we have been told by the South African National Roads Agency and the provincial transport department that it will take at least six months to repair. We have only one way in and out of our area without this bridge being fixed,” she added.

“We are in consultati­on with the community safety and liaison MEC but we needed to know from Shallcross residents how they went about getting authoritie­s on board to help with the temporary fix.”

The Pompene River bridge team’s efforts earned them applause from the eThekwini municipali­ty for showing “civic pride” by taking on the project.

The municipali­ty later said it was “a collaborat­ive effort” under the “expertise, advice and supervisio­n” of its engineerin­g unit and that it had initiated the repair.

But Richards questioned the municipali­ty’s statement. “It’s partially correct. We were asked to initially remove debris, and were given not so firm assurances of time frames to sort out repairs. Yes, it was a joint venture but all work was done by us.”

eThekwini municipali­ty spokespers­on Msawakhe Mayisela said the residents offered to help rebuild the washed-away portions of the road embankment­s leading to the culvert and they were asked to initially assist with the removal of debris.

“The residents employed the use of an excavator to remove the debris while the engineerin­g unit started to stockpile backfill material on site. The residents also then provided a truck and a roller, while the unit provided a front-end loader for rebuilding the embankment. Following the expertise, advice and supervisio­n by the engineerin­g unit, the road embankment­s on the approaches to the culvert were quickly re-establishe­d through mass backfillin­g and compaction.”

Mayisela said the road was deemed suitable to reopen as a temporary gravel road, but the project was not yet complete.

“There still remain the tasks of providing a suitable base and asphalt wearing course, road markings, guardrails, drainage, removal of the balance of the debris from the culverts, further backfillin­g, the formation of a berm to properly divert water to the culverts, and the removal of the debris from the riverbed to prevent future blockage and damage here,” he said.

Richards said the municipali­ty’s road department and engineerin­g unit carried out daily site visits. He emphasised that the actual bridge was intact and certified structural­ly stable by the municipali­ty before the team carried out the work.

“We built the approaches to the actual bridge in five days, not the concrete bridge. The work took us 12 days,” he said.

When residents Kader Goolam and Vernon Kisten suggested that they take on the project, the activists canvassed businesses for donations. About R50,000 was raised and the use of R12-million worth of constructi­on equipment was sponsored for the project.

By the third day, after an assessment of the damaged bridge, 20 casual workers were hired and the team was on the ground to clear the debris.

The bridge was officially reopened a week ago.

“I wish I could explain how we felt when the first car crossed the bridge. People were actually crying. As a group of people, we did this together and on our own. It felt good to see how appreciati­ve residents are,” Richards said.

Retired civil engineerin­g technician Roderick Schultz said the residents cleaned debris blocking the culverts and reinstated the washed away bridge’s approach, earth fills and road surface.

“It is not difficult to repair a river crossing if the concrete structure is still in place and alternativ­e access is available to bring in plant, equipment and materials. It is a matter of cleaning up and importing fill material, placing, and compacting layers in place. However, for an unskilled community to achieve what they did with limited resources was admirable,” he said.

 ?? Picture: Sandile Ndlovu ?? Rickesh Maharaj, Vivek Singh, Anash Singh, Anil Singh and Marcus Richards stand on the Blundell Road bridge, which they repaired following the floods.
Picture: Sandile Ndlovu Rickesh Maharaj, Vivek Singh, Anash Singh, Anil Singh and Marcus Richards stand on the Blundell Road bridge, which they repaired following the floods.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa