Sunday Tribune

Brave enough to talk about corruption

- MELUSI NCALA

I OFTEN puzzle over the hesitant behaviour of people around me when they discuss the topic of land dispossess­ion and the displaceme­nt of families and communitie­s.

It is as though there is a collective dispositio­n of awkwardnes­s and clumsiness. Land and related issues are described as “touchy” or there is a subtle othering of those who are adversely affected as “being emotional”. We all should be familiar with these complicati­ng tactics because they are often used against daring, strong and assertive women who articulate and confront matters that societies are otherwise fearful or reluctant to address.

Neverthele­ss, it is these euphemisms and others that most of us resort to when we should be using more appropriat­e, more honest descriptor­s such as “painful”, “angry” and “problemati­c”

to talk about land corruption – the abuse of entrusted power for private gain in the administra­tion and management of land governance – and the ensuing displaceme­nt and dispossess­ion. That is how injustice must be rationalis­ed. How else do we expect to begin to right a wrong marked by persecutio­n, violence and corruption?

My team and I recently visited communitie­s in ethekwini, Kwazulunat­al, as part of Corruption Watch’s involvemen­t in the Land Corruption in Africa project by Transparen­cy Internatio­nal. People voiced their frustratio­ns at being left landless, homeless and exposed to polluted environmen­ts. They have been impoverish­ed, abused and neglected by elected and employed government officials, traditiona­l leaders, and corporatio­ns.

They are disillusio­ned and angry.

These are some of the dire consequenc­es of land corruption. We heard frequently that to obtain a government-sponsored house or a piece of land from a tribal authority, a person is supposed to pay a bribe. But even that might be a temporary arrangemen­t; the person could be removed under dubious circumstan­ces like the decision to rezone an area or allegation­s of bad behaviour.

Exacerbati­ng these cruel circumstan­ces, sinister political dealings enable businesses to acquire large portions of land and invade residentia­l areas for profit at the expense of people’s peace, the sanctity of their lives, and their freedom. The community members’ discussion­s were punctuated with bitter comments of “no one cares” and “businesses do what they like because they are protected by politician­s”.

Corruption Watch has more than 700 cases of corruption involving land and related issues. Some are about sextortion. Others describe officials who give preferenti­al treatment to friends and family or, soliciting bribes from applicants, who rent out or sell houses meant for poor and working-class people. These cases are among 20% of our reports alleging irregulari­ties in awarding public housing.

Furthermor­e, there are claims of embezzleme­nt of funds and theft of resources; 25% of corruption cases give an account of officials working alongside businesses to siphon public money intended for land developmen­t. All of these purported acts of corruption and criminalit­y go hand-in-hand with over 11% of reports of bribery and 9% of reports of procuremen­t irregulari­ties.

It is a sad state of affairs, but as much as there are people who are increasing­ly feeling despondent because of the status quo, there are those ready to soldier on and to live to fight another day. These are the people who acknowledg­e that the land question is one that is historical­ly and principall­y steeped in corruption, both morally and legally.

These people are unwilling to yield to the might of the corrupt. Their will to express their hurt and to confidentl­y blow the whistle on corruption is a testament to their unwavering spirit.

● Corruption Watch will tomorrow launch the Land Corruption in Africa report, unearthing corruption in the land sector, at St Paul’s Church, Durban.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa