Djokovic’s participation hangs in the balance
Just when the Novak Djokovic saga was coming to a close, here comes a bombshell. Australian Immigration Minister Alex Hawke exercised the nuclear option on Friday, cancelling the Serbian tennis star’s visa for the second time.
Djokovic’s legal team has sought a judicial review, and a federal court hearing is scheduled today, the day before the Australian Open begins.
Whatever the outcome, it’s difficult to disagree with Hawke’s decision since condoning Djokovic would encourage more people to land in Australia unvaccinated. And Canberra would be under fire for pandering to a prima donna if they turned away the unvaccinated.
Not just that. It would also convey the impression that the Covid rules in Australia can bend. That would be unfair to hundreds of thousands of Australians who suffered immensely under lockdowns and restrictions on interstate travel. At one point, thousands of citizens were unable to fly home.
Djokovic’s lawyers say that one of the reasons stated for the minister’s decision to cancel the visa is that the Serbian could “excite anti-vax sentiment”.
It is not clear if that will stand in a court but that’s something Australia would want to avoid, especially when there’s an Omicron surge. And vaccinations are reported to reduce the severity of Covid infections.
Come to think of it, all this drama was needless if Djokovic had adhered to the Covid rules in Australia. Instead, he chose to play by his rules.
He refused to be vaccinated and sought an exemption with a recent Covid infection, which was only revealed after he was denied entry by the Australian Border Force.
A procedural error gained him a reprieve from a judge only for the world to find out that Djokovic had been making several public appearances in Belgrade even after he suspected a coronavirus infection.
The visa cancellation means Djokovic is banned from Australia for three years: a visa cannot be granted to him for three years. That would be brutal.