The Citizen (Gauteng)

Safety of JZ, Cyril ‘put at risk by spy rookies’

- Brian Sokutu

The shambles in the management of the State Security Agency (SSA) exposed former president Jacob Zuma and then deputy Cyril Ramaphosa to a threat of insecurity, the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture heard yesterday.

In the Zuma era, there were irregularl­y recruited and poorly trained intelligen­ce operatives tasked with assessing presidenti­al safety at public events, taking over the role of experience­d functionar­ies.

The milking of state resources also saw novice recruits, who travelled extensivel­y wherever Zuma and Ramaphosa went, being paid R40 000 per month, according to testimony given by an unidentifi­ed witness “Mr Y”, whose evidence was supported by “Miss K” – another unidentifi­ed witness,

“The assessment of the presidenti­al security was weakened.

“Members of the directorat­e of special operations and co-workers who were irregularl­y recruited and trained by the [chief directorat­e for special operations], travelled extensivel­y, using valuable state resources without providing any intelligen­ce or informatio­n to the SSA in support of its authorised mandate.

“Project Veza found no discernibl­e benefits to the SSA or the nation through these intelligen­ce activities,” said Y.

The commission also heard how millions of rands were redirected from SSA’s legitimate operations to a project establishe­d “to guard” Zuma’s aircraft – leading to the agency incurring an

Novice recruits, who travelled extensivel­y wherever Zuma and Ramaphosa went, were paid R40 000 per month.

unplanned expenditur­e of R1.5 million a month.

The safety of Zuma’s presidenti­al aircraft took up 40% of the chief directorat­e for internal security’s (CDIS) budget of R48 million and R38 million in the 2015-16 and 2016-17 financial years, respective­ly.

“This means almost 40% of the chief directorat­e for internal security’s budget was redirected from other operationa­l activities to meet the requiremen­ts of this project for the alleged protection of the aircraft,” said Y.

“It is highly likely that this project was not catered for in the CDIS internal budget, owing to the fact that the protection of the aircraft did not fall within the SSA’s duly authorised mandate.

“The R1.5 million a month in the expenditur­e incurred by the CDIS, was unplanned.

“This meant almost 40% of the CDIS budget was redirected from other operationa­l activities in order to meet the requiremen­ts of the project.

“We have done our own calculatio­ns for one year, which would have been below 40% and above 40% for the next year,” said Y.

K, who served in the chief directorat­e for internal security and its former boss, only identified as “Johan”, said the unit was weakened and the integrity of its vetting processes was eroded.

The directorat­e’s members, who helped in the plunder of state resources, had illegal access to firearms, were involved in the transporta­tion of cash for operations and involved in a parallel vetting structure.

K also confirmed Y’s assertion that the directorat­e’s members were implicated in the robbery of R17 million in cash at the SSA’s headquarte­rs, Musanda complex in Tshwane, in December 2015.

Members involved in the theft – confirmed by a senior official – were currently still in the employ of the SSA.

 ?? Picture: Gallo Image ?? SPY BUSINESS. The safety of former president Jacob Zuma’s presidenti­al aircraft took up 40% of the chief directorat­e for internal security’s budget of
R48 million.
Picture: Gallo Image SPY BUSINESS. The safety of former president Jacob Zuma’s presidenti­al aircraft took up 40% of the chief directorat­e for internal security’s budget of R48 million.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa