Questions galore as world’s top ad boss exits

● Angry WPP shareholders rebelled on Wednesday at an annual meeting dominated by differences over the departure of the advertising firm’s former CEO Martin Sorrell.

The most famous advertising executive in the world quit the marketing giant he built from scratch in April following an allegation of personal misconduct, prompting concerns among some investors over the handling of his departure.

This was reflected in voting at the AGM, where nearly 30% of WPP shareholders opposed its executive pay proposal.

This included share awards to Sorrell which could be worth £20-million, although they are expected to be well below that due to WPP’s recent underperformance.

Almost 17% of investors also declined to back the re-election of its chairman Roberto Quarta, under whose watch Sorrell left with the share awards and without a noncompete clause.

The departure of one of Britain’s bestknown businessmen rekindled arguments that have long dogged WPP meetings — that it paid him too much and did not prepare for his succession.

Sorrell earned around £200-million in the last five years alone. In 2016, a third of WPP’s investors refused to back his £70-million pay package.

Many questions

Described by one private investor as the “elephant in the room”, Sorrell dominated the debate, with investors asking why he had left, why the company had not prepared for his departure and why he had been allowed to keep his share awards.

“What will the strategy be because Martin was so key to this, and he’s no longer here?” another private investor asked, while a third questioned why the chairman had not launched the meeting with a tribute to WPP’s founder.

Quarta told reporters after the hour-long meeting that he had acknowledged Sorrell on his departure and “didn’t think it was necessary” to do so again.

“No one man is the company,” he added. The nature of the complaint against Sorrell has not been disclosed. He has denied any wrongdoing, and the chairman said there was nothing more he could say on the matter.

‘Robust response’

“I know that questions remain, but there is simply nothing further we can legally disclose,” Quarta told investors.

Quarta defended the company’s response to the allegation, saying it was robust from a governance and legal perspective.

While he accepted criticism over future share awards, he noted that these pre-dated the current board and said no one had expected Sorrell to leave so quickly and that his priority after joining in 2015 had been to renegotiate Sorrell’s pay before seeking to tie him in to a more typical contract.

“It was a timing issue,” he said.

Whoever takes over WPP faces an uphill task after the group started losing ground to rivals.

It delivered its worst annual sales performance since the financial crisis in 2017 after being squeezed by tech giants Facebook and Google, consultants Accenture and the bigspending groups like Unilever, which are cutting costs.

Quarta told reporters there was no link between the group’s faltering performance and the sudden departure of Sorrell, and said the hunt for a new CEO was well advanced.

A leading candidate to take over the top job is Mark Read, a former board member and digital boss who has been appointed joint chief operating officer.

Alongside fellow operating officer Andrew Scott, he has embarked on a review on the group and is likely to at least dispose of minority tech stakes in a bid to lower debt.

“I think the business can succeed without him [Sorrell],” said Read, a more media-shy exec than his former boss, while praising the role Sorrell had played.

“People inside the company have every confidence that we can do that. We need to find a new beating heart for the group.”

In a trading update, WPP said its key measurement of four-month net sales was marginally up, an improvement on the 0.1% fall in net sales in the first quarter.

Liberum analysts said the improvement should give investors confidence that WPP can meet its guidance for flat sales and margins this year.

“We’ve got work to do but I don’t see why we can’t return the business to growth,” Read said.

“Last year we underperformed our rivals, it is clear we need to do better.”