Sunday Tribune

Is EU’s tackling of Google monopoly a toothless endeavour?

- Aoife White Brussels

Break up Google? It’s unlikely to happen, no matter what 384 European Union lawmakers say, according to ministers and officials.

Members of the EU parliament in Strasbourg, France voted 384-174 for the European Commission – which is investigat­ing Google for possible antitrust violations – to consider “unbundling search engines from other commercial services”. The motion, which isn’t binding, didn’t mention Google by name.

Guenther Oettinger, the EU’s digital economy commission­er, said he didn’t think breaking up Google “is what we can expect” after the vote to bolster search engine competitio­n.

Google, which has a market share of more than 90 percent for internet search in some European countries, faces an assault on its business from across the bloc. It was criticised by privacy regulators this week, targeted by German politician­s who urged the EU to push on with the antitrust probe and faces a possible levy on internet copyright, adding to a Spanish law that allows publishers to charge for web content.

The vote “doesn’t have any legal value” Axelle Lemaire, France’s secretary of state for digital affairs, told reporters in Brussels. It “simply expresses the wish of the newly elected European parliament­arians and does this in a strong manner”.

Al Verney, a spokesman for Google in Brussels, declined to comment on the vote.

Members of the European assembly cheered the result, which adds urgency to a antitrust probe that is two days short of its fourth birthday. A planned settlement to settle the case was delayed by negative feedback from rivals. Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s antitrust chief who took office on November 1, said earlier this month she would decide where the probe goes after she’s spoken to companies affected by Google’s behaviour.

“European enterprise­s are losing revenues and people are getting fired,” Ramon Tremosa, a member of the EU parliament from Spain’s Catalonia region, said. “European consumers are not having the most pertinent choice, because of Google’s preferenti­al treatment to its own services.”

The commission will respond to the parliament’s resolution, said Ricardo Cardoso, its competitio­n spokesman. Vestager needs “some time to form her view and decide on next steps” in the Google case.

He said “it is very important that the applicatio­n of competitio­n law in individual cases remains independen­t from politics and that antitrust procedures are not put into question”. Regulators must “respect the rights of all the parties involved” and “remain impartial and fair”.

The parliament’s pro-business liberal group, which said it voted against splitting the company, said the assembly “should not be engaging in anti-Google resolution­s inspired by a heavy lobby of Google competitor­s”, according to a statement.

The parliament’s plans have angered the US government and a US-based industry group, which criticised attempts to influence the EU’s four-year long antitrust investigat­ion. The Computer and Communicat­ions Industry Associatio­n said the vote for “an extreme and unworkable solution” was “clearly designed to increase the pressure on Commission­er Vestager”.

Yesterday’s vote is another example of the parliament flexing its muscles to rein in business. The assembly managed to enforce curbs on banker bonuses into EU legislatio­n. – Bloomberg.

 ?? PHOTO: BLOOMBERG ?? Pedestrian­s walk past a Google signage in front of the company's headquarte­rs in Mountain View, California, US. On September 27, 2013, Google celebrated its 15th anniversar­y as the company reached $290 billion market value.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG Pedestrian­s walk past a Google signage in front of the company's headquarte­rs in Mountain View, California, US. On September 27, 2013, Google celebrated its 15th anniversar­y as the company reached $290 billion market value.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa