The Citizen (Gauteng)

Workers demand jobs

LABOUR COURT: DOZENS DISMISSED BY EKURHULENI IN DEMONSTRAT­ION

- Asanda Matlhare – asandam@citizen.co.za

Matter postponed so judges can have all the necessary documentat­ion.

The dismissed workers of the Ekurhuleni metropolit­an municipali­ty showed up in numbers yesterday to protest outside the Labour Appeal Court where a case against the council was heard.

William Gondwane, one of the workers, said he showed up outside court to support his colleagues and to find out when they would be reinstated.

“Our main issue and question is when will we be reinstated back to work because the Labour Relations Act allows us to be permanent workers at the municipali­ty. We are tired of being unemployed,” said Gondwane.

“The pandemic hasn’t made our situation any easier because we don’t qualify for the R350 government grants as we are still regarded as employees of the municipali­ty.”

Another worker, Lawrence Madonsela, said being dismissed unfairly has had a negative impact on him financiall­y as he had to find other ways to make income.

“I sometimes do my neighbour’s garden because that’s how I can make money at the moment,” Madonsela said.

The workers, represente­d by the Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) were semiskille­d and formed part of the Lungile Mtshali Developmen­t Plan project – a “job-creation programme” which promised them practical and theoretica­l training, as well as the formation of cooperativ­es.

This, they say, never happened. Instead, they worked for Ekurhuleni municipali­ty, fulfilling the municipali­ty’s obligation­s of, among other things, cleaning streets and drains, but without the benefits of full-time employment.

While working for the municipali­ty, the workers wanted to be recognised as permanent employees because the work they did was not temporary in nature and there was no justifiabl­e reason for fixing the term of their contracts.

As a result, they referred their case to the SA Local Government Bargaining Council to be declared permanent employees of the municipali­ty in terms of section 198B of the Labour Relations Act.

Shortly after this, they were dismissed.

Following the applicants’ dismissal, the municipali­ty engaged a company called Hlaniki Investment Holdings to recruit, provide, and manage the employees to do the same work for the municipali­ty that they had done previously.

The Gauteng Enterprise Propeller was also engaged by the municipali­ty to coordinate a “job creation programme”, in which the employees were supposed to be involved.

On 14 December, 2015, the workers signed a further contract with Hlaniki and the Gauteng Enterprise Propeller.

In terms of this contract, they continued performing the same work for the municipali­ty but without the benefits promised in terms of the “job creation programme”.

Jessica Kaye Lawrence, the lawyer representi­ng the workers, said the matter was postponed due to the judges not having enough documentat­ion before them, but a time frame was set for the next appearance and for when the documents were expected.

 ?? Picture: Nigel Sibanda ?? TOO LONG. Lungile Mtshali workers protest outside Labour Court in Johannesbu­rg yesterday, after their case against the City of Ekhuruleni has taken five years to resolve because of corruption in the municipali­ty.
Picture: Nigel Sibanda TOO LONG. Lungile Mtshali workers protest outside Labour Court in Johannesbu­rg yesterday, after their case against the City of Ekhuruleni has taken five years to resolve because of corruption in the municipali­ty.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa