IAAF are levelling playing fields

South Africa has so little to be proud of that it is quite natural for the Caster Semenya, controversy to raise the emotional levels. Our “Golden Girl” Semenya, pictured, is under threat. When emotions come into play, rational thought is obliterated.

This is the case with the IAAF’s new female eligibility rules. Firstly, there is no proof or evidence that Semenya has specifically been targeted. Pure speculation.

There are other athletes with the same problem. Even Paula Radcliffe, women’s marathon record holder, stated: “I think it has been made with the IAAF trying to make it fair for the majority.” I agree.

Secondly, the ruling is not a sudden thumbsuck but a “culmination of 15 years’ work, scientifically reviewed” (Sebastian Coe).

Professor Yoga CooPoo of the University of Johannesburg has found that athletes with hyperandrogenism do have an advantage over other athletes.

Professor Steve Cornelius’ resignation from the IAAF is a huge mistake, apart from his sanctimonious utterings. His input would have been far more decisive within the federation. He has now lost the advantage.

Again, an emotional decision that is fundamentally flawed. I don’t think his resignation will have any impact on the IAAF.

I do, however, agree that the ruling should cover both field and track athletes. I find it hard to believe that athletes who have an added advantage over their rivals can feel victimised.

An athlete who takes performance enhancers so as to have an advantage over his/her rivals is immediately banned.

Only when the playing fields are level will we be able to call Semenya our “Golden Girl” with conviction and pride. John

Send us your letter We publish letters that come with full name, address and telephone number even if you want to use a pseudonym. letters@ citizen.co.za, fax 010-492-5386 or PO Box 43069 Industria 2042