High cost of eviction
DUNKELD WEST: COURT SAYS SQUATTERS CAN RETURN TO PROPERTY
Documents, infrastructure lost, destroyed by Red Ants.
Nhlanhla Gwendoline Sibanda is a sex worker who has been unable to make enough money during the Covid-19 lockdown to pay rent and other expenses.
She moved on to an empty property in the upmarket suburb of Dunkeld West last year and lives with about 50 other people, some of whom claim to have been living there for over two decades.
There is no running water on the property.
“Our industry really suffered last year. I lost my income and had to find another place to stay,” she said.
The occupiers were evicted this month on the basis of an interdict.
But, represented by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (Seri), they successfully challenged the eviction in the High Court in Johannesburg, which ruled on 9 April that the eviction was unlawful.
The occupiers were then allowed to move back.
Seri argued the eviction was illegal because it was done without a court order.
Khuselwa Dyantyi, a candidate attorney at Seri, said Red Ant Security Relocation & Eviction Services (Red Ants) had used an interim interdict granted in February to evict all of the occupiers.
According to Dyantyi, the owners of the property had to have applied for a court order in accordance with the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act.
When GroundUp visited the building last week, residents recalled the moment a tractor loader ploughed through the property, destroying many of their structures.
Piles of rubble were dumped on the property, blocking the pit toilet.
Sipho Ntuli said he had been living on the property since 1994. He said things went downhill for them on 6 April when they were forcefully evicted by the Red Ants.
“Before the eviction … we [had] dug a pit latrine and made arrangements for water. Now we have lost all of that and have no sanitation facilities at all,” he said.
The occupiers moved back on 9 April and had to rebuild their homes with the little left over from the destruction.
Ntuli lost most of his important documents, including his bank card and ID. “I have nothing now,” he said.
Pusetso Nolwane moved to the property in 2013 after coming to South Africa from Lesotho in search of work. Personal belongings lost during the eviction included his passport.
Many of the occupiers are domestic workers and gardeners. Others are unemployed or sort recycle materials.
A number acknowledged their occupations were unlawful. But they wanted the City of Joburg to follow proper procedure and ensure they had alternative accommodation.
Nthatisi Modingoane, deputy director of communications for the City of Joburg, said the social development department had made several attempts to intervene in the matter.
“We offered alternative accommodation at homeless shelters should they wish to evict the occupants. After many attempts, the people living in that property have refused the city’s help. Our social workers are constantly being chased away whenever they try to reach out to these people.”
Concerned that the interim interdict is the start of eviction proceedings, the occupiers will return to court on 3 May to oppose it being made a final order.
“Our clients … had been living on the property before the interim interdict was issued,” said Dyantyi. “We will be arguing that this interdict does not apply to our clients because they are unlawful occupiers and not invaders.” – GroundUp
Now we have no sanitation facilities at all