Sunday Tribune

Gordhan on the ropes

Shivambu says his party will ensure that public protector’s remedial steps are implemente­d

- KARABO NGOEPE

PUBLIC Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has laid down the law to President Cyril Ramaphosa, instructin­g him to take action against embattled Public Enterprise­s Minister Pravin Gordhan for violating the Constituti­on and deliberate­ly misleading Parliament about the Sars rogue unit and his meeting with a member of the Gupta family.

In her report released on Friday, Mkhwebane found Gordhan guilty of improper conduct, abuse of power and maladminis­tration for approving the establishm­ent of an illegal spy unit during his tenure as Sars commission­er between 1998 and 2009.

She also found Gordhan guilty of breaching the executive code of ethics by deliberate­ly misleading Parliament when he failed to disclose that he had met Ajay Gupta during his term in office. Gordhan has been critical of the Gupta family in recent years, labelling those who met them as enablers of state capture.

In her report, Mkhwebane said the establishm­ent of the spy unit “with the approval of Mr Gordhan” as Sars commission­er breached section 209 of the Constituti­on in terms of which “only the President may establish such covert informatio­n gathering unit”.

“Even if the unit was never called the rogue unit at SARS, the operations and functions of the CBCU, a unit that existed, were similar. The conduct of Mr Gordhan as referred to in the establishm­ent of the intelligen­ce unit at SARS is improper and in violation of Section 209 of the Constituti­on and therefore amounts to maladminis­tration as envisaged in Section 182 (1) of the Constituti­on and abuse of power as envisaged in Section 6 (4) (ii) of the Public Protector Act,” said Mkhwebane.

“The Sikhakhane report confirms that Gordhan played a role in the recruitmen­t of Van Loggerenbe­rg. I have further noted that, prior to Gordhan’s submission of a memorandum to the then Minister of Finance Trevor Manuel, Pillay had already began recruiting members to partake in operations of surveillan­ce.”

She ordered Ramaphosa “to take note of the findings in the report insofar as they related to the erstwhile Minister of Finance Mr Gordhan, and to take appropriat­e disciplina­ry action against him within 30 days of issuing of this report”.

This comes more than a month after Ramaphosa ignored Mkhwebane’s remedial action against Gordhan in the matter about his irregular approval of former Sars deputy commission­er Ivan Pillay’s early pension.

Mkhwebane further ordered State Security Minister Ayanda Dlodlo, Police Commission­er General Khehla Sitole, National Assembly Speaker Thandi Modise and National Director of Public Prosecutio­ns Shamila Batohi to implement their share of remedial steps against Gordhan. However, none of them was willing to comment on the report when contacted yesterday.

Ramaphosa spokespers­on, Khusela Diko, said the president has not yet received it. “We are therefore not in a position to comment on the matter until he has had an opportunit­y to apply his mind to it,” she said.

Modise said: “I don’t have such a report on my desk and therefore I can’t comment. If she sent it then she sent it somewhere else, but I don’t have it.”

Sitole’s spokespers­on, Brigadier Vishnu Naidoo, declined to comment on the matter and referred Sunday Independen­t to Hawks spokespers­on Brigadier Hangwani Mulaudzi who said they would await an instructio­n from Sitole on the way forward.

However, that instructio­n might result in the opening of old wounds. A source within the elite crime fighting unit said criminal investigat­ions would resuscitat­e former Hawks boss Berning Ntlemeza’s probe. He sent Gordhan 27 questions in 2016 related to the establishm­ent of the rogue unit.

“The initial investigat­ion was shelved after it was concluded. It now means it will have to be reopened,” said the source.

Batohi’s spokespers­on, Bulelwa Makeke, said “we will go through the report and see how it affects the NPA and take it from there.’’

The rogue unit was establishe­d in February 2007 by Pillay who was at the time Sars risk and enforcemen­t executive.

However, it was run by various managers who included at times Andries Janse van Rensburg, as well as Johann van Loggerenbe­rg.

The spy unit was officially set up to penetrate organised crime syndicates engaged in the smuggling of cigarettes, drugs and rhino horns.

However, it wreaked havoc in the run up to the ANC Polokwane conference when it placed prominent politician­s under illegal surveillan­ce, intercepte­d their calls and emails, and even bugged 12 offices of the National Prosecutin­g Authority (NPA) used by senior officials including then NDPP head Vusi Pikoli.

It used specialise­d equipment such as CCTV cameras, binoculars, needle pins and portal radios procured at a cost of R546 million, according to its own records and affidavits by former members such as Helgard Lombard.

Politician­s targeted included former president Jacob Zuma, Tokyo Sexwale and then ANC Youth League leaders Fikile Mbalula and Julius Malema.

Mkhwebane’s report said: “There is further evidence at my disposal of the unauthoris­ed intercepti­on of private communicat­ions of prominent members of society as well as surveillan­ce by the intelligen­ce unit of SARS for unknown reasons and/or purposes.”

Both Gordhan and Pillay have questioned Mkhwebane’s report, decried her failure to inform them about plans to release the findings and threatened an urgent review applicatio­n.

“It is apparent that the public protector continues to get the facts wrong, get the law wrong and is demonstrab­ly biased. The Constituti­on, in Section 181, envisages the Office of the Public Protector to be independen­t, impartial, dignified and effective. To date, in this matter, it has failed in all four respects,” Gordhan said.

Pillay, through his lawyers Werkmans Attorneys, denied any wrong-doing.

EFF deputy president Floyd Shivambu, one of the complainan­ts in the Gordhan matter, said his party would ensure all remedial actions are implemente­d, “especially for the SAPS to take action”.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa