Sunday World (South Africa)

Stop the interferen­ce of bureaucrat­s

-

Dear Commission­er,

NEASA is disappoint­ed at the blatant back-door legislatio­n attempted to be forced through by the Department of Employment and Labour and the Compensati­on Fund.

This implementa­tion of detrimenta­l rules cannot be left unchalleng­ed.

After publicatio­n of the first draft bill on the amendment of the Compensati­on for Occupation­al Injuries and Diseases Act, NEASA and other role players vehemently opposed the “prohibitio­n of cessions” as introduced by section 43(4) of the bill.

We were relieved when the portfolio committee on employment and labour removed section 43(4) of the COID Amendment Bill, which sought to prohibit medical service providers (MSPS) from ceding their claims for payment by the Compensati­on Fund to financial institutio­ns.

But since the Compensati­on Fund will no longer accept banking details and nominated bank accounts of agents and other representa­tives, other than MSPS or healthcare organisati­ons, these rules amount to the prohibitio­n of cessions.

Clearly, the rules are in direct contradict­ion to the COID Amendment Bill.

Bureaucrat­s at the fund, after being overruled by parliament, simply implemente­d their original wish of prohibitin­g cessions by virtue of these rules.

NEASA wishes to express its utmost disdain at the manner in which parliament’s decision was overruled by bureaucrat­s.

We therefore call on commission­er Vuyo Mafata to withdraw these rules.

G C Papenfus

National Employers Associatio­n of South Africa CEO

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa