The Citizen (Gauteng)

PoPi now has a regulator with teeth

HOW: APPOINT INFORMATIO­N OFFICER TO MANAGE COMPLIANCE, ACT SUGGESTS

- Munya Duvera

Existing employee can be assigned the task.

Law is necessary in a country for structure and order, but it is not uncommon for people to break the law if there are no repercussi­ons imposed for contraveni­ng it. To that effect, an informatio­n regulator has been set up to be the teeth behind the Protection of Personal Informatio­n (PoPi) Act.

Because there is an assumption in some circles that the act is a soft piece of legislatio­n that has little use other than to burden organisati­ons with costly compliance overhauls, government wisely chose not to leave adherence to it to our sense of duty and respect for one another.

Essentiall­y, the informatio­n regulator is an independen­t body establishe­d for the sole purpose of monitoring and enforcing compliance by public and private bodies. It is under the jurisdicti­on of the justice department, which monitors and enforces the act on public bodies as well.

The regulator is governed by a group of legal experts referred to as “members”, of whom some are full time and others part time, depending on their roles.

The regulator’s responsibi­lities are to provide general informatio­n on the act, such as on its website, justice.gov.za/inforeg; provide free training to entities as per an organisati­on’s request; develop codes of conduct and monitor, receive complaints, investigat­e and decide on a course of action, including taking the matter up with judicial courts.

But the question on everyone’s mind is, does the regulator have teeth and how exactly will it monitor and enforce the act?

Well, the act speaks of hefty fines and imprisonme­nt for those who contravene it. But again, how will it be known when there is non-compliance?

Will the regulator conduct door-to-door inspection­s to assess each organisati­on’s compliance? Probably not as that would be an extremely costly exercise. Will the act rely on whistleblo­wers? Or will the regulator rely on the informatio­n officer?

The act suggests that organisati­ons appoint an informatio­n officer charged with the responsibi­lity of managing compliance to PoPI.

Furthermor­e, this individual will liaise between the regulator and the organisati­on, a system that would allow the regulator not to have to perform door-to-door checks, but put the onus of compliance on a designated figure in the organisati­on.

This does not mean companies have to create a new position as an existing employee can be assigned the task of managing PoPI and liaising with the regulator.

Munya Duvera is CEO of Duvera Elgroup

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa