The Citizen (Gauteng)

Legal Aid SA accused of intimidati­on to discourage demonstrat­ion

- Sipho Mabena

Legal Aid South Africa has been accused of using intimidati­on tactics to discourage workers, including lawyers and support staff, from taking part in today’s planned demonstrat­ions.

An internal memo – the contents of which workers believe are crafted to thwart support for the demonstrat­ion – sent to staff reminds workers intending to participat­e that their actions would not be protected by the Labour Relations Act but by the Regulation of Gatherings Act.

The memo, sent out this week by the human resources department, reminds workers that the agency did not agree with the demonstrat­ion at the Council for Conciliati­on, Mediation and Arbitratio­n (CCMA).

Since the demonstrat­ions will be taking place during working hours, the “no work, no pay” principle will be applied for a minimum of half a day to a full day for those participat­ing, the memo stated.

Michael Motaung, one of the agency’s lawyers at the forefront of the action, said they received calls from worried workers after the memo was sent out on Monday afternoon.

“We have had to meet workers and tell them there was nothing to worry about because this message is intended to sabotage the demonstrat­ions so that there is no support and, therefore, no impact,” he said.

As part of a build-up to a fullblown strike, which could, if not averted, bring the justice system across the country to a halt, workers will today hold demonstrat­ions at the public legal agency’s Braamfonte­in offices.

In the 2017-2018 financial year, Legal Aid SA handled 371 202 new criminal matters and 55 415 new civil matters.

Workers claim Legal Aid SA has failed to address their safety concerns, with people simply walking into their offices to attack them, despite, according to the Legal Aid SA’s annual report, the costs of security at the agency increasing from R2 144 152 in 2017 to R2 258 171 last year.

They are also aggrieved by a debilitati­ng workload which, they said, compromise­d quality at the expense of the accused, who depend on Legal Aid lawyers for justice.

Legal Aid SA chief operating officer Dr Jerry Makokoane denied that the memo was to intimidate, saying they were simply engaging staff to detail the regulation­s around the intended action to ensure compliance with the relevant laws.

“Employees also understand that their right to a peaceful demonstrat­ion is exercised in terms of section 17 of the constituti­on, enabled by the Regulation of Gatherings Act.

“The internal staff memo states that no intimidati­on, victimisat­ion or unfair discrimina­tion will be allowed on the part of any Legal Aid SA manager or employee [partaking or not partaking in the demonstrat­ion],” he said.

Makokoane said it was impractica­l to assume those participat­ing in a mass demonstrat­ion between the times they indicate will be in a position to return to their work stations or court, as they suggested.

“Again, while Legal Aid SA respects the constituti­onal right of employees to demonstrat­e, meeting our operationa­l requiremen­ts is of equal importance,” he said.

This message is intended to sabotage the demonstrat­ions so that there is no support and, therefore, no impact.

Michael Motaung Legal Aid lawyer

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa